Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👌 Improve Project API data handling #1257

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 24, 2023

Conversation

s-weigand
Copy link
Member

@s-weigand s-weigand commented Feb 24, 2023

This PR improves the data handling of the Project API in notebook workflows.

Since notebooks are often executed as a whole (Run All) the default of ignore_existing=False in project.import_data leads to using ignore_existing=True each time calling it in an actual case study, which makes the code less readable and adds a lot of redundancy and a default of ignore_existing=True is more sensible (IMHO ignore_existing=False only makes sense in a CLI or GUI context).

Having to import each dataset one by one also clutters the code quite a lot.

project.import_data("measured_data/Npq2_220219_800target3fasea.ascii", dataset_name="TA")
project.import_data(guide_s1, dataset_name="guide_s1")
project.import_data(guide_s2, dataset_name="guide_s2")
project.import_data(guide_s3, dataset_name="guide_s3")
project.import_data(guide_s4, dataset_name="guide_s4")
project.import_data(guide_s5, dataset_name="guide_s5")
project.import_data(guide_s6, dataset_name="guide_s6")
project.import_data(guide_s7, dataset_name="guide_s7")
project.import_data(guide_s8, dataset_name="guide_s8")

This is why it is a lot more convenient to allow the use of a mapping (especially since that mapping could have been defined and used for plotting even before importing glotaran at all)

my_datasets ={
    "TA":"measured_data/Npq2_220219_800target3fasea.ascii"
    "guide_s1":guide_s1,
    "guide_s2":guide_s2,
    "guide_s3":guide_s3,
    "guide_s4":guide_s4,
    "guide_s5":guide_s5,
    "guide_s6":guide_s6,
    "guide_s7":guide_s7,
    "guide_s8":guide_s8,
}
project.import_data(my_datasets)

Lastly, users might want to switch out datasets in the optimization without touching the model definition for example to use an averaged dataset to have a quicker feedback loop or to use some other kind of preprocessing/correcting on the data and compare results with the exact same model.

project.optimize("my_model", "my_parameters", data_lookup_overwrite={"TA": averaged_data})

Change summary

Checklist

  • ✔️ Passing the tests (mandatory for all PR's)
  • 🚧 Added changes to changelog (mandatory for all PR's)
  • 🧪 Adds new tests for the feature (mandatory for ✨ feature and 🩹 bug fix PR's)

@s-weigand s-weigand added this to the v0.7.0 milestone Feb 24, 2023
@s-weigand s-weigand requested a review from jsnel as a code owner February 24, 2023 14:02
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 24, 2023

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 0.04%.

Quality metrics Before After Change
Complexity 1.01 ⭐ 1.01 ⭐ 0.00
Method Length 72.29 🙂 74.77 🙂 2.48 👎
Working memory 6.41 🙂 6.44 🙂 0.03 👎
Quality 75.28% 75.24% -0.04% 👎
Other metrics Before After Change
Lines 1510 1597 87
Changed files Quality Before Quality After Quality Change
glotaran/project/project.py 81.67% ⭐ 80.48% ⭐ -1.19% 👎
glotaran/project/project_data_registry.py 61.94% 🙂 61.62% 🙂 -0.32% 👎
glotaran/project/test/test_project.py 73.86% 🙂 74.18% 🙂 0.32% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File Function Complexity Length Working Memory Quality Recommendation
glotaran/project/test/test_project.py test_missing_file_errors 0 ⭐ 377 ⛔ 8 🙂 55.66% 🙂 Try splitting into smaller methods
glotaran/project/project_data_registry.py ProjectDataRegistry.import_data 9 🙂 126 😞 10 😞 56.86% 🙂 Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
glotaran/project/test/test_project.py test_generate_parameters 3 ⭐ 226 ⛔ 8 🙂 57.90% 🙂 Try splitting into smaller methods
glotaran/project/test/test_project.py test_generators_allow_overwrite 0 ⭐ 154 😞 9 🙂 64.56% 🙂 Try splitting into smaller methods
glotaran/project/project.py Project.markdown 0 ⭐ 74 🙂 14 😞 66.14% 🙂 Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

  • ⭐ excellent
  • 🙂 good
  • 😞 poor
  • ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.


Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on branch s-weigand/pyglotaran/improve-project-data-handeling

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 24, 2023

Benchmark is done. Checkout the benchmark result page.
Benchmark differences below 5% might be due to CI noise.

Benchmark diff v0.6.0 vs. main

Parametrized benchmark signatures:

BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(index_dependent, grouped, weight)

All benchmarks:

       before           after         ratio
     [6c3c390e]       [44e9e2ac]
     <v0.6.0>                   
!      41.9±0.1ms           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, False, False)
!      45.0±0.2ms           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, False, True)
!      42.1±0.1ms           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, True, False)
!      45.0±0.3ms           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, True, True)
!      52.1±0.3ms           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, False, False)
!       78.0±30ms           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, False, True)
!        52.8±2ms           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, True, False)
!       61.0±20ms           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, True, True)
             203M             205M     1.01  IntegrationTwoDatasets.peakmem_optimize
-      1.92±0.05s       1.00±0.02s     0.52  IntegrationTwoDatasets.time_optimize

Benchmark diff main vs. PR

Parametrized benchmark signatures:

BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(index_dependent, grouped, weight)

All benchmarks:

       before           after         ratio
     [44e9e2ac]       [0aaac2ed]
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, False, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, False, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, True, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(False, True, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, False, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, False, True)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, True, False)
           failed           failed      n/a  BenchmarkOptimize.time_optimize(True, True, True)
             205M             206M     1.00  IntegrationTwoDatasets.peakmem_optimize
       1.00±0.02s         987±30ms     0.99  IntegrationTwoDatasets.time_optimize

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 88.3% // Head: 88.3% // Increases project coverage by +0.0% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (0aaac2e) compared to base (44e9e2a).
Patch coverage: 100.0% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1257   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   88.3%   88.3%           
=====================================
  Files        104     104           
  Lines       5094    5100    +6     
  Branches     848     852    +4     
=====================================
+ Hits        4499    4505    +6     
  Misses       478     478           
  Partials     117     117           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
glotaran/project/project.py 98.7% <100.0%> (+<0.1%) ⬆️
glotaran/project/project_data_registry.py 100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@s-weigand s-weigand marked this pull request as draft February 24, 2023 19:21
@s-weigand s-weigand marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2023 20:28
Copy link
Member

@jsnel jsnel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some suggestions for variable name improvements and improved help string.

glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/test/test_project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/test/test_project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/project.py Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jsnel jsnel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found some missing verbs

glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
glotaran/project/project.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Joris Snellenburg <jsnel@users.noreply.github.com>
@s-weigand s-weigand force-pushed the improve-project-data-handeling branch from 3e2b870 to 0aaac2e Compare February 24, 2023 21:59
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Member

@jsnel jsnel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM now!

@s-weigand s-weigand merged commit ad8f53e into glotaran:main Feb 24, 2023
@s-weigand s-weigand deleted the improve-project-data-handeling branch February 24, 2023 23:00
jsnel pushed a commit to glotaran/pyglotaran-release-paper-supplementary-information that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
This change refactors the case studies to use the project API and did lead to some[ improvements in the project API
itself](glotaran/pyglotaran#1257).

In addition, it cleans up the model and parameter files as well as notebooks.
Further improvements like using glotaran generated clp guides and explaining the smoothing due `clp_relations` will follow in a different PR.

### Change summary

- [🧹 Add project anchor files to git
ignore](75fd1ce)
- [♻️ Moved original data files from data subfolder to
measured_data](2ec5a1c)
- [🧹 Added data folder to gitignore since it gets populated by
import_data](467fd91)
- [♻️ Converted target_rc to project
API](0701661)
- [♻️ Converted target_rcg_compare to project
API](01ba768)
- [♻️ Converted target_rcg_gcrcg_rcgcr_refine to project
API](49b92c9)
- [♻️ Moved original data 4TT files from data subfolder to
measured_data](bd06310)
- [👌 Added clp_relations for smoothong of generated guidance
spectra](cc60ac0)
- [🧹 Cleaned rcg_refine models and parameters from unused
code](524af94)
- [🧹 Removed dead code comments in target_rc
model](a88cd8c)
- [👌 Use result create_clp_guide_dataset method instead of
function](84fa1ed)
- [👌 Show cleaned up model and parameter
definition](7bdda07)
- [♻️ Converted 4TT to project
API](89ac3a0)
- [♻️ Moved original data dPSI files from data subfolder to
measured_data](85ce095)
- [🧹 Ignore data folders in general since they get populated by
import_data](953dfa5)
- [♻️ Converted dPSI to project
API](73816e0)
- [🧹 Make use of improved project
API](b434331)
- [🧹 Cleaned up rc model and
parameters](079057b)
- [🧹 Cleaned up target_rcg_gcrcg_rcgcr_refine model and
parameters](621113c)
- [🧹 Cleaned up 4TT models and
parameters](f93712f)
- [🧹 Cleaned up dPSI
model](f0deea3)
- [🧹 Cleaned up rc
notebook](3ad4b6c)
- [🔧 Ignore pdfs folder when running
pytest](2a08eee)

---------

Co-authored-by: Ivo van Stokkum <i.h.m.van.stokkum@vu.nl>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants