Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ado2gh lock-repo documentation to clarify required scopes fo… #1207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2024

Conversation

timrogers
Copy link
Contributor

@timrogers timrogers commented Jan 12, 2024

This updates the documentation for the ado2gh lock-repo command to document which scopes you need on your personal access token.

Props to @antgrutta for flagging this gap and figuring out the right scopes 🙌🏻

  • Did you write/update appropriate tests
  • Release notes updated (if appropriate)
  • Appropriate logging output
  • Issue linked
  • Docs updated (or issue created)
  • New package licenses are added to ThirdPartyNotices.txt (if applicable)

@timrogers timrogers self-assigned this Jan 12, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Unit Test Results

795 tests   795 ✅  21s ⏱️
  1 suites    0 💤
  1 files      0 ❌

Results for commit 7dd8a72.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@jeviet jeviet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

Copy link

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Complexity Health
ado2gh 84% 79% 614
gei 78% 70% 511
Octoshift 86% 75% 1246
bbs2gh 78% 73% 645
Summary 83% (6672 / 8075) 74% (1498 / 2014) 3016

@timrogers timrogers merged commit 6025a95 into main Jan 12, 2024
30 checks passed
@timrogers timrogers deleted the timrogers/ado2gh-lock-repo-scopes branch January 12, 2024 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants