V9.0.0/task based sceanario relocation #95
Conversation
…onverting Failure to JSON
…en by IDecorator, incl. consequence changes
…(reduce footprint of core)
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to various classes and methods within the Cuemon framework, focusing on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
src/Cuemon.Core/Infrastructure.cs (1)
1-12: Consider adding XML documentation.To improve code maintainability and clarity, consider adding XML documentation for the
Infrastructureclass and theDefaultPropertyValueResolvermethod. This would help other developers understand the purpose and usage of this utility class and method.Here's a suggested documentation structure:
/// <summary> /// Provides internal infrastructure utilities for the Cuemon framework. /// </summary> internal static class Infrastructure { /// <summary> /// Resolves the value of a property for a given object. /// </summary> /// <param name="source">The source object containing the property.</param> /// <param name="pi">The PropertyInfo of the property to resolve.</param> /// <returns>The value of the property, or null if the source is null.</returns> internal static object DefaultPropertyValueResolver(object source, PropertyInfo pi) { // Existing implementation } }src/Cuemon.Core/Decorator.cs (1)
32-42: Approved: NewRawEnclose<T>method provides flexibility, but consider enhancing documentation.The addition of the
RawEnclose<T>method is a good enhancement, providing flexibility for scenarios where null checking is not desired. The implementation correctly reuses the existingEnclosemethod, promoting code reuse.Consider enhancing the XML documentation to explicitly warn about the potential for null reference exceptions. For example:
/// <remarks> /// Unlike <see cref="Enclose{T}"/>, this method does not perform a null-check when wrapping the value. /// Caution: This method may lead to null reference exceptions if the inner object is null. Use with care. /// </remarks>This addition would help developers understand the risks associated with using this method.
test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/StreamExtensionsTest.cs (1)
412-439: Improved test coverage with new ToStreamAsync testsThe addition of
ToStreamAsync_ShouldConvertStringToStreamandToStreamAsync_ShouldConvertByteArrayToStreammethods significantly enhances the test coverage for theToStreamAsyncfunctionality. These tests effectively verify the conversion of both string and byte array inputs to streams, checking both the length and content of the resulting streams.The use of
Generate.RandomStringandGenerate.FixedStringprovides good variety in test data. However, consider adding a test case with a small, predefined string to ensure correct handling of known input and output, which could aid in debugging if these tests ever fail.Consider adding a test case with a small, predefined string, for example:
[Fact] public async Task ToStreamAsync_ShouldConvertPredefinedStringToStream() { var predefinedString = "Hello, World!"; var s = await predefinedString.ToStreamAsync(); using (var sr = new StreamReader(s)) { var result = await sr.ReadToEndAsync(); Assert.Equal(predefinedString.Length, s.Length); Assert.Equal(predefinedString, result); } }This additional test case would provide a quick, easily verifiable check alongside the existing thorough tests with generated data.
src/Cuemon.Resilience/TransientOperation.Async.cs (1)
Line range hint
332-359: LGTM: NewWithActionAsyncmethod added with 5 parameters.The new method extends the functionality of the
TransientOperationclass to support operations with 5 parameters. The implementation is consistent with existing methods, maintaining code coherence and following established patterns.Consider adding a brief example in the XML documentation to illustrate the usage of this method with 5 parameters. This would enhance the documentation and make it easier for developers to understand how to use this new overload.
src/Cuemon.Threading/GlobalSuppressions.cs (1)
112-160: Consider the impact of numerous suppressions on code maintainabilityThe addition of multiple suppressions for methods with many generic parameters or method parameters is noted. While this approach allows for flexible API design, it's important to consider the long-term maintainability and readability of the code.
These suppressions are justified with comments like "By design; allow up till 5 generic arguments" or "By design; think about it as a Tuple/Variadic - but for Task based Func delegates." This indicates a deliberate design decision. However, consider the following suggestions for future improvements:
Evaluate if some of these methods could be refactored to use a more concise approach, such as using a single parameter object that encapsulates multiple parameters.
Consider using the
System.ValueTupletype for methods with many parameters, which could potentially reduce the need for custom generic types with many type parameters.For methods with many generic type parameters, consider if some of these could be grouped into a higher-level abstraction or if a different design pattern could be applied to reduce complexity.
Document the rationale behind these design decisions in the project's architecture documentation to help future maintainers understand the reasons for these suppressions.
While these suppressions are approved as they align with the current design decisions, it would be beneficial to periodically review and assess if this approach continues to serve the project's needs as it evolves.
src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/TaskActionFactory.cs (1)
51-56: Consider Awaiting the Task for Exception HandlingIn the
ExecuteMethodAsyncmethod, you return the invoked task without awaiting it:return Method.Invoke(GenericArguments, ct);While returning the task is acceptable, awaiting it within the method can provide better exception handling and clearer stack traces.
Consider modifying the method to:
public async Task ExecuteMethodAsync(CancellationToken ct) { ThrowIfNoValidDelegate(Condition.IsNull(Method)); ct.ThrowIfCancellationRequested(); await Method.Invoke(GenericArguments, ct).ConfigureAwait(false); }This ensures that any exceptions thrown during execution are caught within this method context.
src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncPatterns.cs (3)
21-22: Correct grammatical errors in documentation comments.The phrase "abide the rule description" should be "abide by the rule description" for grammatical accuracy.
Apply this diff to correct the summary:
-/// Provides a generic way to abide the rule description of CA2000 (Dispose objects before losing scope). +/// Provides a generic way to abide by the rule description of CA2000 (Dispose objects before losing scope).
25-26: Improve parameter descriptions for clarity and grammar.In the parameter descriptions, "abides CA2000" should be "abide by CA2000" to maintain consistency and proper grammar.
Apply this diff to update the parameter description:
-/// <param name="tester">The function delegate that is used to ensure that operations performed on <typeparamref name="TResult"/> abides CA2000.</param> +/// <param name="tester">The function delegate that is used to ensure that operations performed on <typeparamref name="TResult"/> abide by CA2000.</param>Repeat this correction for all occurrences in the overloads.
1-190: Add unit tests forAsyncPatternsmethods.To ensure the reliability and correctness of these utility methods, it's important to have comprehensive unit tests covering various scenarios, including normal execution, exception handling, and resource disposal.
Would you like assistance in generating unit tests for the
AsyncPatternsclass?src/Cuemon.IO/Extensions/StreamDecoratorExtensions.cs (1)
Line range hint
498-514: Inconsistent spacing in cancellation token parameterAt line 514, there is no space after the colon in
ct:options.CancellationToken. For consistency and readability, please add a space after the colon.Apply this diff to correct the spacing:
- }, ct:options.CancellationToken); + }, ct: options.CancellationToken);src/Cuemon.Threading/TaskActionFactory.cs (6)
Line range hint
10-12: Update method XML documentation to remove references toTaskActionFactory<TTuple>.The method summary mentions
TaskActionFactory<TTuple>, which no longer exists. Update the documentation to reflect the correct return type.Apply this diff to fix the documentation:
- /// Creates a new <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/>. + /// Creates a new task action factory instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/>.
Line range hint
20-24: Update XML documentation for theCreatemethod with one generic argument.The documentation still refers to
TaskActionFactory{TTuple}. Please update it to match the current codebase.Apply this diff:
- /// Creates a new <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and one generic argument. + /// Creates a new task action factory instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and one generic argument.
Line range hint
30-36: Update XML documentation for theCreatemethod with two generic arguments.Ensure that the documentation does not reference the removed
TaskActionFactory<TTuple>class.Apply this diff:
- /// Creates a new <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and two generic arguments. + /// Creates a new task action factory instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and two generic arguments.
Line range hint
44-50: Update XML documentation for theCreatemethod with three generic arguments.Again, remove references to
TaskActionFactory<TTuple>in the documentation.Apply this diff:
- /// Creates a new <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and three generic arguments. + /// Creates a new task action factory instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and three generic arguments.
Line range hint
58-64: Consistently update documentation across allCreatemethods.The issue with outdated references to
TaskActionFactory<TTuple>appears in the documentation of all overloadedCreatemethods. Please ensure all summaries are updated accordingly.Example diff for one of the methods:
- /// Creates a new <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and four generic arguments. + /// Creates a new task action factory instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and four generic arguments.Please apply similar updates to the documentation of methods handling up to fifteen generic arguments.
Line range hint
5-412: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication inCreatemethods.The
TaskActionFactoryclass contains multiple overloadedCreatemethods with similar logic, differing only in the number of generic arguments. This leads to substantial code duplication and can increase maintenance overhead.Consider using params arrays, tuple types, or leveraging expression trees to handle a variable number of arguments more elegantly. This could simplify the code and make it more maintainable.
src/Cuemon.Diagnostics/TimeMeasure.Async.cs (4)
Line range hint
14-230: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication in overloads.The numerous
WithActionAsyncandWithFuncAsyncmethod overloads with varying type parameters (from 0 to 10) introduce significant code duplication. To enhance maintainability and adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider utilizing code generation techniques like T4 templates or source generators. Alternatively, explore using parameter arrays or tuples to handle multiple arguments, though this may require changes to the method signatures.
Line range hint
213-220: Add missing<exception>documentation forArgumentNullException.The method
WithFuncAsync<TResult>is missing the<exception>documentation tag forArgumentNullException, which is thrown when thefunctionparameter is null. Adding this information enhances the code documentation's completeness and consistency.Apply this diff to include the missing exception documentation:
public static Task<TimeMeasureProfiler<TResult>> WithFuncAsync<TResult>(Func<CancellationToken, Task<TResult>> function, Action<AsyncTimeMeasureOptions> setup = null) { + /// <exception cref="ArgumentNullException"> + /// <paramref name="function"/> cannot be null. + /// </exception> Validator.ThrowIfNull(function); var factory = TaskFuncFactory.Create(function); return WithFunctionAsyncCore(factory, setup); }
Line range hint
150-150: Correct typographical error in parameter documentation forarg9.In the
<param>documentation forarg9, there is an unnecessary space before the period. Removing it improves readability and maintains consistency across the documentation.Apply this diff to correct the typo:
/// <param name="arg9">The ninth parameter of the <paramref name="action" /> delegate .</param> +/// <param name="arg9">The ninth parameter of the <paramref name="action" /> delegate.</param>
Line range hint
380-385: Preserve stack trace when rethrowing exceptions.Rethrowing
ex.InnerExceptionusingthrow ex.InnerExceptioncan lead to loss of the original stack trace, making debugging more difficult. To preserve the stack trace, useExceptionDispatchInfo.Capturewhen rethrowing the exception.Apply this diff to modify the exception handling:
catch (TargetInvocationException ex) { - throw ex.InnerException ?? ex; // don't confuse the end-user with reflection related details; return the originating exception + if (ex.InnerException != null) + { + System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Capture(ex.InnerException).Throw(); + } + else + { + throw; + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (37)
- src/Cuemon.Core/ActionFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Decorator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/ByteArrayDecoratorExtensions.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/DelegateDecoratorExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/StringDecoratorExtensions.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/FuncFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/GlobalSuppressions.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Infrastructure.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Patterns.cs (6 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/TesterFuncFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/TaskActionFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/TaskFuncFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Diagnostics/Cuemon.Diagnostics.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Diagnostics/TimeMeasure.Async.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.IO/ByteArrayExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.IO/StringExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/FailureConverter.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/GlobalSuppressions.cs (0 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.IO/Extensions/StreamDecoratorExtensions.cs (5 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Resilience/Cuemon.Resilience.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Resilience/TransientOperation.Async.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncPatterns.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/GlobalSuppressions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/TaskActionFactory.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/TaskFuncFactory.cs (3 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Diagnostics/ApplicationBuilderExtensionsTest.cs (3 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs (3 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/ByteArrayDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/DisposableTest.cs (4 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Reflection/AssemblyDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/StringDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/StreamExtensionsTest.cs (3 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.IO.Tests/Cuemon.IO.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Cuemon.IO.Tests/StreamDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (8 hunks)
- tooling/gse/gse.csproj (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/ByteArrayDecoratorExtensions.cs
- src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/StringDecoratorExtensions.cs
- src/Cuemon.Core/GlobalSuppressions.cs
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/FailureConverter.cs
- src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/GlobalSuppressions.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (60)
src/Cuemon.Core/Infrastructure.cs (1)
8-11: LGTM:DefaultPropertyValueResolverimplementation is correct.The
DefaultPropertyValueResolvermethod is implemented correctly. It safely handles null sources and uses reflection to get the property value. This implementation aligns with best practices for property value resolution.test/Cuemon.IO.Tests/Cuemon.IO.Tests.csproj (1)
8-9: New project reference added correctly.The new project reference to
Cuemon.Extensions.IOhas been added correctly. This addition aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing code quality and maintainability by potentially providing additional IO-related extensions for testing.However, consider the following:
- Ensure that this new reference doesn't introduce any circular dependencies.
- Verify if any existing tests need to be updated to use the new extensions.
- Consider adding new tests to cover the functionality provided by
Cuemon.Extensions.IO.To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
src/Cuemon.Resilience/Cuemon.Resilience.csproj (1)
14-14: LGTM! Verify impact on Cuemon.Resilience.The addition of the Cuemon.Threading project reference aligns with the PR objectives, specifically the relocation of ActionFactory and FuncFactory to a specialized assembly. This change is consistent with the project structure and naming conventions.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected dependencies or break existing functionality, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any immediate impacts of the new reference on the Cuemon.Resilience project.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/ByteArrayDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-30: Consider the impact of removing the asynchronous test method.The asynchronous test method
ToStreamAsync_ShouldConvertByteArrayToStreamhas been removed, which aligns with the PR objective of removingToStreamAsyncmethods. However, this removal might impact the test coverage for asynchronous operations.To ensure that there are no remaining usages of the removed
ToStreamAsyncmethod and to verify if alternative tests have been added, please run the following script:If the verification reveals that there are no alternative tests for the asynchronous functionality, would you like assistance in creating a new test method to maintain adequate test coverage?
src/Cuemon.Diagnostics/Cuemon.Diagnostics.csproj (1)
14-14: LGTM! Verify build process after adding new reference.The addition of the Cuemon.Threading project reference aligns with the PR objectives, particularly the relocation of
ActionFactoryandFuncFactoryclasses. This change appears necessary and correct.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please verify:
- The project builds successfully with this new reference.
- There are no circular dependencies introduced.
- The relative path is correct in your project structure.
You can use the following command to check for successful build:
tooling/gse/gse.csproj (1)
22-22: LGTM! Consider thorough testing with the updated package.The update of
Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNetfrom version 9.0.0-preview.3 to 9.0.0-preview.5 aligns with the PR objectives of code cleanup and refactoring. This minor version update likely includes bug fixes or small improvements.However, as this is still a preview version, please ensure thorough testing to catch any potential breaking changes or instabilities. Consider running the following commands to verify the impact:
src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/DelegateDecoratorExtensions.cs (3)
1-5: LGTM: Appropriate namespace and using directives.The namespace and using directives are correctly implemented and align with the functionality provided in this file.
6-12: LGTM: Well-documented static class for extension methods.The class declaration and XML documentation are well-implemented. The static class is appropriate for extension methods, and the documentation provides clear information about the class's purpose and related types.
13-18: LGTM: Well-documented method signature.The method signature and XML documentation are well-implemented. The purpose of the method and its parameters are clearly described, which enhances code readability and maintainability.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/StringDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (2)
Line range hint
1-72: LGTM: Existing tests are well-structuredThe remaining test methods in this file are well-structured and cover important functionality of the
StringDecoratorExtensionsclass. The tests for encoding and stream conversion are comprehensive and follow good testing practices.
Line range hint
1-72: Verify the removal of asynchronous functionalityThe
ToStreamAsync_ShouldConvertStringToStreamtest method has been removed, which aligns with the PR objectives of removingToStreamAsyncmethods. However, this change might impact the test coverage for asynchronous operations in theStringDecoratorExtensionsclass.To ensure we're not missing any important test coverage, let's verify if there are any remaining asynchronous methods in the
StringDecoratorExtensionsclass:If these searches return results, consider adding corresponding test methods to maintain adequate test coverage.
test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/Reflection/AssemblyDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (1)
44-44: Verify the updated type count rangeThe assertion for the number of types in the Cuemon.Core assembly has been adjusted from the range 475-575 to 425-525. This change narrows and shifts the expected range downwards, which could indicate:
- A significant refactoring or cleanup in the Cuemon.Core assembly, resulting in fewer types.
- An adjustment based on more accurate observations of the actual type count.
While the comment explains the wide range due to CI tooling and refactoring, it's important to ensure this change aligns with recent modifications to the Cuemon.Core assembly.
To confirm this change is appropriate, please run the following script:
This script will help verify if the new range is appropriate for the current state of the Cuemon.Core assembly.
src/Cuemon.Core/Decorator.cs (1)
32-42: LGTM: Excellent integration with existing code.The
RawEnclose<T>method is well-integrated into the existingDecoratorclass. It complements theEnclosemethod, providing a clear alternative for cases where null-checking is not desired. The method naming and structure are consistent with the rest of the class, maintaining good code organization.test/Cuemon.IO.Tests/StreamDecoratorExtensionsTest.cs (8)
51-51: Simplified stream creationThe change from
Decorator.Enclose(fs).ToStreamAsync()tofs.ToStreamAsync()simplifies the code while maintaining functionality. This aligns well with the PR's objective of code cleanup and refactoring.
76-76: Consistent simplificationThis change is consistent with the simplification in the
CompressBrotliAsync_ShouldCompressAndDecompressmethod. It maintains a uniform approach to stream creation across the test class.
115-115: Consistent simplification across compression methodsThe change to
fs.ToStreamAsync()maintains a consistent approach to stream creation across different compression methods. This uniformity enhances code readability and maintainability.
140-140: Consistent simplification in exception testingThe change to
fs.ToStreamAsync()maintains consistency even in exception testing scenarios. This uniform approach across different test cases enhances the overall coherence of the test suite.
177-177: Uniform simplification across all compression methodsThe change to
fs.ToStreamAsync()maintains a consistent approach to stream creation across all compression methods (Brotli, GZip, and Deflate). This uniformity significantly enhances the overall consistency and readability of the test suite.
202-202: Consistent simplification across all test scenariosThe change to
fs.ToStreamAsync()maintains a uniform approach to stream creation across all test scenarios, including compression methods and exception testing. This consistency significantly improves the maintainability and readability of the entire test class.
281-283: Consistent simplification adapted for byte arraysThe changes to
fsBytesUnicode.ToStreamAsync()andfsBytesIso88591.ToStreamAsync()maintain the consistent simplification approach while adapting it for byte arrays. This demonstrates the flexibility of the newToStreamAsync()method and further unifies the stream creation process across different data types.
Line range hint
1-307: Overall improvement in code clarity and consistencyThe changes in this file consistently simplify stream creation across all test methods, replacing
Decorator.Enclose(fs).ToStreamAsync()withfs.ToStreamAsync()or its byte array equivalent. This refactoring aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of code cleanup and improved maintainability. The uniform approach enhances readability and reduces complexity without altering the functionality of the tests. These changes demonstrate a well-executed refactoring that will likely make the codebase easier to maintain and understand in the future.test/Cuemon.Extensions.IO.Tests/StreamExtensionsTest.cs (3)
278-278: Simplified stream conversionThe change from
Decorator.Enclose(sut2).ToStreamAsync()tosut2.ToStreamAsync()simplifies the code while maintaining the same functionality. This aligns well with the PR's objective of code cleanup and refactoring.
342-342: Consistent simplification across methodsThe change from
Decorator.Enclose(sut2).ToStreamAsync()tosut2.ToStreamAsync()is consistent with the similar change in the CompressBrotliAsync_ShouldThrowTaskCanceledException method. This ensures uniformity in the codebase and aligns with the refactoring objectives.
404-404: Consistent simplification across all compression methodsThe change from
Decorator.Enclose(sut2).ToStreamAsync()tosut2.ToStreamAsync()is now consistently applied across all compression test methods (Brotli, GZip, and Deflate). This uniformity improves code readability and maintainability.src/Cuemon.Resilience/TransientOperation.Async.cs (1)
4-4: LGTM: New using directive added.The addition of
using Cuemon.Threading;aligns with the PR objectives of relocating classes to a specialized assembly. This change enhances code organization and modularity.src/Cuemon.Threading/TaskFuncFactory.cs (3)
5-5: Namespace declaration looks good.The
Cuemon.Threadingnamespace is appropriate for this class, as it deals with task-related functionality.
20-20: Consistent improvement in lambda expressions across allCreatemethods.The change from
tupleto_as the parameter name in lambda expressions is a good practice. It clearly indicates that the parameter is intentionally unused in the lambda body. This change improves code readability and adheres to C# conventions for unused parameters.Also applies to: 34-34, 48-48, 63-63, 79-79, 96-96, 114-114, 133-133, 153-153, 174-174, 196-196, 219-219, 243-243, 268-268, 294-294
Line range hint
1-428: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.While the current implementation is functional, there's significant repetition across the 15
Createmethod overloads. Consider the following suggestions to improve maintainability and reduce duplication:
- Implement a generic method using
paramsto handle variable number of arguments.- Utilize C# 9.0+ features like function pointers or expression trees to create a more flexible and concise implementation.
- If .NET 6+ is available, consider using the
ArgumentList<T1, ..., T16>struct to handle up to 16 arguments in a type-safe manner.These approaches could potentially reduce the number of overloads needed and make the code more maintainable.
Additionally, verify if all 15 overloads are necessary for your use cases. If some are rarely or never used, consider removing them to simplify the API.
To verify the usage of these overloads, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify which
Createmethod overloads are actually being used in your codebase, allowing you to make an informed decision about potentially removing unused overloads.src/Cuemon.Core/ActionFactory.cs (1)
489-489: Verify the impact of the delegate info resolution change.The modification in how
DelegateInfois assigned looks reasonable, but it's important to verify its impact on theActionFactory<TTuple>behavior.
- Please confirm that the
Decorator.RawEnclosemethod is properly implemented and tested.- Verify that this change doesn't alter the behavior of
ActionFactory<TTuple>in any unexpected ways.- Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for this change, as it's not immediately clear why the
RawEnclosemethod is now necessary.To help verify the change, you can run the following script to check for any related test updates or new tests:
This script will help identify any related test updates and usages of the new
Decorator.RawEnclosemethod.src/Cuemon.Core/FuncFactory.cs (1)
509-509: Approved with a request for clarificationThe change looks good and likely enhances the delegate information processing. However, I have a few points for consideration:
Could you please clarify the purpose of
Decorator.RawEnclose()? Understanding its functionality would help in assessing the full impact of this change.Consider updating the method or class documentation to reflect this change, explaining why
Decorator.RawEnclose()is now being used.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, could you run the following verification script?
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization/Cuemon.Extensions.Globalization.csproj (1)
1203-1203: Approved: Package reference updated, but caution advised.The update of the Codebelt.Extensions.YamlDotNet package from version 9.0.0-preview.3 to 9.0.0-preview.5 is a good practice to stay current with the latest features and bug fixes. However, it's important to note that this is still a preview version, which may introduce breaking changes or new bugs.
Please ensure thorough testing of the application, particularly any functionality that relies on YamlDotNet, to verify compatibility with this new preview version. Consider running the following commands to check for any breaking changes or issues:
src/Cuemon.Core/TesterFuncFactory.cs (1)
530-530: LGTM! Verify the impact of the delegate resolution change.The change from
Infrastructure.ResolveDelegateInfo(method, originalDelegate)toDecorator.RawEnclose(method).ResolveDelegateInfo(originalDelegate)looks good. This modification enhances the delegate resolution process by wrapping themethodwithDecorator.RawEnclose().To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, please run the following verification:
This script will help identify any potential areas that might be affected by this change, allowing you to ensure that the modification is consistent across the codebase and properly tested.
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.Mvc.FunctionalTests/Filters/Diagnostics/FaultDescriptorFilterTest.cs (4)
96-96: Approved: Key change in exception details JSONThe modification from
"key": "serverError"to"app": "serverError"in the exception details JSON is consistent with the PR objectives for code cleanup and refactoring. This change improves the clarity of the error data structure.
173-173: Approved: Consistent key change across test casesThe change from
"key": "serverError"to"app": "serverError"is consistently applied here as well. This demonstrates a thorough approach to the refactoring process, ensuring that all relevant test cases are updated to reflect the new error data structure.
199-199: Approved: Consistent key change in XML outputThe modification from
<key>serverError</key>to<app>serverError</app>in the XML output mirrors the changes made in the JSON format. This demonstrates a comprehensive update to the error data structure across different output formats, ensuring consistency in error reporting.
Line range hint
1-1180: Summary: Comprehensive update to error data structureThe changes in this file demonstrate a thorough and consistent update to the error data structure across various test cases and output formats (JSON and XML). The modification from using "key" to "app" for the server error identifier improves clarity and aligns with the PR's objectives of code cleanup and refactoring.
These changes contribute positively to the overall code quality and maintainability of the error handling system. The consistency of the updates across different scenarios indicates a meticulous approach to the refactoring process.
src/Cuemon.Extensions.IO/ByteArrayExtensions.cs (3)
3-5: Appropriate addition of necessary namespacesThe inclusion of
System.ThreadingandCuemon.Threadingnamespaces is appropriate for supporting asynchronous execution and cancellation tokens in the newToStreamAsyncmethod.
29-32: XML documentation accurately reflects the method updatesThe updated XML comments correctly include the new
cancellationTokenparameter and provide clear information about its purpose and default value. This ensures that the method is well-documented for users.
37-49: Correct implementation of asynchronous byte array to stream conversionThe
ToStreamAsyncmethod is properly implemented to convert a byte array to a stream asynchronously with cancellation support. The use ofAsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsynceffectively manages the asynchronous operation and ensures compatibility across different target frameworks with the conditional compilation directives.src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/TaskActionFactory.cs (1)
18-20: Clarify the Use of 'originalDelegate' ParameterIn the constructor, you pass
methodas both the delegate to invoke and theoriginalDelegate:public TaskActionFactory(Func<TTuple, CancellationToken, Task> method, TTuple tuple) : this(method, tuple, method)This might be confusing if
originalDelegateis meant to represent a different delegate. Ensure that this approach is intentional and thatoriginalDelegateaccurately represents the original delegate wrapped bymethod.Run the following script to confirm the usage and intent of
originalDelegate:✅ Verification successful
Clarify the Use of 'originalDelegate' Parameter
After verifying the usage of
originalDelegate, it is confirmed that passingmethodas both the delegate to invoke and theoriginalDelegateis intentional and consistently implemented across the codebase. TheResolveDelegateInfomethod effectively handles this pattern to accurately represent the original delegate.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify how 'originalDelegate' is utilized in the base class and related methods. # Search for the 'originalDelegate' parameter usage in base classes. rg --type cs 'originalDelegate' -A 5Length of output: 4486
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect base class constructors that accept 'originalDelegate' and examine the ResolveDelegateInfo method. # Find base classes that have constructors with 'originalDelegate' rg --type cs 'base\(' -A 10 | grep 'originalDelegate' -B 5 # Locate the implementation of ResolveDelegateInfo method rg --type cs 'ResolveDelegateInfo' -A 10Length of output: 8819
src/Cuemon.Extensions.IO/StringExtensions.cs (2)
6-6: Approved: Added necessary using directiveThe inclusion of
using Cuemon.Threading;is appropriate as it is required for theAsyncPatternsutilized in theToStreamAsyncmethod.
51-51: Verify the conversion of encoding optionsIn line 51,
Patterns.ConfigureExchange<AsyncEncodingOptions, EncodingOptions>(setup)is used to convert asynchronous encoding options to synchronous ones. Ensure that any asynchronous-specific configurations are correctly mapped and that no important options are lost during this conversion.Consider reviewing the
Patterns.ConfigureExchangemethod to confirm that all relevant properties fromAsyncEncodingOptionsare appropriately transferred toEncodingOptions.src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/TaskFuncFactory.cs (2)
19-19: Verify the usage ofmethodasoriginalDelegatein the constructorIn the constructor,
methodis passed as both themethodparameter and theoriginalDelegate. Please confirm if this is intentional. If the original delegate is different from the method being invoked, consider passing the appropriate delegate to ensure accurate delegate information resolution.
65-67: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnsure
Clonemethod creates a complete copyIn the
Clonemethod,GenericArguments.Clone()is cast toTTuple. Verify that theClonemethod ofGenericArgumentsreturns an object compatible withTTupleto avoid casting issues.Additionally, consider cloning the
Methoddelegate if necessary to ensure that all mutable objects are properly duplicated.test/Cuemon.Core.Tests/DisposableTest.cs (6)
9-9: Approved: Added necessary using directiveThe addition of
using Cuemon.Threading;is appropriate to support the use ofAsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsync.
Line range hint
72-79: Approved: Updated to use AsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsync with cancellation tokenThe update to use
AsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsyncand include the cancellation tokenctin the lambda expression is correct. The cancellation token is appropriately passed toms.WriteAllAsync, ensuring proper cancellation handling.
85-95: Approved: Updated exception handling to include cancellation tokenIncluding the cancellation token
ctin the lambda expressions aligns with the new method signature ofAsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsync. Exception handling remains correct and ensures proper resource management.
105-118: Approved: Updated async test to handle cancellation correctlyThe test correctly uses
AsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsyncwith a cancellation token that triggers cancellation as expected. The handling ofTaskCanceledExceptionverifies that cancellation tokens are managed appropriately.
Line range hint
124-131: Approved: Included cancellation token in parameters and usageUpdating the lambda to accept the cancellation token
ctand passing it toms.WriteAllAsyncensures that the operation can be canceled if necessary. This change promotes responsiveness and adheres to best practices for asynchronous programming.
Line range hint
72-131: Verify all usages of Patterns.SafeInvokeAsync are updatedTo ensure consistency and prevent potential issues, verify that all instances of
Patterns.SafeInvokeAsynchave been replaced withAsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsyncthroughout the codebase.Run the following script to find any remaining usages:
✅ Verification successful
All usages of
Patterns.SafeInvokeAsynchave been successfully updated toAsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsyncthroughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any usages of Patterns.SafeInvokeAsync in .cs files # Test: Expect no matches for Patterns.SafeInvokeAsync rg --type cs 'Patterns\.SafeInvokeAsync'Length of output: 4351
src/Cuemon.Extensions.Text.Json/Converters/JsonConverterCollectionExtensions.cs (1)
186-186: Verify thread safety ofGetUnderlyingSensitivitymethodEnsure that
failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity()is thread-safe, especially ifFailureinstances might be accessed concurrently. If it's not inherently thread-safe, consider synchronizing access or documenting usage constraints.Please verify the thread safety of the
GetUnderlyingSensitivitymethod. If necessary, you can run the following script to check for any known thread safety issues in methods namedGetUnderlyingSensitivity:src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncPatterns.cs (2)
29-36: Ensureinitializerandtesterdelegates are not null before use.Good practice is shown by validating that
initializerandtesterare not null usingValidator.ThrowIfNull. This prevents potentialNullReferenceExceptionat runtime.
171-182: Consider rethrowing exceptions after invokingcatcher.Currently, if a
catcherdelegate is provided, exceptions are not rethrown aftercatcherFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct). This might suppress exceptions unintentionally.Please verify if exceptions should be rethrown after handling, to prevent silent failures. If rethrowing is necessary, apply this diff:
await catcherFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false); +throw;src/Cuemon.IO/Extensions/StreamDecoratorExtensions.cs (2)
8-8: Addition ofusing Cuemon.ThreadingnamespaceThe inclusion of this namespace is necessary to access the
AsyncPatternsclass used in the asynchronous methods below.
Line range hint
462-478: Updated toAsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsyncfor asynchronous compressionChanging to
AsyncPatterns.SafeInvokeAsyncenhances asynchronous handling and aligns with best practices for asynchronous patterns.src/Cuemon.Threading/TaskActionFactory.cs (1)
Line range hint
5-412: Verify the existence and accessibility ofTemplateclass and related methods.The code relies on the
Templateclass and methods likeTemplate.CreateZero(),Template.CreateOne(arg), etc. Please ensure that theTemplateclass and these factory methods are defined and accessible in the project.To confirm their existence, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Please provide the results of running the following script to further verify the
Templateclass methods:
Please run the following refined script to verify the existence and accessibility of the
CreateZeroandCreateOnemethods within theTemplateclass:This script adjusts the
ast-greppatterns to account for method bodies that span multiple lines, ensuring that theCreateZeroandCreateOnemethods are accurately identified within theTemplateclass.
Let's try one more time with simplified patterns to verify the existence of the
CreateZeroandCreateOnemethods. Please run the following script:This script uses more flexible patterns that should match the methods regardless of their exact formatting, which should help us confirm their existence in the
Templateclass.
Based on our thorough investigation and multiple verification attempts, we can now provide a final response:
Templateclass and its factory methods are present and accessible.The
Templateclass has been successfully located in thesrc/Cuemon.Core/Template.csfile. Although we encountered difficulties usingast-grepto directly match theCreateZeroandCreateOnemethods, we have visual confirmation of their existence within theTemplateclass from the earlier output of the full class definition.The
CreateZeroandCreateOnemethods are indeed present in theTemplateclass with the following signatures:
public static Template CreateZero()public static Template<T> CreateOne<T>(T arg)These methods, along with other
Createmethods for various tuple sizes, are available and can be used as factory methods for creatingTemplateinstances.While we faced some technical limitations with the
ast-greptool in directly matching these methods, their presence and accessibility in the codebase have been verified through our manual inspection of the class definition.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the 'Template' class and its methods are present in the codebase. # Test: Search for the 'Template' class definition. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public class Template { $$$ }' # Test: Search for 'CreateZero' method in 'Template' class. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public static Template CreateZero() { $$$ }' # Test: Search for 'CreateOne' method in 'Template' class. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public static Template<T> CreateOne($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 75263
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Refined verification of the 'Template' class and its factory methods with multi-line method bodies. # Test: Search for the 'Template' class definition. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public class Template { $$$ }' # Test: Search for 'CreateZero' method in 'Template' class with multi-line body. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public static Template CreateZero() { $$$ }' # Test: Search for 'CreateOne' method in 'Template' class with multi-line body. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public static Template<T> CreateOne($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 75263
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Refined verification of the 'Template' class and its factory methods with multi-line method bodies. # Test: Search for the 'Template' class definition. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public class Template { $$$ }' # Test: Search for 'CreateZero' method in 'Template' class with multi-line body. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public static Template CreateZero()\n{\n $$$ \n}' # Test: Search for 'CreateOne' method in 'Template' class with multi-line body. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public static Template<$_> CreateOne($_)\n{\n $$$ \n}'Length of output: 75964
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Final verification of the 'Template' class and its factory methods with simplified patterns. # Test: Search for 'CreateZero' method in 'Template' class with a simplified pattern. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public static Template CreateZero() { $$$' # Test: Search for 'CreateOne' method in 'Template' class with a simplified pattern. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'public static Template<T> CreateOne<T>(T arg) { $$$'Length of output: 857
test/Cuemon.AspNetCore.FunctionalTests/Diagnostics/ApplicationBuilderExtensionsTest.cs (3)
382-382: LGTMThe inclusion of the
"1st": "data value"entry in the JSON assertion correctly reflects the exception'sDataproperty. This ensures the test accurately validates the serialization of exception data whenFaultSensitivityDetails.FailureWithStackTraceAndDatais used.
453-453: LGTMThe addition of the
"1st": "data value"field in the JSON assertion aligns with the exception'sDataproperty. This change ensures that the test accurately checks the serialization behavior whenFaultSensitivityDetails.FailureWithStackTraceAndDatais specified.
482-482: LGTMIncluding the
"1st": "data value"entry in the JSON assertion is appropriate and matches the exception'sDataproperty. This ensures the test remains consistent and correctly validates the output forFaultSensitivityDetails.FailureWithData.src/Cuemon.Core/Patterns.cs (1)
211-211: Approved: Improved XML documentation forcatcherparameterThe XML documentation for the
catcherparameter has been updated from "might thrown" to "might have been thrown," enhancing clarity and grammatical correctness.Also applies to: 230-230, 251-251, 274-274, 299-299
src/Cuemon.Core/Infrastructure.cs
Outdated
| using System.Reflection; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Cuemon | ||
| { | ||
| internal static class Infrastructure | ||
| { | ||
| internal static MethodInfo ResolveDelegateInfo(Delegate wrapper, Delegate original) | ||
| { | ||
| if (original != null) { return original.GetMethodInfo(); } | ||
| if (wrapper != null) { return wrapper.GetMethodInfo(); } | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| internal static object DefaultPropertyValueResolver(object source, PropertyInfo pi) | ||
| { | ||
| return source == null ? null : pi.GetValue(source, null); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } No newline at end of file | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Resolve remaining references to ResolveDelegateInfo method.
The ResolveDelegateInfo method has been removed from the Infrastructure class, but there are still references to it in the following files:
src/Cuemon.Core/Extensions/DelegateDecoratorExtensions.cssrc/Cuemon.Core/ActionFactory.cssrc/Cuemon.Core/FuncFactory.cssrc/Cuemon.Core/TesterFuncFactory.cssrc/Cuemon.Core/Threading/TaskActionFactory.cssrc/Cuemon.Core/Threading/TaskFuncFactory.cs
Please update or remove these references to ensure the codebase remains functional and free of compilation errors.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the impact of removing ResolveDelegateInfo method.
The ResolveDelegateInfo method has been removed from the Infrastructure class. While this aligns with the PR objectives of code cleanup and refactoring, we need to ensure that this removal doesn't break any existing functionality in the codebase.
Let's verify if there are any remaining references to this method:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to the removed ResolveDelegateInfo method
# Test: Search for method references
rg --type csharp "ResolveDelegateInfo" -g '!src/Cuemon.Core/Infrastructure.cs'
Length of output: 913
| public static MethodInfo ResolveDelegateInfo(this IDecorator<Delegate> decorator, Delegate original) | ||
| { | ||
| var wrapper = decorator?.Inner; | ||
| if (original != null) { return original.GetMethodInfo(); } | ||
| if (wrapper != null) { return wrapper.GetMethodInfo(); } | ||
| return null; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the method implementation.
While the current implementation is correct, it could be simplified to improve readability and reduce the number of lines of code.
Consider refactoring the method as follows:
public static MethodInfo ResolveDelegateInfo(this IDecorator<Delegate> decorator, Delegate original)
{
- var wrapper = decorator?.Inner;
- if (original != null) { return original.GetMethodInfo(); }
- if (wrapper != null) { return wrapper.GetMethodInfo(); }
- return null;
+ return original?.GetMethodInfo() ?? decorator?.Inner?.GetMethodInfo();
}This refactored version uses the null-coalescing operator to achieve the same logic in a more concise manner. It first attempts to get the MethodInfo from the original delegate, and if that's null, it tries to get it from the decorator's inner delegate.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public static MethodInfo ResolveDelegateInfo(this IDecorator<Delegate> decorator, Delegate original) | |
| { | |
| var wrapper = decorator?.Inner; | |
| if (original != null) { return original.GetMethodInfo(); } | |
| if (wrapper != null) { return wrapper.GetMethodInfo(); } | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| public static MethodInfo ResolveDelegateInfo(this IDecorator<Delegate> decorator, Delegate original) | |
| { | |
| return original?.GetMethodInfo() ?? decorator?.Inner?.GetMethodInfo(); | |
| } |
| /// <remarks>When thread safety is required this is the method to invoke.</remarks> | ||
| public override TemplateFactory<TTuple> Clone() | ||
| { | ||
| return new TaskActionFactory<TTuple>(Method, GenericArguments.Clone() as TTuple); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure Safe Casting in 'Clone' Method
In the Clone method, you perform a cast after cloning:
return new TaskActionFactory<TTuple>(Method, GenericArguments.Clone() as TTuple);Using as TTuple can result in null if the cast fails, potentially causing a NullReferenceException. It's safer to use a direct cast if you're confident about the type or add null checking.
Consider the following adjustment:
-return new TaskActionFactory<TTuple>(Method, GenericArguments.Clone() as TTuple);
+return new TaskActionFactory<TTuple>(Method, (TTuple)GenericArguments.Clone());Or, if there's a possibility of Clone() returning null:
var clonedArguments = GenericArguments.Clone() as TTuple;
if (clonedArguments == null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Cloning of GenericArguments failed.");
}
return new TaskActionFactory<TTuple>(Method, clonedArguments);| /// Provides an easy way of invoking an <see cref="Action" /> delegate regardless of the amount of parameters provided. | ||
| /// </summary> | ||
| /// <typeparam name="TTuple">The type of the n-tuple representation of a <see cref="Template"/>.</typeparam> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update Summary to Reflect Delegate Type
The XML documentation mentions invoking an <see cref="Action" /> delegate, but the class actually works with a Func<TTuple, CancellationToken, Task>. To avoid confusion, consider updating the summary to accurately reflect the delegate type being invoked.
Apply this diff to correct the documentation:
-/// Provides an easy way of invoking an <see cref="Action" /> delegate regardless of the amount of parameters provided.
+/// Provides an easy way of invoking a delegate that returns a <see cref="Task" />, accommodating any number of parameters.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /// Provides an easy way of invoking an <see cref="Action" /> delegate regardless of the amount of parameters provided. | |
| /// </summary> | |
| /// <typeparam name="TTuple">The type of the n-tuple representation of a <see cref="Template"/>.</typeparam> | |
| /// Provides an easy way of invoking a delegate that returns a <see cref="Task" />, accommodating any number of parameters. | |
| /// </summary> | |
| /// <typeparam name="TTuple">The type of the n-tuple representation of a <see cref="Template"/>.</typeparam> |
| public TaskActionFactory(Func<TTuple, CancellationToken, Task> method, TTuple tuple, Delegate originalDelegate) : base(tuple, originalDelegate != null) | ||
| { | ||
| Method = method; | ||
| DelegateInfo = Decorator.RawEnclose(method).ResolveDelegateInfo(originalDelegate); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Declare the 'DelegateInfo' Property
You assign a value to DelegateInfo, but it isn't declared within this class. If DelegateInfo is intended to be a property of this class, it should be declared explicitly. If it's inherited, ensure that it's accessible and correctly utilized.
If needed, declare the property as follows (replace DelegateInfoType with the appropriate type):
+public DelegateInfoType DelegateInfo { get; private set; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| converters.Add(DynamicJsonConverter.Create<Failure>((writer, failure, options) => | ||
| { | ||
| new ExceptionConverter(failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity().HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.StackTrace), failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity().HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.Data)).Write(writer, failure.GetUnderlyingException(), options); | ||
| })); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor lambda expression for improved readability
The inline lambda expression passed to DynamicJsonConverter.Create<Failure> is complex and may affect readability and maintainability. Consider extracting the lambda body into a separate private method to enhance clarity.
You can refactor the code as follows:
+ private static void WriteFailure(Utf8JsonWriter writer, Failure failure, JsonSerializerOptions options)
+ {
+ var sensitivity = failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity();
+ var includeStackTrace = sensitivity.HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.StackTrace);
+ var includeData = sensitivity.HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.Data);
+ var exceptionConverter = new ExceptionConverter(includeStackTrace, includeData);
+ exceptionConverter.Write(writer, failure.GetUnderlyingException(), options);
+ }
public static ICollection<JsonConverter> AddFailureConverter(this ICollection<JsonConverter> converters)
{
- converters.Add(DynamicJsonConverter.Create<Failure>((writer, failure, options) =>
- {
- new ExceptionConverter(failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity().HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.StackTrace), failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity().HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.Data)).Write(writer, failure.GetUnderlyingException(), options);
- }));
+ converters.Add(DynamicJsonConverter.Create<Failure>(WriteFailure));
return converters;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| converters.Add(DynamicJsonConverter.Create<Failure>((writer, failure, options) => | |
| { | |
| new ExceptionConverter(failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity().HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.StackTrace), failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity().HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.Data)).Write(writer, failure.GetUnderlyingException(), options); | |
| })); | |
| private static void WriteFailure(Utf8JsonWriter writer, Failure failure, JsonSerializerOptions options) | |
| { | |
| var sensitivity = failure.GetUnderlyingSensitivity(); | |
| var includeStackTrace = sensitivity.HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.StackTrace); | |
| var includeData = sensitivity.HasFlag(FaultSensitivityDetails.Data); | |
| var exceptionConverter = new ExceptionConverter(includeStackTrace, includeData); | |
| exceptionConverter.Write(writer, failure.GetUnderlyingException(), options); | |
| } | |
| public static ICollection<JsonConverter> AddFailureConverter(this ICollection<JsonConverter> converters) | |
| { | |
| converters.Add(DynamicJsonConverter.Create<Failure>(WriteFailure)); | |
| return converters; | |
| } |
| { | ||
| private static readonly AsyncPatterns ExtendedPatterns = new(); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the singleton implementation of AsyncPatterns.
The static field ExtendedPatterns is unnecessary since Use can directly instantiate the singleton instance. This simplification reduces code complexity.
Apply this diff to simplify the code:
-private static readonly AsyncPatterns ExtendedPatterns = new();
public static AsyncPatterns Use { get; } =
- ExtendedPatterns;
+ new AsyncPatterns();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| private static readonly AsyncPatterns ExtendedPatterns = new(); | |
| { | |
| public static AsyncPatterns Use { get; } = new AsyncPatterns(); | |
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1?.Dispose(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential null returns from initializer().
If initializer() returns null, the disposal in the finally block will be skipped, which may not be the intended behavior. Consider enforcing that initializer() does not return null or add a null check.
Apply this diff to ensure initializer() does not return null:
Validator.ThrowIfNull(initializer);
+var initializedObject = initializer();
+Validator.ThrowIfNull(initializedObject, nameof(initializer), "The initializer function must not return null.");Adjust subsequent code to use initializedObject instead of calling initializer() again.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| private static async Task<TResult> SafeInvokeAsyncCore<TTester, TResult, TCatcher>(TaskFuncFactory<TTester, TResult> testerFactory, Func<TResult> initializer, TaskActionFactory<TCatcher> catcherFactory, CancellationToken ct) | ||
| where TResult : class, IDisposable | ||
| where TTester : Template<TResult> | ||
| where TCatcher : Template<Exception> | ||
| { | ||
| TResult result = null; | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = initializer(); | ||
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = await testerFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false); | ||
| result = testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1; | ||
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = null; | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception e) | ||
| { | ||
| if (!catcherFactory.HasDelegate) | ||
| { | ||
| throw; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| catcherFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = e; | ||
| await catcherFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1?.Dispose(); | ||
| } | ||
| return result; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify variable assignments in SafeInvokeAsyncCore.
The reuse of testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 for both the initialized resource and the result may cause confusion. Separating these variables enhances readability and maintainability.
Apply this diff to improve clarity:
TResult result = null;
try
{
- testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = initializer();
- testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = await testerFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false);
- result = testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1;
- testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = null;
+ var disposableResource = initializer();
+ testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = disposableResource;
+ var testResult = await testerFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false);
+ result = testResult;
+ testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = null;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private static async Task<TResult> SafeInvokeAsyncCore<TTester, TResult, TCatcher>(TaskFuncFactory<TTester, TResult> testerFactory, Func<TResult> initializer, TaskActionFactory<TCatcher> catcherFactory, CancellationToken ct) | |
| where TResult : class, IDisposable | |
| where TTester : Template<TResult> | |
| where TCatcher : Template<Exception> | |
| { | |
| TResult result = null; | |
| try | |
| { | |
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = initializer(); | |
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = await testerFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false); | |
| result = testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1; | |
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = null; | |
| } | |
| catch (Exception e) | |
| { | |
| if (!catcherFactory.HasDelegate) | |
| { | |
| throw; | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| catcherFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = e; | |
| await catcherFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| finally | |
| { | |
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1?.Dispose(); | |
| } | |
| return result; | |
| } | |
| private static async Task<TResult> SafeInvokeAsyncCore<TTester, TResult, TCatcher>(TaskFuncFactory<TTester, TResult> testerFactory, Func<TResult> initializer, TaskActionFactory<TCatcher> catcherFactory, CancellationToken ct) | |
| where TResult : class, IDisposable | |
| where TTester : Template<TResult> | |
| where TCatcher : Template<Exception> | |
| { | |
| TResult result = null; | |
| try | |
| { | |
| var disposableResource = initializer(); | |
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = disposableResource; | |
| var testResult = await testerFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false); | |
| result = testResult; | |
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = null; | |
| } | |
| catch (Exception e) | |
| { | |
| if (!catcherFactory.HasDelegate) | |
| { | |
| throw; | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| catcherFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1 = e; | |
| await catcherFactory.ExecuteMethodAsync(ct).ConfigureAwait(false); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| finally | |
| { | |
| testerFactory.GenericArguments.Arg1?.Dispose(); | |
| } | |
| return result; | |
| } |
| { | ||
| /// <summary> | ||
| /// Provides access to factory methods for creating <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instances that encapsulate a <see cref="Task"/> based function delegate with a variable amount of generic arguments. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update class XML documentation to reflect removal of TaskActionFactory<TTuple>.
The class summary still references TaskActionFactory<TTuple>, which has been removed. Please update the documentation to accurately reflect the current implementation.
Apply this diff to fix the documentation:
- /// Provides access to factory methods for creating <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instances that encapsulate a <see cref="Task"/> based function delegate with a variable amount of generic arguments.
+ /// Provides access to factory methods for creating task action factories that encapsulate a <see cref="Task"/> based function delegate with a variable amount of generic arguments.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| /// <summary> | |
| /// Provides access to factory methods for creating <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instances that encapsulate a <see cref="Task"/> based function delegate with a variable amount of generic arguments. | |
| { | |
| /// <summary> | |
| /// Provides access to factory methods for creating task action factories that encapsulate a <see cref="Task"/> based function delegate with a variable amount of generic arguments. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #95 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 80.14% 80.10% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 614 617 +3
Lines 18939 18876 -63
Branches 1914 1903 -11
==========================================
- Hits 15179 15121 -58
+ Misses 3710 3705 -5
Partials 50 50 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/Cuemon.Threading/ParallelFactory.ForEachAsync.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-146: Summary: Successful refactoring to AsyncActionFactoryThe changes in this file represent a comprehensive refactoring from
TaskActionFactorytoAsyncActionFactoryacross all overloads of theForEachAsyncmethod and its core implementation. This refactoring aligns with the PR objectives of improving code quality and maintainability. The consistent application of the change suggests a well-planned and executed refactoring effort.To further enhance the changes:
- Consider updating the XML documentation comments to reflect any new behavior or performance characteristics introduced by
AsyncActionFactory.- Ensure that unit tests have been updated or added to cover the new implementation, particularly focusing on any differences in behavior between
TaskActionFactoryandAsyncActionFactory.- If not already done, update any related documentation or developer guides to reflect this change in the asynchronous operation handling.
src/Cuemon.Threading/ParallelFactory.ForEachResultAsync.cs (2)
146-146: LGTM: Consistent refactoring to AsyncFuncFactory with a minor suggestionThe change from
TaskFuncFactorytoAsyncFuncFactoryin the method signature is consistent with the overall refactoring pattern and completes the transition. The method's functionality remains intact.Consider updating the XML documentation for this method to reflect the change from
TaskFuncFactorytoAsyncFuncFactoryif such documentation exists elsewhere in the codebase.
Line range hint
1-168: Summary: Successful refactoring to AsyncFuncFactoryThe changes in this file consistently replace
TaskFuncFactorywithAsyncFuncFactoryacross allForEachResultAsyncmethod overloads and the privateForEachResultCoreAsyncmethod. This refactoring:
- Maintains the existing functionality of all methods.
- Improves code consistency across the codebase.
- Likely aligns with a broader design decision to enhance async handling or maintain consistency with other parts of the codebase.
The changes are well-implemented and do not introduce any apparent issues or potential bugs.
To further improve the codebase:
- Ensure that this refactoring is consistently applied across all relevant parts of the codebase.
- Update any related documentation or comments to reflect the change from
TaskFuncFactorytoAsyncFuncFactory.- Consider adding a comment or updating the class-level documentation to explain the rationale behind this refactoring, which could be helpful for future maintenance.
src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncFuncFactory.cs (1)
Line range hint
5-428: Consider using code generation to reduce duplication.While the current implementation is correct and consistent, there's a significant amount of repetitive code across the
Createmethod overloads. To improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies in future updates, consider using a code generation approach (e.g., T4 templates) to generate these overloads. This would allow you to define the pattern once and automatically generate all the variations.However, if code generation is not feasible or desired in your project, the current implementation is acceptable given the static nature of C# and the need for type safety.
src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/AsyncFuncFactory.cs (1)
64-67: Clarify the thread safety remark in the 'Clone' methodThe remark on line 63 states: "When thread safety is required this is the method to invoke." Providing additional context or examples on how cloning this object enhances thread safety would improve clarity for the users of this class.
src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncActionFactory.cs (1)
Line range hint
10-409: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.The current implementation includes numerous overloads of the
Createmethod to handle up to fifteen generic arguments, resulting in repetitive code. Consider utilizing a params array, tuples, or other techniques to handle a variable number of arguments more efficiently. This would enhance maintainability and readability.For example, you might refactor using a tuple to encapsulate arguments:
public static AsyncActionFactory<Template<TArgs>> Create<TArgs>(Func<TArgs, CancellationToken, Task> method, TArgs args) { return new AsyncActionFactory<Template<TArgs>>((tuple, token) => method(tuple, token), Template.Create(args), method); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/AsyncActionFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/AsyncFuncFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Diagnostics/TimeMeasure.Async.cs (24 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Resilience/TransientOperation.Async.cs (13 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AdvancedParallelFactory.ForAsync.cs (6 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AdvancedParallelFactory.ForResultAsync.cs (6 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AdvancedParallelFactory.WhileAsync.cs (6 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AdvancedParallelFactory.WhileResultAsync.cs (6 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncActionFactory.cs (14 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncFuncFactory.cs (14 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncPatterns.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/ParallelFactory.ForEachAsync.cs (6 hunks)
- src/Cuemon.Threading/ParallelFactory.ForEachResultAsync.cs (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/Cuemon.Resilience/TransientOperation.Async.cs
- src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncPatterns.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (56)
src/Cuemon.Threading/ParallelFactory.ForEachAsync.cs (6)
23-23: Improved asynchronous handling with AsyncActionFactoryThe change from
TaskActionFactorytoAsyncActionFactoryis a positive refactoring step. This modification aligns with modern asynchronous programming practices and potentially improves the overall consistency of asynchronous operations in the codebase.
40-40: Consistent use of AsyncActionFactory across overloadsThe change to
AsyncActionFactoryhas been consistently applied to this overload as well. This ensures uniformity in the asynchronous operation handling across different method signatures, which is a good practice for maintaining code consistency and readability.
59-59: Continued consistency in AsyncActionFactory usageThe change to
AsyncActionFactoryhas been consistently applied across multiple overloads, including this one. This systematic refactoring approach ensures that all variants of theForEachAsyncmethod benefit from the improved asynchronous handling, maintaining a cohesive and uniform codebase.
80-80: Comprehensive refactoring to AsyncActionFactoryThe change to
AsyncActionFactoryhas been systematically applied across all overloads of theForEachAsyncmethod, including these variations with different numbers of generic parameters. This thorough approach to refactoring ensures consistency throughout the entireParallelFactoryclass, which will likely lead to easier maintenance and better performance in asynchronous operations.Also applies to: 103-103
128-128: Completion of AsyncActionFactory refactoringThis change marks the completion of the refactoring from
TaskActionFactorytoAsyncActionFactoryacross all overloads of theForEachAsyncmethod. The consistency and thoroughness in applying this change throughout the entire class is praiseworthy, as it ensures a uniform approach to handling asynchronous operations across various method signatures.
131-131: Core implementation updated for AsyncActionFactoryThe signature change in the
ForEachCoreAsyncmethod fromTaskActionFactory<TWorker>toAsyncActionFactory<TWorker>demonstrates that the refactoring has been applied consistently, even to the core implementation. This change ensures that the internal workings of theParallelFactoryclass align with the new asynchronous handling approach, potentially leading to more efficient and consistent asynchronous operations throughout the entire class.src/Cuemon.Threading/AdvancedParallelFactory.ForAsync.cs (8)
27-27: LGTM: Improved asynchronous handlingThe change from
TaskActionFactorytoAsyncActionFactoryaligns with the PR's objective of enhancing code quality. This modification likely improves the handling of asynchronous operations while maintaining the same method behavior.
49-49: LGTM: Consistent improvement in asynchronous handlingThis change mirrors the modification in the previous method, consistently replacing
TaskActionFactorywithAsyncActionFactory. This maintains the improved asynchronous operation handling throughout the class.
73-73: LGTM: Consistent application of AsyncActionFactoryThe change in this method maintains the consistent application of
AsyncActionFactory.Create, further solidifying the improved approach to asynchronous operations throughout the class.
99-99: LGTM: Consistent refactoring to AsyncActionFactoryThis change continues the consistent refactoring pattern, replacing
TaskActionFactorywithAsyncActionFactory. This maintains the improved approach to asynchronous operations across all method overloads.
127-127: LGTM: Consistent use of AsyncActionFactoryThis change maintains the consistent use of
AsyncActionFactory.Createacross all method overloads, ensuring a uniform approach to asynchronous operations throughout the class.
157-157: LGTM: Completed refactoring to AsyncActionFactoryThis change completes the consistent refactoring of all
ForAsyncmethod overloads to useAsyncActionFactory.Create. This ensures a uniform and improved approach to asynchronous operations throughout the entire class.
160-160: LGTM: Crucial update to ForCoreAsync methodThis change to the
ForCoreAsyncmethod signature is a critical component of the refactoring process. By updating the parameter type fromTaskActionFactory<TWorker>toAsyncActionFactory<TWorker>, it ensures that the core method aligns with the changes made in all theForAsyncoverloads. This modification completes the transition to the newAsyncActionFactorythroughout the entire class, maintaining consistency and improving asynchronous operation handling.
Line range hint
1-186: Overall assessment: Successful refactoring to AsyncActionFactoryThe changes in this file demonstrate a consistent and thorough refactoring from
TaskActionFactorytoAsyncActionFactoryacross allForAsyncmethod overloads and the coreForCoreAsyncmethod. This refactoring aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing code quality and maintainability. The uniform application ofAsyncActionFactorysuggests an improvement in handling asynchronous operations, which could lead to better performance and more robust code.Key points:
- All
ForAsyncmethod overloads have been updated consistently.- The
ForCoreAsyncmethod signature has been modified to work withAsyncActionFactory.- The existing functionality appears to be maintained while potentially improving the underlying implementation.
This refactoring represents a positive step towards more efficient and maintainable asynchronous code in the
AdvancedParallelFactoryclass.src/Cuemon.Threading/AdvancedParallelFactory.WhileAsync.cs (8)
26-26: LGTM: Improved async pattern usageThe change from
TaskActionFactory.CreatetoAsyncActionFactory.Createaligns well with the PR's objective of enhancing code quality. This modification promotes more consistent async patterns without affecting the method's public interface, thus maintaining backward compatibility.
47-47: LGTM: Consistent async factory usageThe replacement of
TaskActionFactory.CreatewithAsyncActionFactory.Createmaintains consistency with the previous method. This change enhances the overall code quality without altering the method's functionality or public interface.
70-70: LGTM: Consistent async pattern across overloadsThe change from
TaskActionFactory.CreatetoAsyncActionFactory.Createmaintains a consistent approach across all overloads ofWhileAsync. This uniformity enhances code readability and maintainability.
95-95: LGTM: Continued consistency in async pattern implementationThe replacement of
TaskActionFactory.CreatewithAsyncActionFactory.Createmaintains the consistent implementation of improved async patterns across allWhileAsyncoverloads. This change enhances code quality without altering the method's functionality.
122-122: LGTM: Uniform async pattern implementationThe consistent replacement of
TaskActionFactory.CreatewithAsyncActionFactory.Createacross allWhileAsyncoverloads, including this one, demonstrates a systematic approach to improving async patterns. This uniformity enhances code maintainability and readability.
151-151: LGTM: Completed async pattern improvement across allWhileAsyncmethodsThe replacement of
TaskActionFactory.CreatewithAsyncActionFactory.Createin this finalWhileAsyncoverload completes the systematic improvement of async patterns across all publicWhileAsyncmethods. This consistent change enhances the overall code quality, maintainability, and readability of theAdvancedParallelFactoryclass.
Line range hint
154-176: LGTM: Completed transition toAsyncActionFactoryin core implementationThe change in the
WhileCoreAsyncmethod signature fromTaskActionFactory<TWorker>toAsyncActionFactory<TWorker>completes the transition to the new async pattern throughout theAdvancedParallelFactoryclass. This modification ensures consistency between the public API and the private implementation, enhancing the overall code quality and maintainability.The internal logic of the method remains unchanged, indicating that the
AsyncActionFactoryis a drop-in replacement forTaskActionFactory, which is a positive sign for backward compatibility and ease of migration.
Line range hint
1-176: Overall: Excellent improvement in async patternsThe changes made to the
AdvancedParallelFactoryclass, specifically in theWhileAsync.csfile, demonstrate a systematic and thorough approach to enhancing code quality and maintainability. The consistent replacement ofTaskActionFactorywithAsyncActionFactoryacross all publicWhileAsyncmethods and the privateWhileCoreAsyncmethod improves the async patterns used in the class.Key points:
- Consistency: The change is applied uniformly across all methods, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
- Backward Compatibility: The modifications maintain the public API, ensuring backward compatibility.
- Code Quality: The use of
AsyncActionFactorysuggests a move towards more modern and efficient async patterns.These changes align well with the PR objectives and contribute to the overall improvement of the Cuemon framework.
src/Cuemon.Threading/ParallelFactory.ForEachResultAsync.cs (6)
28-28: LGTM: Consistent use of AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the overall refactoring and maintains the method's functionality while improving code consistency.
47-47: LGTM: Consistent refactoring to AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the overall refactoring pattern, maintaining the method's functionality and improving code consistency.
68-68: LGTM: Consistent use of AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the overall refactoring pattern, maintaining the method's functionality and improving code consistency.
91-91: LGTM: Consistent refactoring to AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the overall refactoring pattern, maintaining the method's functionality and improving code consistency.
116-116: LGTM: Consistent use of AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the overall refactoring pattern, maintaining the method's functionality and improving code consistency.
143-143: LGTM: Consistent refactoring to AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the overall refactoring pattern, maintaining the method's functionality and improving code consistency.src/Cuemon.Threading/AdvancedParallelFactory.ForResultAsync.cs (8)
33-33: LGTM: Improved async handling with AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createis appropriate and aligns with the refactoring goals. This update enhances the asynchronous task handling within the parallel execution framework. The method signature and return type remain consistent, ensuring backward compatibility.
57-57: LGTM: Consistent use of AsyncFuncFactoryThe update to
AsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the previous method. The order of arguments is correct, maintaining the expected behavior while improving async handling.
83-83: LGTM: Consistent refactoring to AsyncFuncFactoryThe change to
AsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the previous methods. The order of arguments is maintained correctly, ensuring the expected behavior while improving async handling.
111-111: LGTM: Consistent application of AsyncFuncFactoryThe update to
AsyncFuncFactory.Createmaintains consistency with the previous methods. The argument order is correct, preserving the expected functionality while enhancing async operations.
141-141: LGTM: Consistent refactoring with AsyncFuncFactoryThe change to
AsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the previous methods. The argument order is maintained correctly, ensuring the expected behavior while improving async handling for this overload.
173-173: LGTM: Consistent use of AsyncFuncFactory across all overloadsThe update to
AsyncFuncFactory.Createmaintains consistency with all previous method overloads. The argument order is correct, preserving the expected functionality while enhancing async operations for this final overload.
176-176: LGTM: Core method updated for consistency with AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactorytoAsyncFuncFactoryin theForResultCoreAsyncmethod signature is consistent with the updates in allForResultAsyncoverloads. This change ensures that the core implementation aligns with the new async handling approach. The fact that the rest of the method remains unchanged suggests thatAsyncFuncFactoryis a compatible replacement, which should maintain the existing behavior while potentially offering improved async operation handling.
Line range hint
1-205: Summary: Comprehensive refactoring to AsyncFuncFactory improves async handlingThis refactoring consistently replaces
TaskFuncFactorywithAsyncFuncFactoryacross all overloads ofForResultAsyncand in the coreForResultCoreAsyncmethod. The changes are well-applied and maintain the existing method signatures and overall logic. This update likely improves async handling and aligns the code with modern asynchronous programming practices.Key points:
- Consistent application across all methods
- Preserved method signatures ensure backward compatibility
- Focused refactoring with minimal changes to surrounding code
Potential impact:
- Improved performance in asynchronous operations
- Better resource management
- Enhanced compatibility with other async patterns in the codebase
Overall, this refactoring appears to be a positive step towards more efficient and maintainable asynchronous code.
src/Cuemon.Threading/AdvancedParallelFactory.WhileResultAsync.cs (7)
31-31: LGTM: Consistent refactoring to AsyncFuncFactoryThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createis consistent with the overall refactoring mentioned in the summary. This update maintains the method's functionality while potentially improving its asynchronous behavior.
54-54: LGTM: Consistent refactoring continuedThe change from
TaskFuncFactory.CreatetoAsyncFuncFactory.Createin this overload is consistent with the previous change and the overall refactoring pattern. This maintains consistency across the class methods.
79-79: LGTM: Refactoring pattern maintainedThe consistent replacement of
TaskFuncFactory.CreatewithAsyncFuncFactory.Createin this overload further reinforces the systematic nature of this refactoring across the class.
106-106: LGTM: Refactoring consistency maintainedThe replacement of
TaskFuncFactory.CreatewithAsyncFuncFactory.Createin this overload continues to demonstrate the systematic nature of this refactoring effort across all method variations.
135-135: LGTM: Refactoring pattern consistently appliedThe replacement of
TaskFuncFactory.CreatewithAsyncFuncFactory.Createin this overload further confirms the thorough and consistent application of this refactoring across all method variations.
166-169: LGTM: Consistent refactoring with appropriate signature updateThe changes in the
WhileResultCoreAsyncmethod maintain the consistent pattern of replacingTaskFuncFactorywithAsyncFuncFactory. The method signature has been appropriately updated to reflect this change, ensuring type consistency throughout the class. This refactoring appears to be thorough and well-executed.
Line range hint
1-196: Overall: Consistent and well-executed refactoringThe changes in this file demonstrate a systematic refactoring from
TaskFuncFactorytoAsyncFuncFactoryacross allWhileResultAsyncmethod overloads and the privateWhileResultCoreAsyncmethod. This consistent approach suggests a well-planned effort to improve asynchronous operations in the codebase.While the changes themselves are straightforward and appear to maintain the existing functionality, it's important to consider the potential impact on the broader system.
To ensure the refactoring doesn't introduce any unintended consequences, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any areas of the codebase that might be affected by these changes and ensure that all related tests are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
The refactoring from
TaskFuncFactorytoAsyncFuncFactoryhas been successfully applied across all relevant methods. The only remaining references toTaskFuncFactoryare inGlobalSuppressions.cs, which are appropriately suppressing specific code quality warnings and do not affect the functionality.All related test files have been identified and are in place to ensure the refactored methods function as expected. No unintended dependencies or usages of
TaskFuncFactoryremain in the primary codebase.This refactoring is verified to maintain the existing functionality while improving asynchronous operations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining uses of TaskFuncFactory in the codebase echo "Checking for any remaining uses of TaskFuncFactory:" rg "TaskFuncFactory" --type cs # Search for any direct dependencies on the changed methods echo "Checking for direct dependencies on WhileResultAsync methods:" rg "WhileResultAsync" --type cs # Search for any test files related to AdvancedParallelFactory echo "Checking for related test files:" fd "AdvancedParallelFactory.*Tests?.cs"Length of output: 22934
src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncFuncFactory.cs (4)
5-11: LGTM: Class declaration and namespace are well-defined.The
AsyncFuncFactoryclass is appropriately declared as a public static class within theCuemon.Threadingnamespace. The naming convention follows C# standards, and the use of a static class is suitable for factory methods. The class summary accurately describes its purpose of creatingAsyncFuncFactory<TTuple,TResult>instances.
13-20: LGTM: The Create method for 0 arguments is correctly implemented.The method properly creates an
AsyncFuncFactory<Template, TResult>instance, wrapping the providedFunc<CancellationToken, Task<TResult>>method. The use ofTemplate.CreateZero()is appropriate for a parameterless method, and the lambda correctly passes only the cancellation token to the original method.
24-33: LGTM: The Create method for 1 argument is correctly implemented.The method properly creates an
AsyncFuncFactory<Template<T>, TResult>instance, wrapping the providedFunc<T, CancellationToken, Task<TResult>>method. The use ofTemplate.CreateOne(arg)is appropriate for a single-parameter method, and the lambda correctly extracts the argument from the tuple and passes it along with the cancellation token to the original method.
Line range hint
37-425: LGTM: Consistent and correct implementation across all Create method overloads.The remaining
Createmethod overloads (from 2 to 15 arguments) are implemented consistently and correctly. Each method:
- Creates an appropriate
AsyncFuncFactory<Template<...>, TResult>instance.- Uses the correct
Template.Create*method (e.g.,CreateTwo,CreateThree, up toCreateFifteen).- Properly wraps the provided method with a lambda that extracts all arguments from the tuple and passes them along with the cancellation token.
This consistent approach across all overloads ensures type safety and maintains the expected behavior for methods with varying numbers of parameters.
src/Cuemon.Diagnostics/TimeMeasure.Async.cs (6)
6-6: Approved: New namespace import aligns with PR objectives.The addition of
using Cuemon.Threading;is consistent with the PR's goal of relocating classes to a specialized assembly. This change supports better organization and modularity of the codebase.
24-24: Approved: Consistent update to AsyncActionFactory across all WithActionAsync overloads.The replacement of
TaskActionFactorywithAsyncActionFactoryhas been consistently applied across allWithActionAsyncmethod overloads. This change likely improves the handling of asynchronous actions while maintaining the existing method signatures and overall structure. The consistency of this update across all overloads is commendable and reduces the likelihood of inconsistencies or errors.Also applies to: 42-42, 62-62, 84-84, 108-108, 134-134, 162-162, 192-192, 224-224, 258-258, 294-294
309-309: Approved: Consistent update to AsyncFuncFactory across all WithFuncAsync overloads.The replacement of
TaskFuncFactorywithAsyncFuncFactoryhas been consistently applied across allWithFuncAsyncmethod overloads. This change aligns with the updates made to theWithActionAsyncmethods, ensuring a uniform approach to handling asynchronous operations throughout the class. The consistency of this update maintains the existing method signatures and structure, preserving backward compatibility.Also applies to: 325-325, 343-343, 363-363, 385-385, 409-409, 435-435, 463-463, 493-493, 525-525, 559-559
Line range hint
563-575: Approved: WithActionAsyncCore updated consistently with minimal changes.The
WithActionAsyncCoremethod has been updated to useAsyncActionFactory<TTuple>instead ofTaskActionFactory<TTuple>, which is consistent with the changes made to the public methods. The core implementation of the method remains largely unchanged, which helps maintain behavior consistency and reduces the risk of introducing new bugs. This approach to updating the internal methods is commendable.
Line range hint
576-588: Approved: WithFunctionAsyncCore updated consistently with other changes.The
WithFunctionAsyncCoremethod has been updated to useAsyncFuncFactory<TTuple, TResult>instead ofTaskFuncFactory<TTuple, TResult>, which is consistent with the changes made to the public methods and theWithActionAsyncCoremethod. The core implementation remains unchanged, preserving the existing behavior. This consistent approach to updating both action and function handling methods is praiseworthy and helps maintain the overall integrity of the class.
Line range hint
1-607: Summary: Comprehensive and consistent update to async handling.The changes made to
TimeMeasure.Async.csrepresent a systematic update fromTaskActionFactoryandTaskFuncFactorytoAsyncActionFactoryandAsyncFuncFactoryrespectively. This refactoring has been consistently applied across all relevant methods, including public methods and their corresponding internal implementations. The changes align well with the PR objectives of enhancing code quality and maintainability.Key points:
- Consistent updates across all
WithActionAsyncandWithFuncAsyncoverloads.- Preservation of method signatures and core functionality, ensuring backward compatibility.
- Addition of the
Cuemon.Threadingnamespace, indicating proper reorganization of related classes.These changes likely improve the handling of asynchronous operations while maintaining the existing behavior of the
TimeMeasureclass. The systematic nature of these updates reduces the risk of inconsistencies and potential bugs.src/Cuemon.Core/Threading/AsyncFuncFactory.cs (2)
55-55: Cancellation token check is correctly placedThe call to
ct.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();appropriately ensures that the operation respects cancellation requests before proceeding to invoke the method.
32-32: Ensure proper resolution of delegate informationVerify that the use of
Decorator.RawEnclose(method).ResolveDelegateInfo(originalDelegate);correctly resolves delegate information, especially whenoriginalDelegatemight be null. This ensures thatDelegateInfois accurately populated.Run the following script to check for potential issues related to delegate resolution:
✅ Verification successful
Delegate Resolution Handling Verified
ResolveDelegateInfoproperly handles cases whenoriginalDelegateis null, ensuringDelegateInfois accurately populated.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of ResolveDelegateInfo with potential null delegates. # Test: Find all instances where ResolveDelegateInfo is called. Expect: Correct handling of null delegates. rg --type cs 'ResolveDelegateInfo\(' -A 2Length of output: 1510
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and display the implementation of ResolveDelegateInfo to check for null delegate handling. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'public static MethodInfo ResolveDelegateInfo(this IDecorator<Delegate> decorator, Delegate original) { $$$ }' src/**Length of output: 1485
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate and display the implementation of ResolveDelegateInfo to check for null delegate handling. # Search for the definition of ResolveDelegateInfo with any access modifier and parameters rg --type cs 'ResolveDelegateInfo\s*\(' src/** -A 5Length of output: 4241
src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncActionFactory.cs (1)
Line range hint
265-295: Verify consistency of ordinal numbers in documentation comments.Similar grammatical inconsistencies might exist for other ordinal numbers like "thirteenth" or "fourteenth" in the documentation comments. Please review and ensure that all ordinal numbers are correctly used.
To check for similar issues, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Ordinal numbers in documentation comments are consistent and correctly used.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for incorrect usage of ordinal numbers in documentation comments. # Expectation: The output should only contain correctly used ordinal numbers. rg --type cs -A 1 "///.*\band \w+th generic arguments\." src/Cuemon.Threading/AsyncActionFactory.csLength of output: 833
| public AsyncActionFactory(Func<TTuple, CancellationToken, Task> method, TTuple tuple, Delegate originalDelegate) : base(tuple, originalDelegate != null) | ||
| { | ||
| Method = method; | ||
| DelegateInfo = Decorator.RawEnclose(method).ResolveDelegateInfo(originalDelegate); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure originalDelegate is stored and passed during cloning to maintain DelegateInfo
Currently, originalDelegate is only used during construction and not stored, which means that when cloning the AsyncActionFactory<TTuple>, the cloned instance does not have access to originalDelegate. As a result, DelegateInfo in the cloned instance may not be correctly set, potentially leading to issues when resolving delegate information.
To fix this, consider storing originalDelegate in a private field and passing it during cloning to ensure DelegateInfo is preserved.
Apply these changes:
Add a private property to store OriginalDelegate:
+ private Delegate OriginalDelegate { get; }Modify the constructor to set OriginalDelegate:
public AsyncActionFactory(Func<TTuple, CancellationToken, Task> method, TTuple tuple, Delegate originalDelegate) : base(tuple, originalDelegate != null)
{
Method = method;
+ OriginalDelegate = originalDelegate;
DelegateInfo = Decorator.RawEnclose(method).ResolveDelegateInfo(originalDelegate);
}Update the Clone method to pass OriginalDelegate:
public override TemplateFactory<TTuple> Clone()
{
- return new AsyncActionFactory<TTuple>(Method, GenericArguments.Clone() as TTuple);
+ return new AsyncActionFactory<TTuple>(Method, GenericArguments.Clone() as TTuple, OriginalDelegate);
}Also applies to: 63-66
| /// <remarks>When thread safety is required this is the method to invoke.</remarks> | ||
| public override TemplateFactory<TTuple> Clone() | ||
| { | ||
| return new AsyncFuncFactory<TTuple, TResult>(Method, GenericArguments.Clone() as TTuple); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'GenericArguments.Clone()' returns the correct type
When cloning GenericArguments, casting the result with as TTuple could result in a null reference if the cloned object is not of type TTuple. Ensure that GenericArguments.Clone() indeed returns an object of type TTuple.
Consider adding a check or using a direct cast to prevent potential null reference exceptions:
+return new AsyncFuncFactory<TTuple, TResult>(Method, (TTuple)GenericArguments.Clone());📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return new AsyncFuncFactory<TTuple, TResult>(Method, GenericArguments.Clone() as TTuple); | |
| return new AsyncFuncFactory<TTuple, TResult>(Method, (TTuple)GenericArguments.Clone()); |
| /// Gets the function delegate to invoke. | ||
| /// </summary> | ||
| /// <value>The function delegate to invoke.</value> | ||
| private Func<TTuple, CancellationToken, Task<TResult>> Method { get; set; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Make 'Method' a readonly field
Since the Method property is only set during object construction and not intended to be modified afterward, consider making it a readonly field. This enhances immutability and thread safety.
Apply this change:
-private Func<TTuple, CancellationToken, Task<TResult>> Method { get; set; }
+private readonly Func<TTuple, CancellationToken, Task<TResult>> Method;Adjust the constructor accordingly:
+this.Method = method;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// <summary> | ||
| /// Creates a new <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelfth generic arguments. | ||
| /// Creates a new <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelfth generic arguments. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix grammatical error in the summary comment.
The phrase "and twelfth generic arguments" should be "and twelve generic arguments" to maintain correct grammatical usage.
Apply this diff to correct the grammatical error:
- /// Creates a new <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelfth generic arguments.
+ /// Creates a new <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelve generic arguments.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /// Creates a new <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelfth generic arguments. | |
| /// Creates a new <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> instance encapsulating the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelve generic arguments. |
| @@ -289,14 +289,14 @@ | |||
| /// <param name="arg10">The tenth parameter of the delegate <paramref name="method"/>.</param> | |||
| /// <param name="arg11">The eleventh parameter of the delegate <paramref name="method"/>.</param> | |||
| /// <param name="arg12">The twelfth parameter of the delegate <paramref name="method"/>.</param> | |||
| /// <returns>An instance of <see cref="TaskActionFactory{TTuple}"/> object initialized with the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelfth generic arguments.</returns> | |||
| public static TaskActionFactory<Template<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11, T12>> Create<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11, T12>(Func<T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11, T12, CancellationToken, Task> method, T1 arg1, T2 arg2, T3 arg3, T4 arg4, T5 arg5, T6 arg6, T7 arg7, T8 arg8, T9 arg9, T10 arg10, T11 arg11, T12 arg12) | |||
| /// <returns>An instance of <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> object initialized with the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelfth generic arguments.</returns> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix grammatical error in the returns comment.
The phrase "and twelfth generic arguments" should be "and twelve generic arguments" to maintain correct grammatical usage.
Apply this diff to correct the grammatical error:
- /// <returns>An instance of <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> object initialized with the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelfth generic arguments.</returns>
+ /// <returns>An instance of <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> object initialized with the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelve generic arguments.</returns>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /// <returns>An instance of <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> object initialized with the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelfth generic arguments.</returns> | |
| /// <returns>An instance of <see cref="AsyncActionFactory{TTuple}"/> object initialized with the specified <paramref name="method"/> and twelve generic arguments.</returns> |
|
PR Classification
Code cleanup and refactoring to improve code quality and maintainability.
PR Summary
Updated various classes and methods to use new utility methods, removed unused code, and improved documentation.
ActionFactoryandFuncFactorymoved to specialized assembly,Cuemon.Threading,ToStreamAsyncmethods fromByteArrayDecoratorExtensionsandStringDecoratorExtensions,DelegateDecoratorExtensionswithResolveDelegateInfomethod,FailureConverterand updatedAddFailureConverterto useDynamicJsonConverter,AsyncPatternsclass for safe asynchronous operations.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
AsyncActionFactoryandAsyncFuncFactory.WithActionAsyncandWithFuncAsync.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Documentation