glsl-in: Fix position propagation in lowering #2079
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When lowering `Select` expressions the position could be wrongfully
updated from `AccessBase { constant_index: false }` to
`AccessBase { constant_index: true }` this caused dynamic indexing
in an array behind a structure to fail if it was stored in a constant.
Furthermore the position could also be updated from `Rhs` to
`AccessBase`, this could cause issues because `AccessBase` doesn't
load variables (which `Rhs` does), so accessing a member from a
structure behind a pointer would return the wrong result.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When lowering
Selectexpressions the position could be wrongfully updated fromAccessBase { constant_index: false }toAccessBase { constant_index: true }this caused dynamic indexing in an array behind a structure to fail if it was stored in a constant.Furthermore the position could also be updated from
RhstoAccessBase, this could cause issues becauseAccessBasedoesn't load variables (whichRhsdoes), so accessing a member from a structure behind a pointer would return the wrong result.