-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GCP Cloud Functions #529
GCP Cloud Functions #529
Conversation
Now missing some tests, and a refactor for the part I copied over from ASP.NET Core, to be reused there and avoid that duplication and setting sdk-name, and packages |
Do you have some analyzer that requires you to write |
@Tyrrrz .editorconfig Strong feels against this? |
Yes, I don't think it adds value. It makes sense for pure functions (i.e. marked with I can't imagine a situation where that rule is helpful. |
Discarding a |
Work around on msbuild can be deleted: GoogleCloudPlatform/functions-framework-dotnet#145 |
Not sure about build, but Rider will definitely warn against it. If Task is the only such example, it doesn't make sense to add noise for all other types of expressions. |
ALso it becomes clear that it's not an accident that the return isn't being used. If that's just something that bothers you, feel free to open a PR deleting all cases and dropping the |
Hit this GoogleCloudPlatform/functions-framework-dotnet#145 while trying this out.