-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ability to filter redundant annotations #43
Comments
Just to clarify, we're talking about a new field that is just binary? A la "is_obsolete"?. If so, I'd rather get it in sooner rather than later (even if we don't load it) since I'll be doing another schema update process soon for the complex annotations. |
After conversation: add "is_redundant_for" to annotation schema. |
Added to schema, but not loaded yet. |
Reminder note to self: for bioentity docs we should always filter redundant annotations in the individual lists |
If I'm following you, I'm not sure how this would work without a separate associated term list for every type of redundancy. |
This would only be for the most general kind of redundancy On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:46 AM, kltm notifications@github.com wrote:
|
copying comments from @ValWood: +1 This has lots of other advantages as well making the annotation easier for our users to consume, the bad IEA annotations are now easy to spot. http://www.slideshare.net/ValerieWood/pombase-internal-rules-for-curation-using-ontologies |
@cmungall Can we have the decision parameters to flag an annotation as redundant ? |
Redundant with geneontology/go-site#943 |
TBD:
do we want a globally redundant flag? Or make this relative to evidence code?
See also:
See also: http://jira.geneontology.org/browse/GO-144
Priority: post-Bar Harbor
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: