Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Promote DisableGardenerServiceAccountCreation featuregate to beta #711

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

AndreasBurger
Copy link
Member

How to categorize this PR?
/platform gcp

What this PR does / why we need it:
Promotes the DisableGardenerServiceAccountCreation feature gate from alpha to beta.

Release note:

`DisableGardenerServiceAccountCreation` feature gate has been promoted to beta and therefore is enabled by default.

@AndreasBurger AndreasBurger requested review from a team as code owners March 11, 2024 09:08
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review platform/gcp Google cloud platform/infrastructure size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Mar 11, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Mar 11, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Mar 11, 2024
promote DisableGardenerServiceAccountCreation featuregate from
alpha to beta
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Mar 11, 2024
kon-angelo
kon-angelo previously approved these changes Mar 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Mar 11, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Mar 11, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review and removed needs/review Needs review labels Mar 11, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Mar 11, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Mar 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kon-angelo kon-angelo merged commit 702086e into gardener:master Mar 12, 2024
9 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) platform/gcp Google cloud platform/infrastructure reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants