Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(jib-container): add maven daemon support as project type #3361

Conversation

ishantagarwal-x213235
Copy link
Contributor

@ishantagarwal-x213235 ishantagarwal-x213235 commented Nov 21, 2022

What this PR does / why we need it:
Added one more build option in type:jib-container to use Mavend for faster build processes of maven projects.

User can now use mavend to specify in projectType for jib-container modules.

Eg.

kind: Module
type: jib-container
name: spring-boot
build:
  projectType: mavend

This is useful for maven based projects and aims at providing faster Maven builds, when using jib container module.

@vvagaytsev
Copy link
Collaborator

Huge thanks for implementing this @ishantagarwal-x213235! 👍

Copy link
Collaborator

@vvagaytsev vvagaytsev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job, thank you so much! 🚀
I left a comment about sha256 hashes, please check.

Copy link
Collaborator

@vvagaytsev vvagaytsev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating this @ishantagarwal-x213235!
I've left a few more comments and suggestions. Please take a look.

@vvagaytsev vvagaytsev self-requested a review November 23, 2022 08:19
@vvagaytsev vvagaytsev merged commit bcbc7e3 into garden-io:main Nov 23, 2022
@vvagaytsev
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good! 🚀 Great job, @ishantagarwal-x213235! Thanks for your contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants