-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add group constructors PGO
and PSO
#4334
Conversation
and changed `POmega` to use the same mechanism
The failing tests look as if they may need PR #4333? (Not a problem, of course, we'll probably merge that soon, then this PR here can be rebased) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems sensible.
## constructs a group isomorphic to the projective group | ||
## PGO( <A>e</A>, <A>d</A>, <A>q</A> ) | ||
## of GO( <A>e</A>, <A>d</A>, <A>q</A> ), | ||
## modulo the centre |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A nitpick (which really is about existing documentation, which you just covered, so I don't really expect it to be addressed here): Formally, the definition is not to take the quotient modulo the center, but rather modulo scalar matrices (achieved implicitly by using a projective action on the vector). The two are related by not completely trivial mathematics. I think for a user who is not yet very experienced, this can be confusing (source: myself, many years ago ;-) -- so maybe I am just projecting here (pun not intended) and nobody else ever got confused).
Anyway, I guess what I am saying is that it might be better if we described in a separate section / paragraph what we mean by projective group (modulo scalars, equiv: acting on lines) and that this means we take a central factor, and that for many important cases ("full" groups) this in fact means factoring out the whole center. And then we can just reference that.
Thoughts? If people are not adverse to this, I could give it a go some of these days (I'd probably for now just submit an issue to not forget it...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Such a section on projective actions would be useful. It could refer to the FinInG package. (I had expected that also the recog package contains something interesting in this respect, but I did not find this at first sight.) In the other direction, the functions NormedVectors
, OnLines
, ProjectiveActionOnFullSpace
, ProjectiveOrder
could refer to the new section.
PGO
and PSO
PGO
and PSO
... and changed
POmega
to use the same mechanism