Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved code for NormalSubgroups #376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2015
Merged

Improved code for NormalSubgroups #376

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2015

Conversation

hulpke
Copy link
Contributor

@hulpke hulpke commented Nov 26, 2015

Attempt of a Pull Request:
If there are many complements, take affine action on cohomology group to
determine which ones are invariant, rather than forming subgroups and
testing normality. This gives a substantial speedup.

If there are many complements, take affine action on cohomology group to
determine which ones are invariant, rather than forming subgroups and
testing normality.
@markuspf
Copy link
Member

Thanks @hulpke for setting up pull requests!

I can confirm that this patch passes the tests and fixes issue #369 (and I played a bit with finding normal subgroups in other groups).

I admit that I do not fully understand the mathematics behind this fix (yet), but I see that there are helpful comments there, so I will spend some more time on this.

I suggest to clean up commented out code from the patch though.

@hungaborhorvath
Copy link
Contributor

Nice improvement, thank you. Seems to be faster when it takes longer time to compute normal subgroups.

@olexandr-konovalov
Copy link
Member

Thanks @hulpke and also @markuspf and @hungaborhorvath for testing. Let's merge it then?

markuspf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2015
Improved code for NormalSubgroups
@markuspf markuspf merged commit 726ab6c into gap-system:master Nov 30, 2015
@hulpke hulpke deleted the ah branch December 2, 2015 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants