Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dust templates based on GNILC #68

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Dust templates based on GNILC #68

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

zonca
Copy link
Member

@zonca zonca commented Nov 14, 2020

Notebook to create dust templates based on GNILC.

The notebooks download the required input data so they can be directly executed, the notebook to process the templates required 10GB of RAM to execute (works fine on Jupyter@NERSC), the "compare" notebook about 4GB, they both need namaster.

I saved intermediate and final results, they are available at:

https://portal.nersc.gov/project/cmb/pysm-dev/dust-gnilc/template/ or at NERSC /global/project/projectdirs/cmb/www/pysm-dev/dust-gnilc/template

@brandonshensley @NicolettaK if you have fixes/suggestions, you can either leave comments or email me a modified version of the notebooks.

Next I'll work on spectral index and dust temperature. Afterwards we can fix a telecon to discuss them.

@zonca zonca self-assigned this Nov 14, 2020
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@zonca
Copy link
Member Author

zonca commented Nov 14, 2020

see #69 for dust spectral index and temperature

@zonca
Copy link
Member Author

zonca commented Nov 18, 2020

ok, I have created a single notebook that processes both I and QU just changing the value of the comp variable.
In temperature this algorithm doesn't work well.
I think the problem is that the GNILC template are not smoothed using a standard spherical harmonics approach and they retain extra power even after the supposed cutoff of the beam. So I think this needs a more sophisticated algorithm, also, instead of using the 80 arcminutes version, I think it would be nice to retain as much as possible the original map, and then only fill small scales after the resolution limit of the map.

The GNILC map also contains a map of the resolution in the FWHM column:

image

I think these notebooks are a good starting point and someone more expert in dust modelling could start from them and implement the full processing of the templates.

@zonca
Copy link
Member Author

zonca commented Jul 22, 2021

see #72

@zonca zonca closed this Jul 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant