Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updating synchrotron #132

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

updating synchrotron #132

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

giuspugl
Copy link
Contributor

@giuspugl giuspugl commented Nov 10, 2022

Updates on Synchrotron

This PR will homogeneize the synchrotron models to the latest updates implemented on dust :

  • input templates the same as before: HASLAM (rescaled to 23GHz and WMAP K-band, smoothed at 2deg)

  • two pivot scales ell1=36,ell2=400 for small scale injection

  • spectral indices for EE, BB coming from literature , Planck 2018 :
    i. alpha_TT=alpha_TE= -1
    ii. alpha_EE = -0.84
    iii. alpha_BB= -0.78
    Notice that for TT and TE the value is justified by what actually see in the spectra of input maps :
    image

  • small scales have with non-zero TE

  • Modulation of qu maps with a single map, p:
    i. to avoid modulation w/ negative values,
    ii. to preserve non-zero TE

  • we propose to modulate polarization small scales as it has been done in pysm2(https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.02841.pdf) , with a couple of differences:
    i. small scales are expected to be injected with non-gaussian content (thanks to the logpoltens formalism);
    ii. split the sky with high reso pixels (nside=8) ;
    iii. use amplitude of E-mode spectra to derive the modulation template

Validation

TT, TE, EE, BB Power Spectra at different GAL masks

image

E-to- B ratio at different GAL masks

image

EE BB spectra in small patches

image

Polarization Fraction pixel distribution

image

Notebook and final synchrotron maps

Notebook can be found here
Maps available at NERSC :/global/cscratch1/sd/giuspugl/cmbs4/pysm_validation/synchro_pysmmod.fits

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@zonca
Copy link
Member

zonca commented Nov 12, 2022

PR targeted the wrong notebook, see #134

@zonca zonca closed this Nov 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants