-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 299
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix error in node environment #2362
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes made to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
packages/loader/src/gltf/extensions/EXT_texture_webp.ts (1)
19-25
: Consider logging the error in the catch block.The
try-catch
block is a good addition for robustness. However, logging the error can help with debugging if the WebP support detection fails.try { const testCanvas = document.createElement("canvas"); testCanvas.width = testCanvas.height = 1; this._supportWebP = testCanvas.toDataURL("image/webp").indexOf("data:image/webp") == 0; } catch (e) { + console.error("Error detecting WebP support:", e); this._supportWebP = false; }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/core/src/SystemInfo.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/loader/src/gltf/extensions/EXT_texture_webp.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/loader/src/gltf/extensions/EXT_texture_webp.ts
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/core/src/SystemInfo.ts (3)
9-10
: LGTM!The
isBrowser
property is correctly added and initialized totrue
.The code changes are approved.
28-29
: LGTM!The conditional check for
navigator
correctly setsisBrowser
tofalse
ifnavigator
is undefined.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
15-54
: LGTM!The
_initialize
method is correctly implemented and the changes do not introduce any issues.The code changes are approved.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
Other information:
Summary by CodeRabbit