-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feat/Request]: isAnyCallLoading #155
Comments
I think I will call it withAllCallStatus or withStoreCallStatus , and that will add isAnyCallLoading areAllCallsLoaded and callErrors (array of errors) |
… on any call withAnyCallsStatus adds isAnyCallLoading that returns true if any of the calls in the store are loading and callsErrors that returns an array with the erros of any call if any Fix #155
… on any call withAnyCallsStatus adds isAnyCallLoading that returns true if any of the calls in the store are loading and callsErrors that returns an array with the erros of any call if any Fix #155
… on any call withAnyCallsStatus adds isAnyCallLoading that returns true if any of the calls in the store are loading and callsErrors that returns an array with the erros of any call if any Fix #155
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 19.0.0-beta.4 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
https://discord.com/channels/1241018601541079070/1241018601541079073/1332375510935928833
Implement the concept of
isAnyCallLoading
which will return if any of the methods inside one or morewithCalls()
is loading.Justification is that, at the moment, if you want to achieve this, then you have to create a computed which evaluates the
xIsLoading()
of eachwithCalls()
method. Not a terrible thing, but across several stores it can be messy and require maintenance when adding or removing methods fromwithCalls()
.Cheers!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: