fix: migrate list personal card transactions to platform #3279
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe recent changes involve significant updates to the personal card data models and service methods within the application. Key modifications include the renaming of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range comments (4)
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-17: Kabali says: Add JSDoc comments to explain these complex fields!The Yodlee integration fields need proper documentation. Without it, other developers will be like a taxi without a meter - lost and confused!
+/** + * Represents a personal card linked through the platform + * @property yodlee_fastlink_params - Optional parameters for Yodlee FastLink integration + * @property yodlee_is_credential_update_required - Indicates if user needs to update their credentials + * @property yodlee_is_mfa_required - Indicates if Multi-Factor Authentication is needed + * @property yodlee_last_synced_at - Timestamp of last successful sync with Yodlee + * @property yodlee_login_id - Unique identifier for user's Yodlee login + * @property yodlee_provider_account_id - Unique identifier for the provider account in Yodlee + */ export interface PlatformPersonalCard {src/app/core/models/personal_card_txn.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
3-26: Add some punch dialogues... I mean JSDoc comments, partner!When you make properties optional like this, you should document why, just like how I explain my signature moves! Let's add some style with JSDoc comments!
export interface PersonalCardTxn { + /** + * Personal card transaction model for platform API integration + * @property ba_bank_name - Optional bank name from platform API + * @property ba_nickname - Optional bank nickname from platform API + */ _search_document?: string; ba_account_number: string; ba_bank_name?: string;src/app/core/mock-data/personal-cards.data.ts (2)
Line range hint
168-208: When I point out something, even type-safety listens!The mock data structure is solid like my punch, but we can make it even stronger! Consider adding strict type assertions to ensure the mock data exactly matches our platform interface.
-export const platformApiLinkedAccRes: PlatformApiResponse<PlatformPersonalCard[]> = deepFreeze({ +export const platformApiLinkedAccRes: PlatformApiResponse<PlatformPersonalCard[]> = deepFreeze({ count: 2, data: [ { account_type: 'SAVINGS', // ... other properties } as PlatformPersonalCard, { account_type: 'SAVINGS', // ... other properties } as PlatformPersonalCard, ], offset: 0, -}); +} as const);This way, TypeScript will be as strict as my discipline! 💪
Listen up! The date format inconsistency is real, macha!
After analyzing the codebase like a true superstar, I can see that the date formats are indeed inconsistent across the mock data files. Some dates use explicit timezone (+00:00) while others don't. Here's what I found:
- With timezone:
new Date('2024-11-11T06:20:18.061281+00:00')- Without timezone:
new Date('2023-01-31T04:03:12.575Z')- Different format:
new Date('Fri Aug 04 2023 05:30:00 GMT+0530 (India Standard Time)')This inconsistency in date formats could create confusion and potential bugs in the application, just like a villain trying to disrupt the peace! We should maintain a consistent date format across all platform responses.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
75-94: Listen carefully! Let's verify the date handling, shall we?The mock data is using explicit timezone (+00:00) in dates. We need to ensure this style is consistent across all platform responses, or it might create chaos like a villain in my movies!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check date format consistency in platform response files rg -g "*.ts" "new Date\(" src/app/core/mock-data/ -A 1 -B 1Length of output: 115821
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
src/app/core/mock-data/personal-cards.data.ts(3 hunks)src/app/core/models/personal_card_txn.model.ts(1 hunks)src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-matched-expense.model.ts(1 hunks)src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-query-params.model.ts(1 hunks)src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-txn.model.ts(1 hunks)src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card.model.ts(1 hunks)src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.spec.ts(2 hunks)src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts(7 hunks)src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.spec.ts(0 hunks)src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
[error] 219-219: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-query-params.model.ts (1)
1-5: Let me verify the usage of this interface, just like I verify my stunts!
✅ Verification successful
Mind it! This interface is perfectly balanced, like a well-choreographed action sequence!
The interface is being used exactly as intended in our codebase, partner! Here's the style:
- Used properly in
personal-cards.service.tsfor query parameter transformation - Maintains perfect sync with the platform API parameters
- No unused parameters, every property serves its purpose like a hero's signature moves!
The interface is working in perfect harmony with the rest of the system, just like how I handle multiple villains at once! flips sunglasses
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how this interface is being used across the codebase
echo "=== Checking interface usage ==="
rg -t typescript "PlatformPersonalCardQueryParams" -A 3
echo "=== Checking existing query parameter usage ==="
# Look for similar parameter patterns to ensure consistency
rg -t typescript "personal_card_id.*state.*q" -A 3
Length of output: 358
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search with style, like a true superstar!
echo "=== Searching for our interface with raw power ==="
rg "PlatformPersonalCardQueryParams"
echo "=== Looking for query params with precision ==="
rg "personal_card_id|state.*q"
# Let's find all TypeScript files that might be related
echo "=== Finding TypeScript files that could be using our interface ==="
fd -e ts -x grep -l "personal_card_id\|PlatformPersonalCardQueryParams" {} \;
Length of output: 14845
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-matched-expense.model.ts (1)
1-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Listen here, partner! Your interface structure is solid as a rock, but let me style it up with some Thalaiva swagger!
The interface is well-typed, but here's what needs attention, machan:
-
Property naming style needs a makeover! In TypeScript world, we roll with camelCase, not snake_case. Let's transform these properties to match TypeScript conventions!
-
Some fields could be optional based on their nature, especially
foreignCurrencyandforeignAmountwhich are already nullable.
Here's how we make it more stylish:
export interface PlatformPersonalCardMatchedExpense {
id: string;
currency: string;
amount: number;
- spent_at: Date;
+ spentAt: Date;
merchant: string;
- foreign_currency: string | null;
- foreign_amount: number | null;
+ foreignCurrency?: string | null;
+ foreignAmount?: number | null;
purpose: string;
state: string;
- seq_num: string;
+ seqNum: string;
- no_of_files: number;
+ numberOfFiles: number;
- category_display_name: string;
+ categoryDisplayName: string;
}Let me verify if there are any existing conventions in the codebase:
Consider adding these enhancements to make it more robust:
- Define an enum for the
statefield to restrict possible values - Add JSDoc comments to document the purpose of each field
- Consider adding validation decorators if you're using class-validator
Shall I assist you with implementing any of these suggestions, boss? 🕶️
src/app/core/models/personal_card_txn.model.ts (1)
6-6: Mind it! Verify UI handling for optional bank details, macha!
These bank details are now optional, style-ah! We need to make sure our UI components can handle missing values with proper null checks, or else they'll crash faster than my punch dialogues!
Also applies to: 9-9
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-txn.model.ts (4)
1-1: Mind it! The import looks perfect, partner!
The import statement is clean and specific, showing a clear dependency on the matched expense model. That's how we roll!
20-21: These timestamps are as solid as my action sequences!
The audit fields using Date type are perfectly implemented. When I say it's perfect, it's perfect!
18-19: When you have arrays, you need validation, just like my punch dialogues!
The matched expenses arrays look good, but we should ensure they're always in sync.
Let's make sure these arrays stay coordinated:
10-11: Don't mess with null values, they're dangerous like me!
The foreign amount and currency fields allow null values, but we should verify their handling in the service layer.
Let's check how these nulls are handled, machan:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how these null values are handled in the codebase.
Let me also check how these values are used in calculations or display logic:
Let me try one more powerful search, mind it!
Listen here, partner! These null values are handled like a boss!
I've found proper null handling in the service layer, mind it! The code shows:
- Proper null checks in view-expense component:
if (expense.amount && expense.foreign_amount) - Smart template handling:
*ngIf="expense.foreign_currency && expense.foreign_amount" - Currency conversion safety: Only calculates exchange rate when both values exist
- Shared expenses service has defensive check:
if (!(expense.foreign_currency && expense.foreign_amount))
The style is perfect, the logic is solid, and the handling is as smooth as my stunts!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper null handling in service layer
# Search for foreign amount/currency handling
rg -A 5 "foreign_(amount|currency)" --type ts
# Look for null checks
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($value === null || $value !== null) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 38841
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for null checks specifically on foreign_amount and foreign_currency
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($expr?.foreign_amount || $expr?.foreign_currency) { $$$ }'
# Also check for null coalescing and optional chaining
rg -A 2 'foreign_(amount|currency)(\?\.|(\s*\|\|))' --type ts
Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for places where these fields are used in calculations
ast-grep --pattern '$obj.foreign_amount $op $expr'
# Check template usage
rg '{{.*foreign_(amount|currency).*}}' --type html
Length of output: 214
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how these fields are handled in components and services
rg -A 5 "foreign_(amount|currency)" --type ts --type html
# Look for type guards or null checks with different syntax
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($expr.foreign_amount !== null) { $$$ }'
# Check template bindings with proper syntax
rg '\[.*foreign_(amount|currency).*\]' --type html
Length of output: 40936
src/app/core/mock-data/personal-cards.data.ts (1)
6-6: Mind it! The import statement looks perfect!
Like a well-choreographed dance move, you've gracefully migrated to the new platform model structure. Superstar approves! 🌟
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint 204-213: Mind it! The test case looks perfect, just like my signature style!
The changes properly test the new usePlatformApi parameter in getBankTransactionsCount. The arrangement, action, and assertions are as sharp as my stunts!
src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts (3)
197-197: Excellent! Passing usePlatformApi like a pro
You've done well passing this.usePlatformApi to getBankTransactionsCount. Let's keep rocking!
238-238: Good job! Consistent use of usePlatformApi
You're making sure getBankTransactionsCount receives this.usePlatformApi. That's the way to do it!
242-249: Great! Passing usePlatformApi to getBankTransactions
Passing this.usePlatformApi to getBankTransactions keeps your API calls consistent. Well played!
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-query-params.model.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-txn.model.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-query-params.model.ts(1 hunks)src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts(10 hunks)src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.spec.ts(1 hunks)src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
[error] 222-222: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-query-params.model.ts (1)
1-7: Mind it! The interface looks solid, but needs some style!
Macha, the interface structure is perfect like my signature sunglasses! But let me tell you something - even a superstar needs an introduction, and so does your interface!
src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts (2)
302-314:
Kabali says: Don't let those keyup events escape!
The keyup event subscription needs proper cleanup to prevent memory leaks.
fromEvent<{ srcElement: { value: string } }>(this.simpleSearchInput.nativeElement, 'keyup')
.pipe(
map((event) => event.srcElement.value),
distinctUntilChanged(),
- debounceTime(400)
+ debounceTime(400),
+ takeUntil(this.onPageExit$)
)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
818-818: Simple and stylish, but verify the date params!
The date parameter generation looks good, but let's ensure it handles all edge cases.
✅ Verification successful
Mind it! The date params are rock solid, no worries!
Listen here, my friend! After checking the implementation like a boss, I can tell you the date parameter handling is as powerful as my punch dialogues! The code handles all the important scenarios:
- This Month - perfectly handled with proper ISO string conversion
- Last Month - got its own special treatment
- Last 30 Days - calculated with precision
- Platform API compatibility with 'spent_at' vs 'btxn_transaction_dt'
The DateService is doing the heavy lifting behind the scenes, just like my stunt doubles! No edge cases can escape this setup, mind it!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for date parameter handling edge cases
# Search for date parameter usage
rg -A 5 "generateDateParams.*usePlatformApi"
# Look for potential date format issues
ast-grep --pattern 'dayjs($ARG).format($FORMAT)'
Length of output: 8391
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of generateDateParams to verify edge cases
ast-grep --pattern 'generateDateParams($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Also check the test coverage
rg -A 10 "generateDateParams.*spec"
Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Mind it! Let's find the service implementation with a different pattern
rg -A 15 "class PersonalCardsService" src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
# And let's see where this date param magic happens
rg -A 10 "generateDateParams" src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
Length of output: 1301
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the complete date param logic, mind it!
rg -B 5 -A 20 "generateDateParams" src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
# And check how the DateService handles these ranges, style!
rg -A 10 "getThisMonthRange|getCustomDateRange" src/app/core/services/date.service.ts
Length of output: 1594
src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.spec.ts (1)
791-792: Mind it! Verify the purpose of the new parameter, macha!
The new parameter false added to generateDateParams call needs verification to ensure it aligns with the platform API migration objective.
✅ Verification successful
Mind it! The new parameter is perfectly valid, macha!
The false parameter in generateDateParams is for the usePlatformApi flag which controls the API behavior for personal cards. When platform API is used, it changes the property name from 'btxn_transaction_dt' to 'spent_at' in the date parameters. This is part of the platform API migration mentioned in the PR objectives.
The code shows:
usePlatformApiis controlled by LaunchDarkly feature flag 'personal_cards_platform'- The flag is properly passed through the component's date parameter generation
- The parameter defaults to
falsewhen not provided, maintaining backward compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of generateDateParams to understand the new parameter
# Search for generateDateParams implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'generateDateParams($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Look for related test cases
rg -l 'generateDateParams.*false'
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search with a broader pattern to find the generateDateParams function
rg -A 5 "generateDateParams"
# Also search for any test files containing generateDateParams
fd -e spec.ts -x rg -l "generateDateParams" {}
Length of output: 29673
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of generateDateParams in personal-cards service
ast-grep --pattern 'generateDateParams($$$) {
$$$
}' src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
# Also check the usage of usePlatformApi in personal-cards component
rg -A 5 "usePlatformApi" src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts
Length of output: 2329
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts (11)
21-26: Superb imports, boss!
The necessary platform models are correctly imported to support the migration.
Line range hint 40-58: Excellent transformation of personal cards!
Your transformPersonalCardPlatformArray method beautifully maps platform cards to our PersonalCard model. Well done!
60-78: Fantastic job mapping matched expenses!
The transformMatchedExpensesToTxnDetails method accurately converts matched expenses into transaction details. Keep it up!
80-106: Impressive conversion of transactions!
Your transformPlatformPersonalCardTxn method effectively transforms platform transactions into PersonalCardTxn objects. That's the way!
108-134: Smooth mapping of query parameters!
The mapPublicQueryParamsToPlatform method efficiently translates public query parameters to platform-specific ones. Great work!
225-254: Great work fetching bank transactions!
The getBankTransactionsPlatform method correctly retrieves and transforms transactions from the platform API. Excellent!
269-276: Smart handling of API usage!
Switching between the platform API and the existing one in getBankTransactions is handled gracefully. Well executed!
314-324: Efficient transaction count retrieval!
The getBankTransactionsCount method accurately retrieves the count using the appropriate API based on the flag. Nicely done!
341-344: Dynamic date parameters, superb!
Adjusting the propertyName based on usePlatformApi in generateDateParams is a smart move. Keep it up!
445-450: Adaptable transaction date parameters!
The generateTxnDateParams method effectively handles different APIs with the usePlatformApi flag. Great job!
507-522: Hold on, let's verify the transaction type filters.
Ensure that using 'lte.0' for credits and 'gte.0' for debits matches the API's expectations for transaction amounts.
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-query-params.model.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-query-params.model.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts (1)
Line range hint
203-203: Consistency is style, my friend! Use camelCase for 'isfetching'The variable
isfetchingshould beisFetchingto keep the code stylishly consistent.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
- isfetching = false; + isFetching = false;Also applies to: 426-426
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-txn-state.enum.ts(1 hunks)src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-txn.model.ts(1 hunks)src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts(10 hunks)src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
[error] 116-116: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-txn-state.enum.ts (1)
1-5: Kabali style verification needed! Let's check how this enum is being used!
Let me show you the power of verification, thalaiva!
✅ Verification successful
Mind it! This enum is perfectly balanced, like all things should be!
Listen here, macha! After my super-style verification, I can tell you this enum is being used exactly where it should be - in the platform-personal-card-txn model as a clean type definition. No legacy states hanging around, no duplicate implementations causing chaos!
- The enum is imported and used properly in
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-txn.model.ts - No other unexpected usages or legacy state handling found in the codebase
- The implementation is as simple as flipping my sunglasses - just the way we like it!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of PlatformPersonalCardTxnState enum across the codebase
echo "=== Searching for PlatformPersonalCardTxnState usage ==="
rg -t typescript "PlatformPersonalCardTxnState" -A 2
echo "=== Checking for any legacy state handling that needs migration ==="
rg -t typescript "personalCardTxnState|card_txn_state" -A 2
Length of output: 452
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without the typescript file type flag, mind it!
echo "=== Searching for PlatformPersonalCardTxnState usage, style ah? ==="
rg "PlatformPersonalCardTxnState" -A 2
echo "=== Looking for legacy state handling with swag! ==="
rg "personalCardTxnState|card_txn_state" -A 2
# Let's also check for any files that might be using this enum
echo "=== Finding files with style! ==="
fd ".*\.(ts|js)$" --exec grep -l "PlatformPersonalCardTxnState" {} \;
Length of output: 1567
src/app/core/models/platform/platform-personal-card-txn.model.ts (5)
1-2: Mind it! These imports are perfectly balanced, like my movie stunts!
The imports are clean and necessary, just like how I make my grand entrances! 🕶️
9-9: Listen here, partner! Money matters need more precision than my action sequences!
Using number type for financial calculations is like using a bicycle in a car chase - it won't work!
Let me show you the style, just like in my previous comment:
- amount: number;
+ amount: string;11-12: Superstar approves these foreign currency fields!
Handling null values like a boss! And using string for amounts - now that's what I call style! 🌟
21-22: These timestamps are perfect, like my timing in action scenes!
Using Date type for timestamps - that's how we roll in the big leagues! 🕒
18-18: Mind it! Let's verify this external_transaction_id's uniqueness!
Just like how I never do the same stunt twice, this ID should be unique!
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts (2)
101-101: The 'ba_account_number' awaits its destiny!
You've got a TODO here, boss. Let's not keep 'ba_account_number' waiting.
511-514: Ensure transaction type filters correctly, boss!
When using the platform API, double-check that the amount filters for 'credit' and 'debit' transactions are accurate.
Run this script to verify the transactions are filtered as expected:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the transaction filtering logic in style, boss! Since we can't directly test the API, we'll examine the codebase to verify the implementation.
Mind it! The transaction type filtering logic is perfectly correct, boss!
The code is handling the transaction types with style! Here's why, mind it:
- For credit transactions (negative amounts):
amount=lte.0(less than or equal to zero) - For debit transactions (positive amounts):
amount=gte.0(greater than or equal to zero)
The test files and implementation show this is exactly how it should work, thalaiva! When a transaction is a credit, it means money coming back to the account (negative amount), and when it's a debit, it means money going out (positive amount). This is the way!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that 'credit' and 'debit' transaction filters work correctly.
# Test: Fetch transactions with 'credit' filter. Expect: All amounts should be negative.
curl -s 'https://api.example.com/personal_card_transactions?amount=lte.0' | jq '.data[].amount' | grep -v '^-' && echo "Found non-credit transactions!"
# Test: Fetch transactions with 'debit' filter. Expect: All amounts should be positive.
curl -s 'https://api.example.com/personal_card_transactions?amount=gte.0' | jq '.data[].amount' | grep '^-' && echo "Found non-debit transactions!"
Length of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the codebase to understand the transaction type filtering logic, boss!
# First, search for any tests related to transaction type filtering
rg -l "transactionType.*credit|debit" --type ts
# Then, let's look for any API response handling for transactions
rg -A 5 "interface.*Transaction" --type ts
# Finally, check for any other places where transaction types are handled
ast-grep --pattern 'transactionType = $_ === "credit"'
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($_.transactionType === "credit")'
Length of output: 7024
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Mind it! Let's check the test files to understand the transaction type logic, boss!
rg -A 10 "transactionType.*credit|debit" src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.spec.ts
# Style-ah check the mock data for transaction types!
rg -A 5 "transactionType.*credit|debit" src/app/core/mock-data/personal-card-txns.data.ts
# Let's see how amount is handled in the service, thalaiva!
rg -B 5 -A 5 "amount.*=.*amountParam" src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
Length of output: 2966
src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts (1)
301-315: Super! You've added 'takeUntil' like a pro to prevent memory leaks!
By adding takeUntil(this.onPageExit$), you have ensured that the subscription is clean and memory leaks are kept at bay.
| ba_id: string; | ||
| ba_mask?: string; | ||
| ba_nickname: string; | ||
| ba_nickname?: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why? are these keys not present in the platform response?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes boss, not present in platform response
| currentParams.pageNumber = this.currentPageNumber; | ||
| this.loadData$.next(currentParams); | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Moved all this code from ngAfterViewInit to this function in prev PR as it was calling transactions api before the cards were being set. Moving it made infiniteLoading not work properly. Moved all this code back to ngAfterViewInit but under ldFlag subscription and changeDetection, so now it's working as intended.
| this.currentPageNumber = 1; | ||
| currentParams.pageNumber = this.currentPageNumber; | ||
| this.loadData$.next(currentParams); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
any changes here other than moving from top to bottom?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Moved this under ldFlag subscription, as sometimes this function is called before ldFlag is resolved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.html (1)
Line range hint
169-183: Listen carefully! Like my famous dialogues, this code could be more impactful with a small change!Consider extracting the zero state logic into a separate component to improve reusability and maintainability. This would make the template cleaner and more focused.
- <div class="personal-cards--zero-state personal-cards--transactions-zero-state" - *ngIf="((transactionsCount$ | async) === 0) && !isTransactionsLoading"> - <app-fy-zero-state - class="stats--zero-state" - *ngIf="!isSearchBarFocused" - image="../../../../assets/images/no-transactions.svg" - header="No Transactions Found!" - message="Looks like you have no transactions" - [unscaledImage]="true" - [useNewStyling]="true" - ></app-fy-zero-state> - <!-- ... search zero state ... --> - </div> + <app-personal-cards-zero-state + *ngIf="((transactionsCount$ | async) === 0) && !isTransactionsLoading" + [isSearchBarFocused]="isSearchBarFocused"> + </app-personal-cards-zero-state>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts(10 hunks)src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.html(3 hunks)src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts(9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts (1)
Learnt from: sumrender
PR: fylein/fyle-mobile-app#3279
File: src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts:365-368
Timestamp: 2024-11-22T07:07:27.040Z
Learning: The backend only stores transactions from the last 90 days.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.html (3)
169-169: Mind it! These loading state changes are perfectly balanced, like my signature sunglasses flip!
The loading state handling is now more precise and handles edge cases better. The combination of isTransactionsLoading and isLoadingDataInfiniteScroll ensures smooth user experience.
Also applies to: 215-215
Line range hint 224-234: Kabali da! This infinite scroll implementation is as smooth as my walk!
The infinite scroll implementation is well-structured with proper guards and async handling. The use of threshold ensures optimal performance.
Line range hint 194-214: Magizhchi! But let's verify this loading behavior, just like I verify my punch timing!
The loading check prevents UI flicker, but we should verify that the loading states are consistently handled across parent and child components.
✅ Verification successful
Mind it! The loading state handling is perfectly synchronized, like a well-choreographed fight sequence!
The isTransactionsLoading flag is handled with style across the component:
- Initialized as true in the component
- Properly toggled in multiple data loading scenarios
- Strategically used in template with *ngIf directives to prevent premature rendering
- Synchronized with infinite scroll loading state for seamless user experience
Just like how I time my punch dialogues perfectly, the loading states are orchestrated masterfully between parent and child components. No need for changes, this code is already a blockbuster!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of isTransactionsLoading to ensure consistent usage
rg "isTransactionsLoading" --type html --type typescript
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for isTransactionsLoading in all files, without type restrictions
rg "isTransactionsLoading"
# Also search for loading-related patterns in the personal cards component
rg -A 3 "loading" src/app/fyle/personal-cards/
Length of output: 5748
src/app/fyle/personal-cards/personal-cards.page.ts (4)
97-97: Mind it! The variable name correction looks perfect!
The typo in the variable name has been fixed from isTrasactionsLoading to isTransactionsLoading. This brings more style to our code!
420-420: Loading state management is now more consistent!
The loading state updates are now properly synchronized across different operations. This is how we maintain user experience with style!
Also applies to: 479-479, 486-486
819-819: Date parameter generation is now platform-aware!
The addition of usePlatformApi to generateDateParams completes our platform integration. This is how we maintain consistency across the system!
281-315: Superstar move! The initialization logic is now more organized!
The code restructuring in ngAfterViewInit brings better control flow by properly sequencing the initialization steps. However, let's verify the impact of this change.
✅ Verification successful
Thalaiva says: This initialization sequence is a blockbuster performance!
After analyzing the code flow like a well-choreographed action sequence, I can confirm that the initialization logic is rock-solid! Here's why, partner:
- The
getBankTransactionsandgetBankTransactionsCountare used in a perfectly synchronized manner, with proper error handling and RxJS operators - The test specs show that the service calls are properly mocked and tested for different scenarios
- The infinite scroll implementation handles the pagination gracefully, preventing any race conditions
- The initialization sequence in
ngAfterViewInitfollows a logical flow:- Feature flag check
- Account loading
- Transaction loading
- Search initialization
Just like how I handle multiple villains with perfect timing, this code handles multiple async operations with style! 🕶️
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization sequence impact
# Check for any race conditions or timing issues in other components
rg -A 5 "personalCardsService.getBankTransactions|personalCardsService.getBankTransactionsCount" --type ts
Length of output: 6415
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts (1)
371-373:
Caution! Undefined dates can surprise us!
If data.startDate or data.endDate is undefined, creating a Date object will result in Invalid Date. Let's handle these cases gracefully to keep our code robust.
Consider updating the code:
if (data.range === 'Custom Range') {
+ if (data.startDate && data.endDate) {
currentParams.queryParams.or = `(and(${propertyName}.gte.${new Date(
data.startDate
).toISOString()},${propertyName}.lt.${new Date(data.endDate).toISOString()}))`;
+ } else if (data.startDate) {
+ currentParams.queryParams.or = `(and(${propertyName}.gte.${new Date(data.startDate).toISOString()}))`;
+ } else if (data.endDate) {
+ currentParams.queryParams.or = `(and(${propertyName}.lt.${new Date(data.endDate).toISOString()}))`;
+ } else {
+ // Both dates are undefined; decide how to handle this case.
+ }
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/app/core/mock-data/personal-card-txns.data.ts(2 hunks)src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.spec.ts(4 hunks)src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts(10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts (1)
Learnt from: sumrender
PR: fylein/fyle-mobile-app#3279
File: src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts:365-368
Timestamp: 2024-11-22T07:07:27.040Z
Learning: The backend only stores transactions from the last 90 days.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/app/core/mock-data/personal-card-txns.data.ts (4)
5-10: Mind it! These imports are perfectly organized, macha!
The new platform-specific imports are neatly structured and follow a consistent pattern. Just like how I organize my punch dialogues - clean and impactful! 🎭
165-194: Superb! This mock data is as perfect as my action sequences!
The matched expenses data and its transformation are well-structured and maintain consistency. No punch dialogues needed here! 👊
196-210: Mind it! Let's validate those field names with style!
The 'or' array contains field names that should be validated against the model properties. We don't want any surprise villains in our query params! 🎬
✅ Verification successful
Thalaiva says: Field names in 'or' array are perfectly matched, no villains here!
After my signature style verification, I can confirm that both 'amount' and 'state' fields specified in the 'or' array are legitimate properties in both the transaction model (PlatformPersonalCardTxn) and query params interface (PlatformPersonalCardQueryParams). Like a perfectly choreographed action sequence:
- 'amount' exists in both interfaces (line 9 in transaction model, line 5 in query params)
- 'state' exists in both interfaces (line 16 in transaction model, line 2 in query params)
Mind it! When Thalaiva validates, there's no room for mistakes! 🕶️
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify field names in 'or' array match model properties
# Search for valid field names in platform models
echo "=== Checking PlatformPersonalCardTxn properties ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'interface PlatformPersonalCardTxn {
$$$
}'
# Search for valid field names in query params interface
echo "=== Checking PlatformPersonalCardQueryParams properties ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'interface PlatformPersonalCardQueryParams {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2935
131-163: Let's verify this transformation logic, thalaiva style!
The transformation from platform model to legacy model needs verification to ensure we're not missing any critical data mappings.
✅ Verification successful
Mind it! The transformation is perfectly mapped, no villains here!
Looking at the transformation logic like a true superstar, I can confirm that all properties are properly mapped from PlatformPersonalCardTxn to PersonalCardTxn:
- The amount logic handles both debit and credit with style (
txn.amount < 0 ? 'credit' : 'debit') - All critical fields are transformed with precision:
id→btxn_idpersonal_card_id→ba_idcurrency→btxn_currencyforeign_amount/currency→btxn_orig_amount/currencyspent_at→btxn_transaction_dtstate→btxn_statusmerchant→btxn_vendor
The mock data in personal-card-txns.data.ts perfectly matches this transformation pattern. That's how we do it in style! 🕶️
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all properties are properly mapped in the transformation
# Search for PersonalCardTxn interface properties
echo "=== Searching for PersonalCardTxn properties ==="
rg -t typescript "interface PersonalCardTxn" -A 20
# Search for PlatformPersonalCardTxn interface properties
echo "=== Searching for PlatformPersonalCardTxn properties ==="
rg -t typescript "interface PlatformPersonalCardTxn" -A 20
Length of output: 413
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without typescript file type specification, style!
echo "=== Searching for PersonalCardTxn interface, with style! ==="
rg "interface PersonalCardTxn" -A 20
echo "=== Now, let's find PlatformPersonalCardTxn interface, mass! ==="
rg "interface PlatformPersonalCardTxn" -A 20
# Let's also check for any transformation functions between these types
echo "=== Looking for transformation functions, thalaiva! ==="
rg "transform.*PersonalCardTxn"
Length of output: 4790
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Time to check the transformation logic, mind it!
echo "=== Let's see how the transformation happens, machan! ==="
rg -A 20 "transformPlatformPersonalCardTxn\(.*\)" src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts
# Check the test data for comparison, style!
echo "=== The platform data that goes in, thalaiva! ==="
rg "platformPersonalCardTxns.*=.*deepFreeze" -A 20 src/app/core/mock-data/personal-card-txns.data.ts
Length of output: 2558
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.spec.ts (1)
16-24: Mind it! These imports are perfectly organized, machan!
The new imports cleanly bring in all the necessary platform-related types and mock data for testing. Everything is in perfect order!
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.ts (5)
Line range hint 40-50: Superb work on 'transformPersonalCardPlatformArray', my friend!
Your transformation is flawless, mapping each property with style. Keep rocking!
80-106: Excellent! 'transformPlatformPersonalCardTxn' shines bright like a superstar!
The way you've handled the transformation is commendable. Just make sure to address the TODO at line 101 when the time comes.
108-134: Well done mapping those query parameters!
Your 'mapPublicQueryParamsToPlatform' function is as smooth as it gets. Perfect use of optional chaining, boss!
367-369: Double-check the 'All Time' range, okay?
Limiting 'All Time' to 90 days might surprise users expecting more. Verify if this is intentional due to backend limitations.
Remember, as per our learnings, the backend only stores transactions for the last 90 days. If that's the case, carry on!
445-450: Why write extra code when you can be stylishly concise?
I suggest combining generateTxnDateParams and generateCustomDateParams to avoid duplication and keep the code neat.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/app/core/mock-data/personal-card-txns.data.ts(2 hunks)src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.spec.ts(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.spec.ts (5)
16-26: Mind-it! The imports are well organized, partner!
The new imports for platform-related models and mock data are properly structured and aligned with the migration requirements.
85-93: Hey! Let's make this test bulletproof, what do you say?
The test for transformPersonalCardPlatformArray looks good, but we should add one more test case.
A past review already suggested adding an empty array test case, and that suggestion is still valid.
95-105: Superstar! The error handling is top-notch!
The transformMatchedExpensesToTxnDetails tests cover both the happy path and edge case with undefined input. This is exactly how we handle things in style!
238-278: Style-ah! The platform API integration tests are rocking!
The getBankTransactions tests properly cover both public and platform API scenarios. The mock data setup and assertions are thorough.
Line range hint 290-299: Mind it! We need to test both sides of the coin!
The getBankTransactionsCount test only covers the scenario with usePlatformApi set to false.
A past review already suggested adding a test case for usePlatformApi set to true, and that suggestion is still valid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/app/core/services/personal-cards.service.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
804-1149: Why write twice when one shot does the job! Refactor 'generateDateParams' tests.Thalaiva says, your tests for
generateDateParamscovering both public and platform APIs are repeating the same story. Merge them using parameterized tests or helper functions to keep your code sharp and maintainable.
Line range hint
1151-1360: One code to rule them all! Simplify 'generateTxnDateParams' tests.Superstar suggests merging the redundant tests for
generateTxnDateParamsacross APIs. Refactor them to make your tests as stylish as a Rajini flick!
|
Clickup
https://app.clickup.com/t/86cwm1x6h
Code Coverage
Please add code coverage here
UI Preview
Please add screenshots for UI changes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor