Add 2 new rules NestedFunctionNames and UnnestedFunctionNames

[webwarrior-ws]

These rules allow configuring naming conventions for nested and unnested function names.

[knocte]

LGTM, let's squash all commits into 1? (Use Co-authored-by: Name Surname <email@address.com> tag in commit message.)

[knocte]

From 064444fec757bf273cf6e0d856838dea3179a214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: webwarrior <reg@webwarrior.ws>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 06:48:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add 2 new rules NestedFunctionNames and UnnestedFunctionNames

These rules allow configuring naming conventions for nested and unnested function names.

Co-authored-by: Retheesh Erathu <sumod8898@gmail.com>

It should be the other way around: Retheesh be the author of the commit (as the majority of the code is his), but add yourself in the Co-authored-by tag.

[knocte]

Why do I see 6 commits now in this PR instead of 1 or 2? Commit 31a1fba looks correct and you should've used --amend to that one.

[webwarrior-ws]

Why do I see 6 commits now in this PR instead of 1 or 2? Commit 31a1fba looks correct and you should've used --amend to that one.

For some reason my local function-names branch was unsynchronized with remote one. So I pulled and pushed.

[knocte]

And when pulling I guess you didn't use the flag --rebase.

[webwarrior-ws]

No

[knocte]

That's the reason then. Please always use --rebase when pulling, otherwise it causes this kind of weird merges/messes.

[knocte]

@webwarrior-ws can you rebase this please (also pls update the "Introduced in" text in docs).

[knocte]

@webwarrior-ws can you rebase this please (also pls update the "Introduced in" text in docs).

ping

[webwarrior-ws]

@knocte
Rebased on top of latest master branch.