Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BACnet reads duplicated values #426

Closed
bencahill opened this issue Jul 20, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

BACnet reads duplicated values #426

bencahill opened this issue Jul 20, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
fixed need investigation need investigation

Comments

@bencahill
Copy link

bencahill commented Jul 20, 2022

Hi,

This is really great software you have made. Thank you for all the time and effort you have put into it.

I had good success with reading Modbus values, but I am running into a problem with BACnet. When I add BACnet points, they all read as the same value as the first point added. See the attached screencast.

I'm running the Docker Hub version 1.1.6, on Ubuntu Linux.

Any ideas how to fix this?

Thanks.

@unocelli unocelli added the need investigation need investigation label Jul 29, 2022
@unocelli
Copy link
Member

Hi,
does the problem always occur with any type of tags?

@bencahill
Copy link
Author

Yes, I just tested again with two binary inputs (BI) and two analog outputs (AO) and the same problem occurred as described above and illustrated in the screencast.

I also reproduced the problem with the YABE room simulator as mentioned in another issue ( #114 (comment) ).

You can reproduce with a Windows box with YABE installed by running "C:\Program Files\Yabe\AddOn\Bacnet.Room.Simulator.exe". Look at points Temperature.Outdoor and Temperature.Indoor. They should be different.

unocelli added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2023
@unocelli unocelli added the fixed label Jan 3, 2023
@bencahill
Copy link
Author

Thanks. This is working now when I test it against the YABE simulator. Unfortunately I cannot get BACnet to work with any other device I have. Will add a note to #652.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fixed need investigation need investigation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants