Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Reduce uninitialized memory trickery in RWLock C interface test #213

Closed
jethrogb opened this issue Feb 10, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by rust-lang/rust#76278
Closed

Reduce uninitialized memory trickery in RWLock C interface test #213

jethrogb opened this issue Feb 10, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by rust-lang/rust#76278
Labels
enhancement std/rustc Requires changes in Rust std/rustc

Comments

@jethrogb
Copy link
Member

jethrogb commented Feb 10, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Once rust-lang/rust#68491 is merged, implement eddyb's suggestion to use a static in pnkfelix/rust#1 (comment). In the PR, ask eddyb for review.
@jethrogb jethrogb added enhancement std/rustc Requires changes in Rust std/rustc labels Feb 10, 2020
@jethrogb jethrogb mentioned this issue Sep 3, 2020
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2020
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#76278 - jethrogb:jb/sgx-rwlock-init-test, r=M…
bb0067c 
…ark-Simulacrum

Improve SGX RWLock initializer test

r? `@eddyb`

This addresses pnkfelix#1 (comment)

Fixes fortanix/rust-sgx#213
@jethrogb jethrogb closed this as completed Jan 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement std/rustc Requires changes in Rust std/rustc
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Improve SGX RWLock initializer test jethrogb/rust
1 participant
@jethrogb