Drop build_aarch64_wheels job in favor of ubuntu-24.04-arm os

[justvanrossum]

Derived from fonttools/fonttools@cdf5a6e

This would drop separate macOS x86_64 wheels, in favor of universal2-only. If this isn't desired, I can try to add x86_64 back in. Edit: this was not true

[anthrotype]

universal2-only

it's probably ok by now

[justvanrossum]

Actually, my statement was probably incorrect: perhaps x86_64 is still built. Fingers crossed this first run works at all.

[anthrotype]

This would drop separate macOS x86_64 wheels, in favor of universal2-only

are you sure? I still see "macos-13" listed and I think that one is native x86_64; in combination with auto64.. you'd still get those I believe

[anthrotype]

so, with this new upload/download-artifact actions the name of the artifacts need to be unique...

https://github.com/fonttools/openstep-plist/actions/runs/13056828491/job/36429879715?pr=38#step:6:21

[anthrotype]

see https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/blob/b467579c8d5a8fd642bb81d5922d650ea267d1b6/.github/workflows/wheels.yml#L80

[anthrotype]

you know, I think you could keep the old CIBW_ARCHS: auto64 and simply add "ubuntu-24.04-arm" to the matrix' os list... that should mean that cibuildwheel will build aarch64 which is the native 64-bit architecture for a runner like "ubuntu-24.04-arm"... I haven't tried though

[anthrotype]

and it looks like we weren't building 32-bit windows wheels so far, and nobody bothered.. not sure we should start now?

[justvanrossum]

and it looks like we weren't building 32-bit windows wheels so far, and nobody bothered.. not sure we should start now?

Should I then also undo that wheels-${{ matrix.os }}-${{ matrix.arch }} change?

[anthrotype]

Should I then also undo that wheels-${{ matrix.os }}-${{ matrix.arch }} change?

no it's fine

[justvanrossum]

you know, I think you could keep the old CIBW_ARCHS: auto64 and simply add "ubuntu-24.04-arm" to the matrix' os list... that should mean that cibuildwheel will build aarch64 which is the native 64-bit architecture for a runner like "ubuntu-24.04-arm"...

Isn't the CIBW_ARCHS: ${{ matrix.arch }} line crucial to make the matrix.arch stuff work at all?

[anthrotype]

I mean leaving the old CIBW_ARCHS: auto64 (without parametrizing matrix.arch) might just work for arm64 runner

[anthrotype]

but yeah, for the unique name of the artifact, you need to define some matrix.arch

i'm ok to leave as is

[justvanrossum]

I tried to stay close to what fonttools is doing, and I'm not super comfortable with these kinds of changes to begin with, so if it's ok like this, then 👍

[anthrotype]

I can tag a release or wait if you have any more patches?

[justvanrossum]

A release would be perfect, I have no more patches at this time. Thank you!

[anthrotype]

I pushed v0.5.0 https://github.com/fonttools/openstep-plist/actions/runs/13058435246