Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Subsequent QSO entry (Offline-Mode) #66

Closed
dl2ki opened this issue May 21, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Subsequent QSO entry (Offline-Mode) #66

dl2ki opened this issue May 21, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dl2ki
Copy link

dl2ki commented May 21, 2022

The subsequent entry of QSO's from a paper log (portable) is cumbersome.

Date and time cannot be entered directly into the data fields. The input via a calendar widget or a ComboBox is considerably slower and error-prone.

If the corsor is in the 'Date' data field, a warning message 'Delete the selected contacts?' appears when pressing the DEL key. The functionality of the buttons next to 'Time On' and 'Time Off' is not described.

time_on_off

From my point of view, it would be easier if the date and time were displayed in simple text fields, and you could simply enter the values by hand in offline mode. The existing 3 buttons to the right of the times could be omitted. A button or checkbox 'Offline mode' would have to be added.

@foldynl
Copy link
Owner

foldynl commented May 22, 2022

Using text field has several disadvantages. I will say only the most important. You have to validate an input data and the input data, especially time and date, has many formats around the world. Therefore the specific Date/Time GUI elements are used that have implemented all these validates.

"Offline mode" is not necessary to add because you can stop the timer via shortcut "F8" or "Stop button". Offline mode is not clean solution.

I tried to improve time/date fields

@foldynl foldynl added the enhancement New feature or request label May 22, 2022
@foldynl
Copy link
Owner

foldynl commented May 22, 2022

I have found a solution. To enable field focusing solves the issue. A fix will be a part of next release.

@foldynl
Copy link
Owner

foldynl commented Jun 5, 2022

improved in v0.10

@foldynl foldynl closed this as completed Jun 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants