Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added mount directory to build_rootfs command #439

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2022

Conversation

sondavidb
Copy link
Contributor

@sondavidb sondavidb commented Aug 21, 2022

Signed-off-by: David Son son.david.b@gmail.com

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:
Firecracker's build_rootfs command now supports specifying a mount directory via the -m flag. This should (hopefully) make the pipeline a little less flaky if this is indeed the reason for the command to seemingly randomly fail.

It's worth nothing that if this is the real issue (which it seems to not be), this means we can remove the pipeline concurrency group. I think I shared some info with the team as to what behaviors are shown before the loop device setup fails (specifically, when creating the working directory in the first pipeline step, the ones that fail to setup the loop device seem to have a different setup process than the ones that pass), so maybe a deeper dive into that would help fix pipeline flakiness. Still, this is nice to have.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@ginglis13
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @sondavidb 👍 Can you rebase against main now that #445 has been merged? Buildkite is failing the install step because of this

Signed-off-by: David Son <son.david.b@gmail.com>
@sondavidb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ginglis13 All good I think, had some issues rebasing but I think I did it

@kzys kzys merged commit 09f1a82 into firecracker-microvm:main Sep 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants