Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump FDC local toolkit to v1.8.3. #8263

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025
Merged

Bump FDC local toolkit to v1.8.3. #8263

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

rosalyntan
Copy link
Member

Description

Scenarios Tested

Sample Commands

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @rosalyntan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request bumps the FDC local toolkit to version 1.8.3. The changes involve updating the version, expectedSize, and expectedChecksum fields in src/emulator/downloadableEmulators.ts for the dataconnect emulator for all three platforms (macOS, Windows, and Linux).

Highlights

  • Version Bump: The FDC local toolkit version is updated from 1.8.2 to 1.8.3.
  • Emulator Details Update: The expected size and checksum for the dataconnect emulator are updated for macOS, Windows, and Linux platforms.

Changelog

  • src/emulator/downloadableEmulators.ts
    • Updated dataconnect emulator version from 1.8.2 to 1.8.3 for macOS, Windows, and Linux.
    • Updated expectedSize for dataconnect emulator on macOS, Windows, and Linux.
    • Updated expectedChecksum for dataconnect emulator on macOS, Windows, and Linux.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Trivia time!

What is a checksum and what is it used for?

Click here for the answer
A checksum is a sequence of numbers and letters used to check data integrity during transmission or storage. It's used to detect errors that may have been introduced.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the dataconnect emulator version and associated metadata. The changes appear to be correct and necessary for keeping the emulator up-to-date. I have a minor suggestion regarding comment clarity.

Summary of Findings

  • Comment Clarity: The comment on line 60 could be more descriptive about why the platform check is necessary.

Assessment

The pull request updates the FDC local toolkit version. The changes seem straightforward and necessary for keeping the tool up-to-date. I have identified a few areas for improvement, mainly focusing on comment clarity. Please address these comments and ensure another team member reviews and approves the code before merging.

Comment on lines +62 to +64
version: "1.8.3",
expectedSize: 25535232,
expectedChecksum: "53fb0bf52f21a84b1d6afa70371dd00c",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider adding a comment explaining where these values are sourced from (e.g., release notes, build artifacts).

Comment on lines +68 to +70
version: "1.8.3",
expectedSize: 25965568,
expectedChecksum: "d717235f244e5bbbc00158eae3aa97f0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider adding a comment explaining where these values are sourced from (e.g., release notes, build artifacts).

Comment on lines +73 to +75
version: "1.8.3", // linux
expectedSize: 25448600,
expectedChecksum: "cd381e329a27ff0c81c41d7e635d6733",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider adding a comment explaining where these values are sourced from (e.g., release notes, build artifacts).

@rosalyntan rosalyntan marked this pull request as ready for review February 26, 2025 20:13
@joehan joehan merged commit b84c378 into master Feb 26, 2025
27 of 31 checks passed
@rosalyntan rosalyntan deleted the rosalyntan.bump branch February 26, 2025 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants