-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
InnerSource Vault Metrics #125
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
✅ Deploy Preview for bejewelled-pothos-847ddc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
||
## Key Value areas of InnerSource | ||
|
||
This paper explores a framework for measuring the value of InnerSource practices within organizations, particularly in the financial industry. The metrics are designed to assess financial savings, operational efficiency, and overall engineering health to justify investment in InnerSource initiatives. It is assumed in this paper that the nature of the InnerSource component is internal and specific to the organization and is not something that would be available in the Open Source world. The four key value areas we have explored are:: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Recommend using rationalize instead of justify to make it clear InnerSource doesn't need justification for investment from most angles. However, I understand the need from finance to justify InnerSource investments as they might need more than an explanation.
This paper explores a framework for measuring the value of InnerSource practices within organizations, particularly in the financial industry. The metrics are designed to assess financial savings, operational efficiency, and overall engineering health to justify investment in InnerSource initiatives. It is assumed in this paper that the nature of the InnerSource component is internal and specific to the organization and is not something that would be available in the Open Source world. The four key value areas we have explored are:: | |
This paper explores a framework for measuring the value of InnerSource practices within organizations, particularly in the financial industry. The metrics are designed to assess financial savings, operational efficiency, and overall engineering health to rationalize investment in InnerSource initiatives. It is assumed in this paper that the nature of the InnerSource component is internal and specific to the organization and is not something that would be available in the Open Source world. The four key value areas we have explored are:: |
This paper explores a framework for measuring the value of InnerSource practices within organizations, particularly in the financial industry. The metrics are designed to assess financial savings, operational efficiency, and overall engineering health to justify investment in InnerSource initiatives. It is assumed in this paper that the nature of the InnerSource component is internal and specific to the organization and is not something that would be available in the Open Source world. The four key value areas we have explored are:: | ||
|
||
1. **Development Cost Savings through Reuse** achieved by reusing InnerSource components instead of building new ones across the organization | ||
2. **Improved Time-to-Market (TTM) by consumer-producers** time saved in product delivery by leveraging reusable InnerSource components. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Recommend emphasizing speed as a more specific benefit.
2. **Improved Time-to-Market (TTM) by consumer-producers** time saved in product delivery by leveraging reusable InnerSource components. | |
2. **Accelerated Time-to-Market (TTM) by consumer-producers** time saved in product delivery by leveraging reusable InnerSource components. |
By @chamindra