updating calibration-call slides: more statistics, esca rather than sca

fiedl/hole-ice-study#117
fiedl · Nov 7, 2018 · aa4dfc9 · aa4dfc9
1 parent ba6dc45
commit aa4dfc9
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 13 changed files with 17 additions and 16 deletions.
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_aiz0.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_aiz0.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_azi120deg.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_azi120deg.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_azi240deg.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_azi240deg.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r15cm_esca10cm.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r15cm_esca10cm.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r15cm_esca70cm.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r15cm_esca70cm.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r15cm_sca10cm.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r15cm_sca10cm.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r15cm_sca70cm.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r15cm_sca70cm.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r30cm_esca70cm.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r30cm_esca70cm.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r30cm_sca70cm.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r30cm_sca70cm.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r7-5cm_esca10cm.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r7-5cm_esca10cm.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r7-5cm_sca10cm.png b/latex-beamer/img/summer_scenario_r7-5cm_sca10cm.png
diff --git a/latex-beamer/main.tex b/latex-beamer/main.tex
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 \title{Direct hole-ice simulations with Upgrade-like geometry}
 \subtitle{IceCube Calibration Call 2018-10-19}
-\date{2018-10-19 \\ \vspace*{2mm} \tiny{Document 2018-ahch8Phe}}
+\date{2018-10-19 \\ \vspace*{2mm} \tiny{Document 2018-ahch8Phe} \normalsize \\ \vspace*{8mm} \color{red}{2018-11-07: Updated version with more statistics and effective rather than geometric scattering lengths where the effects are more prominent. \\ New steamshovel video: \url{https://youtu.be/Wiu8CpVQn14}}}
 
 \author[Summer Blot, DESY \& Sebastian Fiedlschuster, ECAP]{Summer Blot \& Sebastian Fiedlschuster}
 %\author[Sebastian Fiedlschuster, ECAP Erlangen]{Sebastian Fiedlschuster \\ \tiny{\url{https://github.com/fiedl/hole-ice-study/issues/117}} \\ \tiny\texttt{sebastian@fiedlschuster.de}}

diff --git a/latex-beamer/text/azimuthal_angles.tex b/latex-beamer/text/azimuthal_angles.tex
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
     \vspace{1cm}
 
     \textbf{YouTube video with Steamshovel visualization}: \\ \vspace{0.2cm}
-    \url{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_QGNdGG9Ew}
+    \url{https://youtu.be/Wiu8CpVQn14}
 
     \vspace{1cm}
 
@@ -52,58 +52,59 @@ \subsection{bubble-column radius $7.5\cm$, geometric scattering length $10\cm$}
 \begin{frame}[fragile]{Simulation results}
   \begin{columns}
     \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
-      \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{img/summer_scenario_r7-5cm_sca10cm}
+      \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{img/summer_scenario_r7-5cm_esca10cm}
     \end{column}
     \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
       \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{img/summerscenario-003}
     \end{column}
   \end{columns}
 
-  \tiny Total photon hit count: 12968 / 1e6
+  \tiny Total photon hit count: 118441 / 1e7
 
   \tiny Configuration: Starting distance $3\m$, plane-wave extent $3\m$, bubble-column geometric scattering length $10\cm$, bulk-ice geometric scattering length $130\cm$.
   \normalsize
 
   \begin{itemize}
     \item For lower polar angles ($\cos\eta \approx 1$), less photons should arrive from azimuths B and C as from azimuth A
-      \tiny as the DOM's PMTs look downwards and photons from B and C are more likely to cross the bubble-column cylinder. \normalsize
-    \item From azimuths B and C, the same number of photons should arrive \tiny due to the symmetry of the scenario (right image). \normalsize
+      \tiny as the DOM's PMTs look downwards and photons from B and C are more likely to cross the bubble-column cylinder. \normalsize \checkmark
+    \item From azimuths B and C, the same number of photons should arrive \tiny due to the symmetry of the scenario (right image). \normalsize \checkmark
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
 \subsection{bubble-column radius $15\cm$, geometric scattering length $10\cm$}
 \begin{frame}[fragile]{Simulation results}
   \begin{columns}
     \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
-      \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{img/summer_scenario_r15cm_sca10cm}
+      \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{img/summer_scenario_r15cm_esca10cm}
     \end{column}
     \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
       \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{img/summerscenario-004}
     \end{column}
   \end{columns}
 
-  \tiny Total photon hit count: 11600 / 1e6
+  \tiny Total photon hit count: 94866 / 1e7
 
   \tiny Configuration: Starting distance $3\m$, plane-wave extent $3\m$, bubble-column geometric scattering length $10\cm$, bulk-ice geometric scattering length $130\cm$.
   \normalsize
 
   \begin{itemize}
-    \item For a larger bubble column with same scattering lenght, the effect should increase. \checkmark
+    \item For a larger bubble column with same scattering length, the effect should increase. \checkmark
+    \item For photons coming from below, the blue curve should see a stronger effect as well. \checkmark
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
 \subsection{bubble-column radius $15\cm$, geometric scattering length $70\cm$}
 \begin{frame}[fragile]{Simulation results}
   \begin{columns}
     \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
-      \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{img/summer_scenario_r15cm_sca70cm}
+      \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{img/summer_scenario_r15cm_esca70cm}
     \end{column}
     \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
       \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{img/summerscenario-004}
     \end{column}
   \end{columns}
 
-  \tiny Total photon hit count: 13115 / 1e6
+  \tiny Total photon hit count: 108198 / 1e7
 
   \tiny Configuration: Starting distance $3\m$, plane-wave extent $3\m$, bubble-column geometric scattering length $70\cm$, bulk-ice geometric scattering length $130\cm$.
   \normalsize
@@ -117,20 +118,20 @@ \subsection{bubble-column radius $30\cm$, geometric scattering length $70\cm$}
 \begin{frame}[fragile]{Simulation results}
   \begin{columns}
     \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
-      \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{img/summer_scenario_r30cm_sca70cm}
+      \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{img/summer_scenario_r30cm_esca70cm}
     \end{column}
     \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
       \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{img/summerscenario-005}
     \end{column}
   \end{columns}
 
-  \tiny Total photon hit count: 12339 / 1e6
+  \tiny Total photon hit count: 72595 / 1e7
 
   \tiny Configuration: Starting distance $3\m$, plane-wave extent $3\m$, bubble-column geometric scattering length $70\cm$, bulk-ice geometric scattering length $130\cm$.
   \normalsize
 
   \begin{itemize}
-    \item For a larger bubble column, the effect should increase.
+    \item For a larger bubble column, the effect should increase. \checkmark
     \item Less photons should arrive in total \tiny as the whole DOM is now shielded by the hole ice. \normalsize \checkmark
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
@@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ \subsection{Compare different bubble columns for same angle}
 
   \begin{itemize}
     \item Comparing different bubble columns for the same direction of incoming photons.
-    \item For a stronger or larger bubble column, the effect should increase.
+    \item For a stronger or larger bubble column, the effect should increase. \checkmark
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
@@ -173,7 +174,7 @@ \section{}
 
   YouTube video of the simulation:
 
-  \url{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_QGNdGG9Ew}
+  \url{https://youtu.be/Wiu8CpVQn14}
 
   \end{center}
 \end{frame}