Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Benchmark performance: how much does the hole ice simulation cost? #18

Open
1 of 3 tasks
fiedl opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Benchmark performance: how much does the hole ice simulation cost? #18

fiedl opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
overview keep track of a group of issues performance

Comments

@fiedl
Copy link
Owner

fiedl commented Feb 1, 2018 •
edited
Loading

@fiedl fiedl added overview keep track of a group of issues performance labels May 25, 2018
@fiedl
Copy link
Owner Author

fiedl commented Aug 20, 2018

Performance comparison in flasher simulations:
2018-07-16

[2018-07-16 15:27:14] fiedl@kepler00 /afs/ifh.de/group/amanda/scratch/fiedl/ho
▶ ./run.rb --width=127 --brightness=127 --hole-ice=approximation

[2018-07-16 14:58:38] fiedl@kepler00 /afs/ifh.de/group/amanda/scratch/fiedl/ho
▶ ./run.rb --width=127 --brightness=127 --thinning-factor=0.1

Results:

  • Standard clsim with 1/10 thinning: 11min
  • New medium-propagation algorithm
    without hole-ice cylinders, with 1/10 thinnng: 10min
  • New medium-propagation algorithm
    with sca_hi = 1/10 sca_bulk,
    with 1/10 thinning: 15min

fiedl added a commit to fiedl/hole-ice-latex that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2018
@fiedl
writing about performance considerations
4c98941 
fiedl/hole-ice-study#18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
overview keep track of a group of issues performance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@fiedl