Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes to centos and debian. support utopic. support fedora 19,20,21. #28

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

obnoxxx
Copy link
Contributor

@obnoxxx obnoxxx commented Jan 5, 2015

Hi,

here are a few fixes to the vagrant-lxc-base-boxes repo, especially centos.
Maybe my increases to the sleeps are not acceptable generally, but on my
fedora host system, I need them... :-/

Also a few newly supported boxes: fedora 19,20,21 and ubuntu utopic.

Thanks for consideration - Michael

obnoxxx added 15 commits January 2, 2015 16:38
…ased boxes.

Without ssh server installed, "vagrant up" will fail when using this base box.
… come up.

This might to be due to some registration with systemd.
Somehow bringing up the network takes longer on my fedora host.
Possibly related to some integration / registration with systemd.
And I don't know a package to provide the same classes.
without it, "vagrant up" fails.
Currently only f20 and f19 are provided by the lxc-download template,
not f21.
The download template doesn't have f21 (yet).
So use fedora template for lxc-create.

Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
@fgrehm
Copy link
Owner

fgrehm commented Dec 6, 2015

Sorry for the huge delay but this project has been deprecated and this PR is no longer mergeable 😢 I'm doing a last round of merging some outstanding PRs but unfortunately this one is not going to make it.

If you are still maintaining your fork, feel free to shoot me a PR updating the README with a link to it and I'll merge it right away.

🍻

@obnoxxx
Copy link
Contributor Author

obnoxxx commented Dec 7, 2015

Thanks for the notice, Fabio.
It is a pity that you don't maintain the vagrant-related projects any more.
I created PR #41 as you suggested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants