You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 12, 2018. It is now read-only.
It's important that this is taken into account in at least some fashion.
GML
A negative mean attribute of an edge indicates overlap.
GFA
We should be able to use CIGAR strings for links in order to determine overlap.
Perhaps we could (at least temporarily) indicate overlap edges as dotted or dashed edges. Ideally we'd actually overlay nodes visually, but I'm not sure how to reconcile that with GraphViz' layout parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since it seems like the vast majority of edges in at least the
GML assembly graphs I'm working with now are overlaps, I figure using
the fancy option for non-overlapping edges is a more efficient
approach (and sort of makes sense if you think of non-overlapping
edges as "fragmented", I guess?).
Work remains to be done here to make this make sense for GFA and
LastGraph files. See #190 for more info.
fedarko
changed the title
Visualize overlap attributes of edges
Visualize overlap attributes of edges (resolve ambiguities in GFA/LastGraph files)
May 22, 2017
GFA support (read CIGAR string in the preprocessing step, and store that info in the .db file)
Ensure that this doesn't produce ambiguities in LastGraph files (since overlap data doesn't seem to be given for those graphs, make sure that the user knows that solid edges in that case don't mean overlaps)
It's important that this is taken into account in at least some fashion.
GML
A negative
mean
attribute of an edge indicates overlap.GFA
We should be able to use CIGAR strings for links in order to determine overlap.
Perhaps we could (at least temporarily) indicate overlap edges as dotted or dashed edges. Ideally we'd actually overlay nodes visually, but I'm not sure how to reconcile that with GraphViz' layout parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: