Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

secret-store: Add created_at fields to store and secret #387

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2022

Conversation

awilliams-fastly
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@joeshaw joeshaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. One question below about the ordering of output

Comment on lines +20 to 29
{
"name": "TestClient_ListSecrets-01",
"digest": "UpTE7iRgHnf0hsQd23RoE7YET3NSptFrJbU79XgHi/g=",
"created_at": "2022-11-28T22:40:40Z"
},
{
"name": "TestClient_ListSecrets-00",
"digest": "hHC5cATutIsYicNSPlBUzLfd0aGWKoPi1UG8MDuQpps="
"digest": "LeEouWciqTNp+5SKYYjM2elJwI4OnzRUMkhLNrRWsHk=",
"created_at": "2022-11-28T22:40:39Z"
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the ordering meaningful at all here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The response ordering from the API isn't by name, so this ordering seems ok to me and shouldn't affect the test case.

@awilliams-fastly awilliams-fastly marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2022 20:29
@awilliams-fastly awilliams-fastly merged commit 0f714c5 into main Nov 30, 2022
@awilliams-fastly awilliams-fastly deleted the awilliams/secret-store-created-at branch November 30, 2022 20:34
@Integralist Integralist added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants