Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

travis: clang-3.6 -> clang-4.0 #2127

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

travis: clang-3.6 -> clang-4.0 #2127

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

grooverdan
Copy link
Contributor

just realised when I updated the .travis.yml to trusty the llvm repo was still precise. Update this and clang-4.0.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@IslamAbdelRahman has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@siying has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@siying has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@sagar0
Copy link
Contributor

sagar0 commented May 23, 2017

@grooverdan Can you rebase and update this PR. I'll merge as soon as that's taken care of.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Black <daniel.black@au.ibm.com>
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@grooverdan updated the pull request - view changes - changes since last import

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@sagar0 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@sagar0 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@grooverdan grooverdan deleted the travis-clang-trusty branch May 24, 2017 23:00
@grooverdan
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants