-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix unmounting performance regression in V8 #7232
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gaearon I have a couple of questions about this solution, could you please explain this.
inst._rootNodeId
and not it's'.' + inst._rootNodeId
. How this could be the same thing as there're no other changes?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't break existing behavior because there is no observable difference as to what we use for keys. We just need to store some stuff on an object for each ID.
It improves perf because of some weird way V8 treats numeric keys. When all keys are numeric (like IDs are), for some reason
delete
becomes slower. Maybe it is similar to how sparse arrays are deoptimized. However if keys are not numeric (which we force by adding a dot before the number) it appears to create hash tables for those objects which is exactly what we want.In general relying on something like this is very brittle. It is just VM implementation detail and can change any day. Still, if we can easily fix it without affecting performance in other engines, I think it's worth doing like in this case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not just
toString
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is still a "numeric" key as considered by V8. (I tried that and it doesn't help.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't forget, I am as puzzled that this works as you are. 😄 I don't have good explanations, I'm just saying I tried other ways and they didn't help.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what you get with a dynamically typed language 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Guys, seems pretty reasonable for me now. @gaearon Thanks!
Also it seems that
getDictionaryKey
should have a good explanation, comment above. V8's being developed so this could be irrelevant eventually.