-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Warning if React.forwardRef render function doesn't take exactly two arguments is confusing when more than 2 arguments #13627
Comments
Happy to take a PR for “option 1”. The purpose of accepting more arguments is not clear to me because they’d never get filled in. |
Cool. I will make a PR tonight |
We might want to add a note about an argument rest as well? |
I think it shouldn't warn about 0 arguments. |
* Enhance dev warnings for forwardRef render function - For 0 parameters: Do not warn because it may be due to usage of the arguments object. - For 1 parameter: Warn about missing the 'ref' parameter. - For 2 parameters: This is the ideal. Do not warn. - For more than 2 parameters: Warn about undefined parameters. * Make test cases for forwardRef warnings more realistic * Add period to warning sentence
Should be fixed in 16.5.1 |
…acebook#13636) * Enhance dev warnings for forwardRef render function - For 0 parameters: Do not warn because it may be due to usage of the arguments object. - For 1 parameter: Warn about missing the 'ref' parameter. - For 2 parameters: This is the ideal. Do not warn. - For more than 2 parameters: Warn about undefined parameters. * Make test cases for forwardRef warnings more realistic * Add period to warning sentence
…acebook#13636) * Enhance dev warnings for forwardRef render function - For 0 parameters: Do not warn because it may be due to usage of the arguments object. - For 1 parameter: Warn about missing the 'ref' parameter. - For 2 parameters: This is the ideal. Do not warn. - For more than 2 parameters: Warn about undefined parameters. * Make test cases for forwardRef warnings more realistic * Add period to warning sentence
This warning is still visible in react 17.0.1 |
I've just got this error after running npm update. (React v17) |
Just put a debugger and saw that these errors ar comming from MUI |
Me too |
Yes, I am reporting this issue as well. Will create a ticket for MUI if there isn't one already. |
@gvanriper yes, that was the reason, already switched. Thanks for letting others know |
Hello all,
Unfortunatelly in browser Im getting this irritating warning, even if I pass the ref from the top component. Especially the warning is very annoying in jest logs. |
Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
A feature (an improvement)
What is the current behavior?
When defining more than two parameters for a React.forwardRef render function a warning message stating "forwardRef render functions accept two parameters: props and ref. Did you forget to use the ref parameter?" gets logged.
If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem. Your bug will get fixed much faster if we can run your code and it doesn't have dependencies other than React. Paste the link to your JSFiddle (https://jsfiddle.net/Luktwrdm/) or CodeSandbox (https://codesandbox.io/s/new) example below:
https://codesandbox.io/s/5v704qxvnx
What is the expected behavior?
Option 1
Overall the message could be more explicit on accepting exactly two parameters. Also, when the arity is greater than 2 the second part of the message may be omitted. For instance:
""forwardRef render functions accept exactly two parameters: props and ref"
Option 2
If defining more than 2 arguments to the function is ok, which may be the case since the real goal for this warning is just to make sure people use the ref parameter, I think the message could not be shown for arity > 2, therefore chaging the condition of
=== 2
to> 1
.Which versions of React, and which browser / OS are affected by this issue? Did this work in previous versions of React?
16.5.0 which is the one that includes this new warning
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: