Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

node <> model 3/n: update should_transition_to_next_node #2447

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mgarrard
Copy link
Contributor

@mgarrard mgarrard commented May 9, 2024

Summary:
This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label May 9, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57132018

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57132018

mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebook#2447

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
@mgarrard mgarrard force-pushed the export-D57132018 branch from b1740c3 to 56a4ee1 Compare May 9, 2024 19:46
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.31%. Comparing base (af24449) to head (ec7805a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2447   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.31%   95.31%           
=======================================
  Files         496      496           
  Lines       48274    48300   +26     
=======================================
+ Hits        46012    46039   +27     
+ Misses       2262     2261    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
@mgarrard mgarrard force-pushed the export-D57132018 branch from 56a4ee1 to 29c3146 Compare May 9, 2024 20:12
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57132018

mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Differential Revision: D57132018
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 11, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan

Differential Revision: D57132018
@mgarrard mgarrard force-pushed the export-D57132018 branch from 29c3146 to bbb9873 Compare May 11, 2024 16:45
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57132018

mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 11, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan

Differential Revision: D57132018
@mgarrard mgarrard force-pushed the export-D57132018 branch from bbb9873 to 6dbffd2 Compare May 11, 2024 17:28
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57132018

mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 11, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan

Differential Revision: D57132018
@mgarrard mgarrard force-pushed the export-D57132018 branch from 6dbffd2 to ec00415 Compare May 13, 2024 16:52
mgarrard added a commit to mgarrard/Ax that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan

Differential Revision: D57132018
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57132018

Summary:

This diff builds on the previous diff, and uses the new property that we added for TC to decide if the gs should move forward.

If all criterion that specificy a transition edge between nodes are met, we move to that node. We progress through tc in order -- meaning when constructing a gs tc ordering is important.

Reviewed By: lena-kashtelyan

Differential Revision: D57132018
@mgarrard mgarrard force-pushed the export-D57132018 branch from ec00415 to ec7805a Compare May 13, 2024 16:53
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57132018

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 8926797.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants