Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Isolate better BT low level code #patch #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 1, 2020

Conversation

fabricepipart
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #166 into master will increase coverage by 2.17%.
The diff coverage is 74.19%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #166      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.75%   86.92%   +2.17%     
==========================================
  Files          90       89       -1     
  Lines        2564     2554      -10     
  Branches      204      204              
==========================================
+ Hits         2173     2220      +47     
+ Misses        318      261      -57     
  Partials       73       73
Flag Coverage Δ
#javaserver 88.5% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#pythonclient 82.02% <74.19%> (+8.72%) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/main/client/scan/demo_scanner.py 100% <100%> (+4.34%) ⬆️
src/main/client/trd.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/main/client/scan/blescan.py 27.96% <28.57%> (+27.96%) ⬆️
src/main/client/scan/bluetooth_scanner.py 75% <72.72%> (+75%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f9e9e53...97111ec. Read the comment docs.

@fabricepipart fabricepipart merged commit de30019 into master Jan 1, 2020
@fabricepipart fabricepipart deleted the bugfix/isolate-bt-code branch February 4, 2020 07:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants