Add Elm Analyzer comments for concept exercise ticket-please
#2293
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
track/elm
analyzer-comments/elm/ticket-please/assignTicketTo_ignore_cases.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
analyzer-comments/elm/ticket-please/assignTicketTo_use_record_update.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| # destructure assignTicketTo argument | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is only tangential, but I don't think there is any reference to the as syntax in the concept or exercise docs. I had a google and this cheatsheet was the best source I could find.
https://gist.github.com/yang-wei/4f563fbf81ff843e8b1e#record
Maybe we should add it here, and to the exercise and concept docs, what do you think? Or maybe we should create our own documentation for as, or open a PR to one of the existing elm documentation sites?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We use it in the last example in the introduction of the concept, and we use this link: https://github.com/izdi/elm-cheat-sheet#operators
Both those links are a bit shabby, so I like the idea of contributing to some docs, but which?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess we can initially explain it will on exercism, in the concept, where we have full control and can do everything.
Those links are shabby, maybe we could put a shout out on the Elm slack? It's possible that any PR to the main slack won't get merged, but maybe elm-programming or something like that would like it ...
Co-authored-by: Cedd Burge <ceddlyburge@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@exercism/reviewers can I have an approval please? 💛 |
Sister PR over here.
@ceddlyburge can you take a look?
There are quite a few and I wrote these when I was a little too tired for my own good, so please proofread them carefully.