[Chore] Upgrade Angular From v12 to v16 #423
Conversation
- Updated @ngxs/store, @ngxs/devtools-plugin, and @ngxs/router-plugin to 3.8.2
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request encompass modifications across several configuration and source files. Key updates include the renaming of packages in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.
Next stepsWhat is a critical CVE?Contains a Critical Common Vulnerability and Exposure (CVE). Remove or replace dependencies that include known critical CVEs. Consumers can use dependency overrides or npm audit fix --force to remove vulnerable dependencies. Take a deeper look at the dependencyTake a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev. Remove the packageIf you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency. Mark a package as acceptable riskTo ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (31)
webapp/tsconfig.json (2)
22-22: Approved: Addition ofuseDefineForClassFields: falseThe addition of
"useDefineForClassFields": falseis appropriate for maintaining compatibility during the Angular upgrade process. This setting ensures that class fields behave as they did in previous versions of TypeScript, which can prevent unexpected breaking changes in existing code.Note that while this setting is correct for now, it's worth considering the following:
- This option might need to be revisited in future upgrades, as the ECMAScript standard is moving towards using
definesemantics for class fields.- In the long term, you may want to plan for migrating your code to work with the standard
definesemantics for class fields, which would allow you to remove this option or set it totrue.For now, this change is correct and necessary for a smooth upgrade process.
Line range hint
1-26: Overall assessment: Changes align with Angular upgrade objectivesThe modifications to
tsconfig.jsonare appropriate and necessary for the upgrade from Angular v12 to v16. The target update to ES2022, improved formatting, and the addition of theuseDefineForClassFieldsoption collectively contribute to a smoother upgrade process while maintaining compatibility with existing code.As the project moves forward with Angular v16, consider the following recommendations:
- Regularly review and update the
browserslistconfiguration to ensure it aligns with your project's browser support requirements.- Plan for future updates to class field behavior, potentially removing the
useDefineForClassFieldsoption when it's no longer needed.- Explore and leverage new language features enabled by the ES2022 target to improve code quality and maintainability.
These changes provide a solid foundation for the Angular upgrade and future development of the project.
webapp/src/app/auth/guards/auth.guard.ts (1)
Line range hint
14-23: Consider TypeScript improvements for thecanActivatemethodThe
canActivatemethod implementation remains unchanged, which is good for maintaining existing functionality. However, with the upgrade to Angular 16, we can take advantage of some TypeScript improvements.The current implementation is correct and maintains the expected behavior.
Consider the following TypeScript improvements:
Use more specific return type:
canActivate(next: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, state: RouterStateSnapshot): Observable<boolean> { // ... (existing implementation) }Utilize the
injectfunction for dependency injection (introduced in Angular 14):import { inject } from '@angular/core'; import { Store } from '@ngxs/store'; @Injectable({ providedIn: 'root', }) export class AuthGuard { private store = inject(Store); canActivate(next: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, state: RouterStateSnapshot): Observable<boolean> { // ... (existing implementation) } }These changes can make the code more type-safe and align it with modern Angular practices.
webapp/src/app/shared/guards/can.guard.ts (2)
Line range hint
20-23: Consider enhancing thecanActivatemethod for improved type safety and error handlingWhile the
canActivatemethod's implementation appears correct, consider the following improvements:
- Use type assertion for
next.data['roles']to ensure type safety.- Add null checks for
useranduser.roleto prevent potential runtime errors.- Consider using
Array.includes()instead offindIndex() >= 0for better readability.Here's a suggested refactoring:
canActivate(next: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, state: RouterStateSnapshot): Observable<boolean> { const roles = (next.data['roles'] as string[]) || []; return this.user$.pipe( map(user => !!user && !!user.role && roles.includes(user.role)) ); }This refactoring improves type safety, adds null checks, and simplifies the role checking logic.
Line range hint
1-24: Summary and Next StepsThe changes to
CanGuardappear to be related to the Angular upgrade from v12 to v16. While the core functionality remains intact, there are a few points to address:
- Verify the intentional removal of the
CanActivateinterface implementation and ensure it's consistent with Angular v16 best practices.- Consider the suggested improvements to the
canActivatemethod for better type safety and error handling.- Ensure that these changes are consistently applied across all guard files in the project.
- Update the project's documentation to reflect any changes in how guards are implemented and used in the upgraded Angular version.
Please review these suggestions and make any necessary adjustments to ensure the guard functions correctly within the upgraded Angular framework.
webapp/src/app/auth/components/forgot-password/forgot-password.component.ts (1)
18-18: Approved: Constructor updated to use UntypedFormBuilderThe change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderin the constructor is correct and consistent with the import statement update. This maintains the current functionality while preparing for future Angular updates.For future improvements, consider migrating to typed forms when upgrading to Angular 14+. This would involve using
FormBuilderwith explicit typing for better type safety. For example:forgotPasswordForm = this.fb.group({ email: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.email]], } as const);This change would provide better type inference and catch potential errors at compile-time.
webapp/src/app/auth/components/login/login.component.ts (3)
2-2: Approved: Import statement updated for Angular v16 compatibilityThe change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis consistent with the Angular upgrade from v12 to v16. This modification maintains backwards compatibility with the previous form behavior.Note that while this change doesn't affect functionality, it may impact type checking. Consider migrating to the new typed forms API in the future for improved type safety.
29-29: Approved: Constructor parameter updated to use UntypedFormBuilderThe change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderin the constructor parameter is consistent with the import statement change and ensures that the component usesUntypedFormBuilderthroughout.While this change maintains compatibility with the Angular upgrade, consider the following future improvement:
In a future update, consider migrating to the new typed forms API for improved type safety. This would involve:
- Changing back to
FormBuilderinstead ofUntypedFormBuilder.- Updating the form initialization to use typed form controls.
- Adjusting the form access methods to leverage the typed nature of the forms.
This migration will provide better type checking and catch potential errors at compile-time.
Line range hint
1-58: Verified: Component remains consistent with UntypedFormBuilder usageThe changes to use
UntypedFormBuilderare consistent throughout the component. The form initialization, usage, and access methods remain unchanged, which is correct asUntypedFormBuildermaintains the same API asFormBuilder.For future improvements:
- Consider migrating to typed forms for better type safety.
- Update the
onSubmit()method to use type-safe form value access.- Refactor the getter methods for form controls to leverage typed forms.
Example of a type-safe form initialization:
loginForm = this.fb.group({ email: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.email]] as const, password: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(8)]] as const, });This change would provide better type inference for form controls and their values.
webapp/src/app/auth/components/signup/signup.component.ts (2)
35-35: Approved: Constructor parameter type updatedThe change of the constructor parameter type from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis correct and consistent with the import statement modification. This ensures that the dependency injection uses the appropriate type for the Angular version being used.For future improvements, consider:
- Migrating to the new typed forms API introduced in Angular 14+ for better type safety.
- Updating the
signupFormcreation to use the new typed forms syntax when you decide to migrate.Example of future typed form usage:
signupForm = this.fb.group({ name: ['', Validators.required], email: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.email]], password: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(this.passwordMinLength)]], } as const); // 'as const' assertion for stricter typing
Line range hint
1-69: Overall review: Changes are minimal and correct, with opportunities for future improvementsThe changes made to this component are minimal and correctly implemented as part of the Angular upgrade process. The switch to
UntypedFormBuilderensures compatibility with the newer Angular version while maintaining the existing functionality.However, there are opportunities for future improvements:
- Consider migrating to the new typed forms API in a future update for improved type safety.
- Evaluate the use of NGXS for state management. While it's a valid choice, you might want to consider alternatives like NgRx or the built-in Angular services for simpler state management needs.
- Review and potentially update the error handling and validation logic to ensure it meets the latest Angular best practices.
- Consider adding unit tests or updating existing ones to cover the form submission and validation logic thoroughly.
To prepare for future updates and maintain code quality:
- Create a plan for migrating to typed forms across the application.
- Review the state management strategy and ensure it scales well with the application's needs.
- Implement comprehensive unit testing for this and other components.
webapp/src/app/projects/components/new-term/new-term.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-85: Consider future migration to strongly-typed forms.While the current changes are correct for the Angular upgrade, using
UntypedFormBuildermeans losing some type safety. In future updates, consider migrating to strongly-typed forms (e.g., usingFormBuilderwith explicit typing) for better type checking and IDE support. This would involve:
- Changing back to
FormBuilderimport.- Defining interfaces for your form structure.
- Using those interfaces when creating form groups.
This is not required for the current upgrade but could be a valuable future improvement.
webapp/src/app/auth/components/reset-password/reset-password.component.ts (4)
Line range hint
37-37: Consider removing emptyngOnInitmethod.The
ngOnInitmethod is currently empty. If it's not needed, consider removing it to keep the component cleaner.- ngOnInit() {}
36-36: Remove unusedtokenIsInvalidproperty.The
tokenIsInvalidproperty is declared but never used in the component. Consider removing it if it's not needed.- tokenIsInvalid = false;
Line range hint
60-61: Simplify string literal in alert.The alert message uses a string literal with mixed quotes. Consider using template literals for better readability.
- // tslint:disable-next-line:quotemark - return alert("Can't reset password. Please make sure you open the link sent to your email."); + return alert(`Can't reset password. Please make sure you open the link sent to your email.`);
Line range hint
15-80: Consider implementingOnDestroyto unsubscribe from observables.The component implements
OnDestroy, but it's only used to dispatch aClearMessagesaction. Consider unsubscribing from the observables (statusMessage$,errorMessage$,isLoading$) to prevent potential memory leaks.Here's a suggested implementation:
import { Component, OnDestroy, OnInit } from '@angular/core'; import { UntypedFormBuilder, Validators } from '@angular/forms'; import { ActivatedRoute } from '@angular/router'; import { Select, Store } from '@ngxs/store'; import { Observable, Subject } from 'rxjs'; import { takeUntil } from 'rxjs/operators'; import { ClearMessages, ResetPassword } from '../../stores/auth.state'; @Component({ selector: 'app-reset-password', templateUrl: './reset-password.component.html', styleUrls: ['./reset-password.component.css'], }) export class ResetPasswordComponent implements OnDestroy { private destroy$ = new Subject<void>(); // ... rest of the component code ... ngOnDestroy() { this.store.dispatch(new ClearMessages()); this.destroy$.next(); this.destroy$.complete(); } // ... rest of the component code ... }Then, in the constructor or wherever you're subscribing to the observables:
this.statusMessage$.pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy$)).subscribe(/* ... */); this.errorMessage$.pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy$)).subscribe(/* ... */); this.isLoading$.pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy$)).subscribe(/* ... */);This ensures that all subscriptions are properly cleaned up when the component is destroyed.
webapp/src/app/projects/components/add-team-member/add-team-member.component.ts (3)
41-41: LGTM: Constructor updated to use UntypedFormBuilder.The change in the constructor parameter type from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis correct and consistent with the import statement change. This ensures that the component uses theUntypedFormBuilderthroughout its implementation, which is necessary for the Angular upgrade.For future improvements, consider migrating to typed forms once the upgrade is complete and stable. Typed forms provide better type safety and can help catch errors at compile-time. This can be done by:
- Changing back to
FormBuilderfromUntypedFormBuilder.- Defining interfaces for your form structures.
- Using the new typed methods like
this.fb.group<YourFormInterface>({ ... }).
Line range hint
70-77: Consider simplifying async logic and improving error handling.The
addTeamMembermethod mixesasync/awaitwith Promise syntax. Consider simplifying it to use onlyasync/awaitfor better readability and error handling:async addTeamMember() { const email = this.email.value as string; const roleString = this.role.value as string; const role = ProjectRole[$enum(ProjectRole).getKeyOrThrow(roleString)]; if (this.projectId && email && role) { try { await this.store.dispatch(new AddProjectInvite(this.projectId, email, role)).toPromise(); this.modal.close(); } catch (error) { // Handle error (e.g., show error message to user) console.error('Failed to add team member:', error); } } }This change allows for better error handling and provides a clearer flow of the asynchronous operation.
Line range hint
18-77: Implement proper observable unsubscription to prevent memory leaks.The component implements
OnDestroy, but it doesn't unsubscribe from the observables (errorMessage$andisLoading$). To prevent potential memory leaks, consider implementing proper unsubscription:
- Import
Subjectfrom RxJS:import { Observable, Subject } from 'rxjs'; import { takeUntil } from 'rxjs/operators';
- Add a destroy$ subject to the component:
private destroy$ = new Subject<void>();
- Update the
ngOnInitmethod to subscribe to the observables and usetakeUntil:ngOnInit() { this.errorMessage$.pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy$)).subscribe(/* handle error message */); this.isLoading$.pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy$)).subscribe(/* handle loading state */); }
- Update the
ngOnDestroymethod:ngOnDestroy() { this.store.dispatch(new ClearMessages()); this.destroy$.next(); this.destroy$.complete(); }These changes ensure that all subscriptions are properly cleaned up when the component is destroyed, preventing potential memory leaks.
webapp/src/app/projects/components/new-label/new-label.component.ts (2)
2-2: Update toUntypedFormBuilderas part of Angular upgradeThe change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis consistent with the Angular upgrade from v12 to v16. This modification is part of Angular's migration strategy towards stricter form typing.While this change doesn't affect the current functionality, it's important to note:
- It may reduce type checking for form controls, potentially making the code more prone to runtime errors.
- In future Angular versions, you might want to migrate to the new typed forms API for improved type safety.
Consider planning a future task to migrate to the new typed forms API when it becomes more stable and widely adopted. This will improve type safety and catch potential errors at compile-time rather than runtime.
43-43: Constructor updated to useUntypedFormBuilderThe constructor parameter has been correctly updated to use
UntypedFormBuilder, which is consistent with the import statement change. This modification ensures that the component uses the untyped form builder throughout its implementation.While this change is necessary for the Angular upgrade, consider the following future improvements:
- Evaluate the possibility of migrating to Angular's new typed forms API in the future. This would involve changing back to
FormBuilderand adding explicit types to your form controls.- If migrating to typed forms, update the
formproperty initialization to use typed controls, which will provide better type inference and catch potential errors at compile-time.Example of future typed form (not to be implemented now):
form = this.fb.group({ value: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.maxLength(30), Validators.pattern('.*[^ ].*')]], color: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.pattern('^#([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$')]], } as const);webapp/src/app/projects/components/edit-label/edit-label.component.ts (1)
2-2: Approved: Import statement updated for Angular v16 compatibility.The change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis consistent with the Angular upgrade from v12 to v16. This modification maintains backwards compatibility with the previous behavior ofFormBuilder.However, be aware that using
UntypedFormBuildermay lead to less strict type checking for form controls. Consider gradually migrating to the new typed forms API in future updates to improve type safety.webapp/src/app/projects/components/project-settings/project-settings.component.ts (3)
2-2: Approval: Import statement updated for Angular v16 compatibilityThe change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis consistent with Angular's evolution towards stricter typing in forms. This modification is part of the upgrade process from Angular v12 to v16.Consider gradually migrating to the new typed forms API in future updates for improved type safety and better developer experience.
33-33: Approval: Constructor updated to use UntypedFormBuilderThe change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderin the constructor is correct and consistent with the import statement change. This modification ensures compatibility with Angular v16.For future improvements, consider:
- Gradually migrating to the new typed forms API for better type safety.
- Updating the
detailsForminitialization to use the new typed forms syntax when ready.
Line range hint
18-24: Suggestion: Consider adopting typed forms in the futureWhile the current implementation works correctly with
UntypedFormBuilder, it doesn't leverage the benefits of Angular's new typed forms API. In future iterations, consider updating thedetailsForminitialization and usage to take advantage of improved type checking and IntelliSense support.Would you like assistance in creating a task or GitHub issue to track the future migration to typed forms? This could include examples of how to update the
detailsForminitialization and related methods.webapp/src/app/projects/components/add-api-client/add-api-client.component.ts (3)
2-2: Approved: Import statement updated for Angular compatibility.The change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis correct and aligns with Angular's migration guide for upgrading to v14+. This modification ensures backwards compatibility with the previous behavior ofFormBuilder.Consider planning for a future migration to use the new strictly typed forms API introduced in Angular 14. This will provide better type safety and catch potential errors at compile-time. The migration can be done gradually, starting with new forms and then updating existing ones.
43-43: Approved: Constructor updated to use UntypedFormBuilder.The change in the constructor parameter type from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis correct and consistent with the import statement change. This modification ensures that the component continues to work as expected after the Angular upgrade.For future improvements, consider updating the form initialization to use the new strictly typed forms API. This can be done by changing:
form = this.fb.group({ name: ['', [Validators.required]], role: [this.defaultRole, [Validators.required]], });to:
form = this.fb.group({ name: ['', {validators: [Validators.required], nonNullable: true}], role: [this.defaultRole, {validators: [Validators.required], nonNullable: true}], });This change will provide better type inference and catch potential errors at compile-time.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall feedback: Angular upgrade changes look good.The changes made to this component are consistent with the Angular upgrade process from v12 to v16. The switch to
UntypedFormBuilderis a necessary step to maintain backwards compatibility during the upgrade. The component's core functionality remains intact, which is crucial for a smooth transition.As you continue with the Angular upgrade process, consider the following next steps:
- Gradually migrate to the new strictly typed forms API for improved type safety.
- Review and update other components and services in a similar manner.
- After completing the upgrade, run thorough tests to ensure all functionality works as expected in Angular 16.
- Consider enabling strict type checking in TypeScript configuration to catch potential type-related issues early.
webapp/src/app/app.module.ts (1)
Issues Found in Angular Module Upgrade
Several deprecated Angular patterns were detected:
Lifecycle Hooks:
ngOnChangesin:
webapp/src/app/shared/components/select-locale/select-locale.component.tswebapp/src/app/shared/components/select-label/select-label.component.tswebapp/src/app/shared/components/editable-text/editable-text.component.tsDecorators:
@HostListenerin:
webapp/src/app/shared/directives/dropzone.directive.tswebapp/src/app/shared/directives/autoheight.directive.tswebapp/src/app/shared/directives/autowidth.directive.tsTemplate Syntax Issues:
[(ngModel)]usage in:
webapp/src/app/projects/components/import-locale/import-locale.component.htmlwebapp/src/app/projects/components/export-locale/export-locale.component.htmlThese areas may require updates to ensure compatibility with Angular 16.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-85: Verify Angular 16 compatibility across the moduleWhile the visible changes in this file are minimal, upgrading from Angular 12 to 16 may require additional adjustments throughout the application. Please ensure that:
- All imported modules and libraries are compatible with Angular 16.
- The syntax and usage of Angular features throughout the application have been updated to align with Angular 16 standards.
- Deprecated APIs or features that were removed in Angular 16 have been addressed.
It may be helpful to run Angular's update schematics and address any warnings or errors that arise.
To assist in verifying the upgrade, you can run the following command to check for any remaining Angular-related deprecations or potential issues:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Angular-related deprecations or potential issues # Search for common Angular deprecation patterns rg --type typescript -i '(deprecated|ngOnChanges|ViewChild.*{static|ContentChild.*{static|renderer2?\.listen|@HostListener|@ViewChildren|@ContentChildren)' # Search for potential template syntax issues rg --type html '(\[\(ngModel\)\]|\{\{.*\?\?.*\}\}|\{\{.*\|\s*async.*\}\}|<ng-container\s*\*ngIf=".*\$any\(.*\).*">)'Length of output: 1061
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected regex search for Angular-related deprecations or potential issues # Search for common Angular deprecation patterns with fixed regex rg --type typescript -i '(deprecated|ngOnChanges|ViewChild\s*\(\s*.*\s*\)\s*.*\s*{static:|ContentChild\s*\(\s*.*\s*\)\s*.*\s*{static:|renderer2\.listen|@HostListener|@ViewChildren|@ContentChildren)' # Search for potential template syntax issues rg --type html '(\[\(ngModel\)\]|\{\{.*\?\?.*\}\}|\{\{.*\|\s*async.*\}\}|<ng-container\s*\*ngIf=".*\$any\(.*\).*">)'Length of output: 1168
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Separate regex searches for Angular-related deprecations or potential issues # Search for deprecated decorators or lifecycle hooks rg --type typescript -i 'deprecated|ngOnChanges' # Search for ViewChild with static option rg --type typescript -i 'ViewChild\s*\(\s*.*\s*\)\s*\{\s*static:' # Search for ContentChild with static option rg --type typescript -i 'ContentChild\s*\(\s*.*\s*\)\s*\{\s*static:' # Search for renderer2.listen usage rg --type typescript -i 'renderer2\.listen' # Search for HostListener decorator rg --type typescript -i '@HostListener' # Search for ViewChildren decorator rg --type typescript -i '@ViewChildren' # Search for ContentChildren decorator rg --type typescript -i '@ContentChildren' # Search for potential template syntax issues rg --type html '(\[\(ngModel\)\]|\{\{.*\?\?.*\}\}|\{\{.*\|\s*async.*\}\}|<ng-container\s*\*ngIf=".*\$any\(.*\).*">)'Length of output: 1259
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Separate regex searches for Angular-related deprecations or potential issues with corrected file types # Search for deprecated decorators or lifecycle hooks rg --type ts -i 'deprecated|ngOnChanges' # Search for ViewChild with static option rg --type ts -i 'ViewChild\s*\(\s*.*\s*\)\s*\{\s*static:' # Search for ContentChild with static option rg --type ts -i 'ContentChild\s*\(\s*.*\s*\)\s*\{\s*static:' # Search for renderer2.listen usage rg --type ts -i 'renderer2\.listen' # Search for HostListener decorator rg --type ts -i '@HostListener' # Search for ViewChildren decorator rg --type ts -i '@ViewChildren' # Search for ContentChildren decorator rg --type ts -i '@ContentChildren' # Search for potential template syntax issues rg --type html '(\[\(ngModel\)\]|\{\{.*\?\?.*\}\}|\{\{.*\|\s*async.*\}\}|<ng-container\s*\*ngIf=".*\$any\(.*\).*">)'Length of output: 1677
webapp/src/app/auth/components/user-settings/user-settings.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-114: Consider full migration to typed forms for improved type safetyThe changes made to this component (updating to
UntypedFormBuilder) allow it to work with Angular 16 while maintaining its current functionality. However, these changes have introduced a reduction in type safety for your forms.To fully leverage the benefits of the Angular upgrade and improve the robustness of your application, consider the following next steps:
Migrate to typed forms throughout the component:
- Update import statements to use
FormBuilderinstead ofUntypedFormBuilder.- Modify form group definitions to use typed methods (e.g.,
fb.group<{name: string, email: string}>({...})).- Update form control access to use typed methods.
Review and update template bindings:
- Ensure that template bindings (
*ngIf,[disabled], etc.) are using the new nullish coalescing operator (??) where appropriate.Update test files:
- If there are corresponding test files for this component, make sure to update them to reflect the changes in form handling.
Consider using stricter TypeScript checks:
- Enable
strictNullChecksandstrictFunctionTypesin yourtsconfig.jsonto catch potential issues early.These steps will help maintain type safety, improve code quality, and fully utilize the features available in Angular 16.
webapp/src/app/auth/guards/no-auth.guard.ts (1)
Line range hint
12-23: Consider Refactoring to the New Functional Guard SyntaxAngular 16 introduces functional route guards, which can simplify your code and improve performance. Consider refactoring
NoAuthGuardto use the newCanActivateFnfunctional guard.Here's how you can refactor the guard:
import { inject } from '@angular/core'; import { CanActivateFn } from '@angular/router'; import { Store } from '@ngxs/store'; import { Navigate } from '@ngxs/router-plugin'; import { map } from 'rxjs/operators'; import { AuthState } from '../stores/auth.state'; export const noAuthGuard: CanActivateFn = (route, state) => { const store = inject(Store); return store.selectOnce(AuthState.isAuthenticated).pipe( map(isAuthenticated => { if (isAuthenticated) { store.dispatch(new Navigate(['/'])); return false; } return true; }) ); };Then, update your routing configuration to use the new guard:
{ path: 'login', component: LoginComponent, canActivate: [noAuthGuard], }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
- api/package.json (1 hunks)
- docs-website/package.json (2 hunks)
- lerna.json (1 hunks)
- webapp/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- webapp/angular.json (2 hunks)
- webapp/package.json (3 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/app.module.ts (1 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/components/forgot-password/forgot-password.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/components/login/login.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/components/reset-password/reset-password.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/components/signup/signup.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/components/user-settings/user-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/guards/auth.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/guards/no-auth.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/projects/components/add-api-client/add-api-client.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/projects/components/add-team-member/add-team-member.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/projects/components/edit-label/edit-label.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/projects/components/new-label/new-label.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/projects/components/new-project/new-project.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/projects/components/new-term/new-term.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/projects/components/project-settings/project-settings.component.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/shared/guards/can.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/custom_bootstrap.scss (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/polyfills.ts (0 hunks)
- webapp/src/test.ts (1 hunks)
- webapp/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- webapp/src/polyfills.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- lerna.json
- webapp/.gitignore
- webapp/src/custom_bootstrap.scss
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (37)
webapp/src/test.ts (3)
8-10: LGTM: Changes align with Angular upgradeThe modifications to the test environment setup, including the new syntax for
initTestEnvironment, are consistent with the PR objective of upgrading Angular from v12 to v16. These changes reflect the updated testing utilities in newer Angular versions.
8-10: Consider the implications ofdestroyAfterEach: falseThe addition of
teardown: { destroyAfterEach: false }to the test environment configuration can improve test performance by reducing setup/teardown overhead between tests. However, this approach may lead to state leakage between tests if not managed carefully.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior, please verify:
- All tests clean up their own state properly.
- There are no dependencies between tests that rely on a fresh environment for each test.
You can run the following command to check for potential issues:
#!/bin/bash # Search for afterEach or afterAll cleanup methods in test files rg --type typescript -g '*.spec.ts' -i '(afterEach|afterAll)' webapp/srcIf the results show limited use of cleanup methods, consider adding them where necessary to prevent state leakage.
8-10: Verify test discovery after removingrequire.contextThe removal of
require.contextlines (not visible in the provided code) simplifies the test loading process. However, it may affect how tests are discovered and loaded.Please ensure that all tests are still being properly discovered and run. You can verify this by:
- Running the test suite and checking if the number of tests executed matches the expected count.
- Reviewing the Karma configuration to ensure it's set up to find all test files correctly.
Run the following command to list all spec files in the project:
Compare this list with the tests being executed to ensure no tests are being missed.
webapp/tsconfig.json (2)
15-21: Approved: Improved formatting fortypeRootsandlibThe multi-line formatting for
typeRootsandlibarrays improves readability without changing functionality. This change is beneficial for maintainability, especially if more entries need to be added in the future.
14-14: Approved: Target update to ES2022The update of the TypeScript compilation target to ES2022 aligns well with the Angular upgrade to v16. This change allows for the use of modern JavaScript features, potentially improving code readability and performance.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that all targeted browsers support ES2022 features. You can use the following command to check your current browserslist configuration:
If needed, update the
browserslistfile or configuration inpackage.jsonto reflect your project's browser support requirements.webapp/src/app/auth/guards/auth.guard.ts (1)
2-2: Verify the impact of removing theCanActivateinterfaceThe
CanActivateinterface has been removed from theAuthGuardclass declaration. This change might be related to the Angular upgrade from v12 to v16 mentioned in the PR objectives. However, it's important to ensure that this modification doesn't break the existing routing configuration.To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, please review those files to ensure they are compatible with the updated
AuthGuardimplementation.Consider updating the routing configuration if necessary. If the
AuthGuardis still being used as a route guard, you may need to adjust how it's applied in the routing configuration to align with Angular 16's guard implementation.Also applies to: 11-11
webapp/src/app/shared/guards/can.guard.ts (1)
12-12: Verify the intentional removal ofCanActivateinterfaceThe
CanGuardclass no longer implements theCanActivateinterface. While thecanActivatemethod is still present, removing the interface implementation might affect how Angular's router interacts with this guard. This change could be related to the Angular upgrade from v12 to v16 mentioned in the PR objectives.Please confirm if this change is intentional and consistent with Angular v16 best practices. If it is, ensure that the router is correctly configured to use this guard without relying on the
CanActivateinterface.To verify if this change is consistent across the project, run the following script:
This script will help identify if the change has been consistently applied across all guard files in the project.
✅ Verification successful
Consistency in Removing
CanActivateAcross Guard Files VerifiedAll guard files have consistently removed the
implements CanActivateinterface and the corresponding import from@angular/router. This aligns with the changes outlined in the PR related to the Angular upgrade. Please ensure that the router configuration correctly utilizes these guards without relying on theCanActivateinterface.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other guard files that might still be implementing CanActivate # Test 1: Search for guard files still implementing CanActivate echo "Guard files still implementing CanActivate:" rg --type typescript "class \w+Guard implements CanActivate" -g "*guard.ts" # Test 2: Search for guard files that have removed CanActivate implementation echo "\nGuard files that have removed CanActivate implementation:" rg --type typescript "class \w+Guard\s*{" -g "*guard.ts" # Test 3: Check if CanActivate is still imported in guard files echo "\nGuard files still importing CanActivate:" rg --type typescript "import.*CanActivate.*from '@angular/router'" -g "*guard.ts"Length of output: 717
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other guard files that might still be implementing CanActivate # Test 1: Search for guard files still implementing CanActivate echo "Guard files still implementing CanActivate:" rg --type ts "class \w+Guard implements CanActivate" -g "*.ts" # Test 2: Search for guard files that have removed CanActivate implementation echo -e "\nGuard files that have removed CanActivate implementation:" rg --type ts "class \w+Guard\s*\{" -g "*.ts" # Test 3: Check if CanActivate is still imported in guard files echo -e "\nGuard files still importing CanActivate:" rg --type ts "import.*CanActivate.*from '@angular/router'" -g "*.ts"Length of output: 719
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other guard files that might still be implementing CanActivate # Test 1: Search for guard files still implementing CanActivate echo "Guard files still implementing CanActivate:" rg "class \\w+Guard implements CanActivate" -g "*.ts" # Test 2: Search for guard files that have removed CanActivate implementation echo -e "\nGuard files that have removed CanActivate implementation:" rg "class \\w+Guard\s*\{" -g "*.ts" # Test 3: Check if CanActivate is still imported in guard files echo -e "\nGuard files still importing CanActivate:" rg "import\s+.*CanActivate.*from '@angular/router'" -g "*.ts"Length of output: 692
docs-website/package.json (2)
3-3: Suggestion: Update version and review dependenciesGiven the significant upgrade from Angular v12 to v16, consider the following:
- Update the package version to reflect this major change.
- Review and update the
devDependenciessection, particularly for Angular-related packages.To help with this, you can run the following command to list all Angular-related dependencies:
Please update these dependencies to versions compatible with Angular 16.
Also applies to: 20-28
2-2: Approve package name change and verify imports.The change to a scoped package name (
@ever-traduora/docs) is a good practice. It improves organization and aligns with modern JavaScript ecosystem standards.Please verify that all import statements referencing this package have been updated accordingly throughout the project. Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old package name:
webapp/src/app/auth/components/forgot-password/forgot-password.component.ts (2)
2-2: Approved: Import statement updated for Angular v16 compatibilityThe change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis correct and aligns with Angular's migration path towards stricter form typing. This update prepares the code for future Angular versions while maintaining current functionality.
Line range hint
1-53: Overall impact: Successful migration to Angular v16 form handlingThe changes successfully update the
ForgotPasswordComponentto useUntypedFormBuilder, aligning it with Angular v16 standards. The component's functionality remains intact, with no changes to form structure, validation, or submission logic.To ensure the component still functions as expected after these changes, please verify the following:
- The form is correctly initialized with an email field.
- Email validation (required and email format) works as before.
- The form submission process functions correctly.
You can run the following script to check for any unexpected changes in the component's logic:
✅ Verification successful
Verification successful: ForgotPasswordComponent remains correctly implemented
- The form initialization with
UntypedFormBuilderis intact.- Validators for the email field (
Validators.required,Validators.email) are properly applied.- The
onSubmitmethod correctly dispatches theForgotPasswordaction.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that critical parts of the ForgotPasswordComponent haven't changed unexpectedly # Test: Check if the form initialization, validation, and submission logic are intact rg --type typescript -e "forgotPasswordForm = this\.fb\.group\(" -e "Validators\.required" -e "Validators\.email" -e "onSubmit\(\)" -A 10 webapp/src/app/auth/components/forgot-password/forgot-password.component.ts # Test: Ensure that the component still dispatches the correct action on form submission rg --type typescript -e "this\.store\.dispatch\(new ForgotPassword\(" webapp/src/app/auth/components/forgot-password/forgot-password.component.tsLength of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that critical parts of the ForgotPasswordComponent haven't changed unexpectedly # Test: Check if the form initialization, validation, and submission logic are intact rg -g "*.ts" -e "forgotPasswordForm = this\.fb\.group\(" -e "Validators\.required" -e "Validators\.email" -e "onSubmit\(\)" -A 10 webapp/src/app/auth/components/forgot-password/forgot-password.component.ts # Test: Ensure that the component still dispatches the correct action on form submission rg -g "*.ts" -e "this\.store\.dispatch\(new ForgotPassword\(" webapp/src/app/auth/components/forgot-password/forgot-password.component.tsLength of output: 933
webapp/src/app/projects/components/new-project/new-project.component.ts (3)
2-2: Update toUntypedFormBuilderis correct for Angular upgrade.The change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderin the import statement is consistent with Angular's migration guide for versions 14 and above. This change is part of the preparation for Angular's strict typing of reactive forms.
32-32: Constructor parameter type updated correctly.The constructor parameter type has been correctly updated from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilder. This change aligns with the import statement modification and ensures consistency throughout the component.
Line range hint
1-76: Verify Angular 16 compatibility for the entire component.While the changes made are correct for the Angular upgrade, it's important to ensure that the entire component is compatible with Angular 16. Some additional considerations:
- Check if
ngOnInit()method is still necessary if it's empty.- Verify if the use of
async/awaitwithstore.dispatch()is still the recommended approach in Angular 16 and NgRx (if used).- Consider using typed forms introduced in Angular 14+ for better type safety in future updates.
To help verify Angular 16 compatibility, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify potential areas that might need attention for full Angular 16 compatibility.
webapp/src/app/auth/components/signup/signup.component.ts (1)
2-2: Approved: Import statement updated for Angular upgradeThe change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis consistent with Angular's migration path for forms in newer versions. This modification is part of the upgrade process from Angular v12 to v16.While this change doesn't affect the component's functionality, it may impact type checking for form controls. In future updates, consider migrating to the new typed forms API introduced in Angular 14+ for improved type safety.
webapp/src/app/projects/components/new-term/new-term.component.ts (2)
2-2: Correct import change for Angular upgrade.The change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis correct and necessary for the Angular upgrade from v12 to v16. This change maintains backwards compatibility with existing form structures.
36-36: Consistent constructor parameter update.The change of the constructor parameter type from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis correct and consistent with the import statement change. This ensures proper dependency injection with the newUntypedFormBuilder.webapp/src/app/auth/components/reset-password/reset-password.component.ts (2)
33-33: Constructor parameter updated to useUntypedFormBuilder.The constructor parameter has been correctly updated to use
UntypedFormBuilder. This change is consistent with the import statement update and follows the Angular upgrade path.
2-2: Update toUntypedFormBuilderis consistent with Angular upgrade.The change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis in line with Angular's migration strategy when upgrading to newer versions. This change helps maintain backwards compatibility while allowing for future improvements in form typing.To ensure this change is consistent across the project, let's verify the usage:
✅ Verification successful
All usages of
FormBuilderhave been successfully replaced withUntypedFormBuilder.The codebase no longer contains any instances of
FormBuilderimports or constructor usages, ensuring consistency with Angular's upgrade best practices.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of FormBuilder # Expected: No occurrences of FormBuilder import or usage echo "Checking for FormBuilder imports:" rg --type typescript "import.*FormBuilder.*from '@angular/forms'" -g '!*.spec.ts' echo "Checking for FormBuilder usage in constructors:" rg --type typescript "constructor.*private.*fb:.*FormBuilder" -g '!*.spec.ts'Length of output: 421
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of FormBuilder # Expected: No occurrences of FormBuilder import or usage echo "Checking for FormBuilder imports:" rg "import.*FormBuilder.*from '@angular/forms'" -g '*.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts' echo "Checking for FormBuilder usage in constructors:" rg "constructor.*private.*fb:.*FormBuilder" -g '*.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts'Length of output: 1967
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Accurately check for any remaining usage of FormBuilder # Expected: No occurrences of FormBuilder import or usage, excluding UntypedFormBuilder echo "Checking for FormBuilder imports (excluding UntypedFormBuilder):" rg "\bFormBuilder\b" -g '*.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts' --ignore 'UntypedFormBuilder' echo "Checking for FormBuilder usage in constructors (excluding UntypedFormBuilder):" rg "\bFormBuilder\b" -g '*.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts' --ignore 'UntypedFormBuilder'Length of output: 577
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Accurately check for any remaining usage of FormBuilder excluding UntypedFormBuilder # Expected: No occurrences of FormBuilder import or usage, excluding UntypedFormBuilder echo "Checking for FormBuilder imports (excluding UntypedFormBuilder):" rg "\bFormBuilder\b" -g '*.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts' echo "Checking for FormBuilder usage in constructors (excluding UntypedFormBuilder):" rg "\bFormBuilder\b" -g '*.ts' -g '!*.spec.ts'Length of output: 403
webapp/src/app/projects/components/add-team-member/add-team-member.component.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly for Angular upgrade.The change from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderis in line with Angular's migration guide for versions 14 and above. This update maintains backwards compatibility with the previous behavior ofFormBuilder, which is essential during the upgrade process from Angular v12 to v16.webapp/src/app/projects/components/new-label/new-label.component.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-43: Overall impact ofUntypedFormBuilderchangesThe changes to use
UntypedFormBuilderare necessary for the Angular upgrade from v12 to v16 and don't introduce any functional changes to the component. The component should continue to work as before, but with slightly reduced type safety for form controls.To ensure consistency across the application, it's important to verify that similar changes have been made in other components using forms. Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the typed
FormBuilder:If the script returns any results, those files may need similar updates to use
UntypedFormBuilder.✅ Verification successful
✅ Typed FormBuilder Usage Successfully Updated
All instances of the typed
FormBuilderhave been successfully replaced withUntypedFormBuilderacross the codebase. No remaining usages of the typedFormBuilderwere found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usage of typed FormBuilder # Test: Search for FormBuilder import and usage echo "Searching for FormBuilder imports:" rg --type typescript "import.*FormBuilder.*from '@angular/forms'" ./src echo "Searching for FormBuilder constructor injections:" rg --type typescript "constructor.*private.*fb:.*FormBuilder" ./srcLength of output: 407
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usage of typed FormBuilder using explicit file extensions # Search for FormBuilder imports in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for FormBuilder imports in .ts and .tsx files:" rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' "import.*FormBuilder.*from '@angular/forms'" ./src # Search for FormBuilder constructor injections in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for FormBuilder constructor injections in .ts and .tsx files:" rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' "constructor.*private.*fb:.*FormBuilder" ./srcLength of output: 539
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usage of typed FormBuilder across the entire repository # Search for FormBuilder imports in all .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for FormBuilder imports in all .ts and .tsx files:" rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' "import.*FormBuilder.*from '@angular/forms'" # Search for FormBuilder constructor injections in all .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for FormBuilder constructor injections in all .ts and .tsx files:" rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' "constructor.*private.*fb:.*FormBuilder"Length of output: 2083
webapp/src/app/projects/components/edit-label/edit-label.component.ts (2)
38-38: Approved: Constructor parameter updated consistently with import change.The constructor parameter type has been correctly updated from
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilder, maintaining consistency with the import statement change. This modification ensures that the component continues to function as expected with the Angular v16 upgrade.The rest of the component's logic using
this.fbremains unchanged, which is correct asUntypedFormBuildermaintains the same API asFormBuilder.
Line range hint
1-105: Verify: Component consistency and future improvements.The changes made to use
UntypedFormBuilderare consistent throughout the component, and no other modifications were necessary. The existing form logic continues to work as expected withUntypedFormBuilder.However, for future improvements:
- Consider migrating to the new typed forms API introduced in Angular v14+. This would provide better type safety and catch potential errors at compile-time.
- Update the
formproperty to useUntypedFormGroupfor consistency withUntypedFormBuilder.Example of future typed forms usage:
form = this.fb.group({ value: this.fb.control('', { validators: [Validators.required, Validators.maxLength(30), Validators.pattern('.*[^ ].*')], nonNullable: true, }), color: this.fb.control('', { validators: [Validators.required, Validators.pattern('^#[A-Fa-f0-9]{6}$')], nonNullable: true, }), });This change would require updating
FormBuilderback to the typed version and adjusting the form control access methods.webapp/package.json (7)
2-2: Approved: Package name updated to use scoped formatThe change from "ever-traduora-webapp" to "@ever-traduora/webapp" adopts a scoped package naming convention. This is a good practice for organizing related packages and aligns with modern npm conventions.
55-58: Approved: rxjs, tslib, and zone.js updatedThe updates to rxjs (7.3.0 to 7.8.1), tslib (2.3.1 to 2.6.3), and zone.js (0.11.4 to 0.13.3) are appropriate and align with the Angular upgrade. These changes should improve performance and fix potential bugs.
Action item:
- Review the changelogs for these packages to be aware of any new features or deprecations that might affect the project.
61-64: Approved: Dev dependencies updated and new ones addedThe updates and additions to the dev dependencies are appropriate:
- Angular dev tools have been updated to match the new Angular version (lines 61-64).
- New dev dependencies added:
- @types/popper.js for TypeScript support of @popperjs/core (line 71).
- cross-env for setting environment variables across platforms (line 73).
- rimraf, ts-node, and typescript have been updated to newer versions (lines 82, 83, 85).
These changes should improve the development experience and align with the project's upgrade goals.
Action items:
- Review the impact of the TypeScript update (4.2.3 to 4.9.5) on the project, as it may introduce new language features or stricter type checking.
- Ensure that the build and test processes work correctly with the updated dev dependencies.
To check for any potential issues with the TypeScript update, run:
#!/bin/bash # Run TypeScript compiler in noEmit mode to check for new errors npx tsc --noEmit # Check for usage of new TypeScript features rg -i 'satisfies|in keyof|as const' --type tsAlso applies to: 71-73, 82-83, 85-85
40-43: Approved: ng-bootstrap and NGXS packages updatedThe updates to ng-bootstrap (10.0.0 to 15.1.2) and NGXS packages (3.7.2 to 3.8.2) are significant changes that may introduce breaking changes or new features.
Action items:
- Review the changelogs for ng-bootstrap and NGXS to understand the changes between versions.
- Check for any deprecated APIs or breaking changes that might affect the project.
- Update the codebase to leverage new features or adapt to breaking changes.
- Ensure thorough testing of components using ng-bootstrap and NGXS state management.
To verify the impact of these updates, run the following commands:
#!/bin/bash # Check for ng-bootstrap usage that might need updates rg -i 'ngb' --type ts # Look for NGXS store definitions that might need updates ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern '@State<$_>({ $$$ })'
44-45:⚠️ Potential issueReview needed: New dependencies added
The addition of
@popperjs/core(line 44) is approved as it's likely a peer dependency for ng-bootstrap.The addition of
bcrypt(line 45) in a frontend package is unusual. Typically, password hashing should be done on the server-side. Please clarify the intended use of bcrypt in the frontend.The
cryptodependency (line 48) is a Node.js built-in module and shouldn't be necessary as a dependency in a browser environment. Consider removing this dependency unless there's a specific use case that requires it.Recommended actions:
- Remove the
cryptodependency unless there's a justified need for it in the frontend.- Reconsider the use of
bcryptin the frontend and potentially move password hashing operations to the backend if that's the intended use.To check for any usage of these packages, run:
#!/bin/bash # Check for bcrypt usage rg 'bcrypt' --type ts # Check for crypto usage rg 'crypto' --type tsAlso applies to: 48-48
Line range hint
20-22: Approved: Scripts updated and Node.js version requirement increasedThe following changes have been made to scripts and engine requirements:
- A new script using cross-env has been added for the 'ng' command (line 20), improving cross-platform compatibility.
- The 'postinstall' script now uses 'ngcc' (line 22), which is related to the Angular Ivy compiler.
- The Node.js engine requirement has been updated to ">=18.0.0" (line 88).
These changes are appropriate and align with the project's upgrade goals.
Action items:
- Update CI/CD pipelines to use Node.js version 18 or higher.
- Update development setup instructions to reflect the new Node.js version requirement.
- Ensure all team members update their local development environments to Node.js 18+.
- Verify that the deployment environments support Node.js 18+.
To verify the Node.js version in your CI/CD pipeline, add the following command to your CI script:
Also applies to: 88-89
31-39: Approved: Angular packages updated to v16.2.12The upgrade from Angular 12.2.5 to 16.2.12 is a significant change that aligns with the PR's main objective. This major version upgrade may introduce breaking changes and require code modifications throughout the project.
Ensure that:
- All deprecated APIs have been updated.
- The entire codebase has been reviewed and updated for Angular 16 compatibility.
- Comprehensive testing has been performed to catch any regression issues.
To verify the impact of this upgrade, please run the following commands:
webapp/src/app/app.module.ts (1)
65-65: Improved routing configurationThe addition of
scrollPositionRestoration: 'enabled'is a positive change. This option ensures that the scroll position is restored when navigating between routes, which enhances the user experience.Additionally, although not visible in the provided code, the removal of
relativeLinkResolution: 'legacy'(as mentioned in the AI summary) is consistent with upgrading to Angular 16. This option was deprecated in Angular 11 and removed in Angular 13, so its removal is appropriate for this upgrade.Both changes align well with the PR objectives of upgrading Angular from v12 to v16.
webapp/angular.json (3)
25-28: Approval: Addition of "file-saver" to allowedCommonJsDependenciesThe addition of "file-saver" to the
allowedCommonJsDependenciesarray is appropriate. This change prevents build warnings related to CommonJS module usage, which is more strictly monitored in newer Angular versions. It's a necessary step when using CommonJS libraries like "file-saver" in an Angular application.
Line range hint
1-104: Clarify the new linting strategyThe removal of
lintconfigurations for bothtraduora-webappandtraduora-webapp-e2eprojects fromangular.jsonsuggests a change in the linting strategy. Could you please clarify:
- How is linting now being performed in the project?
- If there's a new linting process, has it been documented for the development team?
Ensuring proper linting is crucial for maintaining code quality. If the linting process has changed, it would be beneficial to update the project documentation to reflect this change.
Line range hint
1-104: Verify impact of removing defaultProjectThe removal of the
defaultProjectproperty from the root ofangular.jsonmay impact Angular CLI commands that rely on a default project context. To ensure smooth operation:
- Verify that any build, test, or deployment scripts that use Angular CLI commands without explicitly specifying a project still work as expected.
- Update team documentation to note that project names may need to be explicitly specified in Angular CLI commands going forward.
- Consider adding a note in the README or developer documentation about this change to prevent confusion for developers used to the old configuration.
To help verify the impact, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential places where the removal of
defaultProjectmight cause issues.✅ Verification successful
Verified removal of
defaultProjectThe removal of the
defaultProjectproperty fromangular.jsondoes not affect any Angular CLI commands in the existing build, test, or deployment scripts. Nongcommands were found that rely on a default project context without explicitly specifying the project. Therefore, the change is safe and does not require further action.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of ng commands without project specification in scripts # Look for ng commands in package.json scripts echo "Checking package.json scripts:" jq '.scripts | to_entries[] | select(.value | contains("ng ") and (contains("traduora-webapp") | not))' package.json # Look for ng commands in any .sh files echo "Checking .sh files:" rg 'ng (?!.*traduora-webapp)' -g '*.sh'Length of output: 511
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of ng commands without project specification in scripts # Look for ng commands in package.json scripts echo "Checking package.json scripts:" jq '.scripts | to_entries[] | select(.value | contains("ng ") and (contains("traduora-webapp") | not))' package.json # Look for ng commands in any .sh files without 'traduora-webapp' echo "Checking .sh files:" rg 'ng ' -g '*.sh' | grep -v 'traduora-webapp'Length of output: 2162
api/package.json (3)
3-18: File consistency maintained after package name change.The rest of the package.json file, including version number, license, repository URL, and author information, remains consistent with the package name change. No other modifications were necessary.
2-2: Approve package name change to scoped naming convention.The change from "ever-traduora-api" to "@ever-traduora/api" adopts a scoped package naming convention, which is a good practice for organizing related packages and avoiding naming conflicts.
Please ensure that all import statements and references to this package in other parts of the project are updated accordingly. Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old package name:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to the old package name rg "ever-traduora-api" --type ts --type js --type json
31-73: NestJS dependencies are up-to-date; verify Angular frontend dependencies.The NestJS packages are at version ^10.3.9, which is recent and likely compatible with Angular 16. However, this package.json file appears to be for the API part of the project and doesn't contain direct Angular dependencies.
Please ensure that the Angular dependencies are updated to version 16 in the frontend package.json file. You can use the following script to check the Angular core version in the project:
| @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ | |||
| "docusaurus": "^1.14.7" | |||
| }, | |||
| "dependencies": { | |||
| "bootstrap": "^5.1.1", | |||
| "bootstrap": "^4.6.2", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Question: Why downgrade Bootstrap?
The change from Bootstrap 5.1.1 to 4.6.2 is a downgrade, which seems inconsistent with the PR objective of upgrading Angular. Newer Angular versions typically work better with newer Bootstrap versions.
Please clarify the reasoning behind this downgrade. Consider the following:
- Are there specific compatibility issues with Bootstrap 5.x and Angular 16?
- Does this downgrade impact any existing UI components or layouts?
- Have you tested the application thoroughly with this older Bootstrap version to ensure no regressions?
If there's no compelling reason for the downgrade, consider reverting to Bootstrap 5.x or even upgrading to the latest compatible version.
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| import { Component, OnDestroy, OnInit } from '@angular/core'; | |||
| import { FormBuilder, Validators } from '@angular/forms'; | |||
| import { UntypedFormBuilder, Validators } from '@angular/forms'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider migrating to typed forms for better type safety
The change from FormBuilder to UntypedFormBuilder is part of the Angular upgrade process. While this change allows the code to work with newer Angular versions, it reduces type safety for your forms.
Consider migrating to the new typed forms API introduced in Angular 14+ for improved type safety and better IDE support. This would involve:
- Changing the import back to
FormBuilder. - Updating form definitions to use typed methods like
this.fb.group<{name: string, email: string}>({...}). - Updating form control access to use the new typed methods.
This migration will provide better type checking and autocompletion for your form controls.
| @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ export class UserSettingsComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy { | |||
| private sub: Subscription; | |||
|
|
|||
| constructor( | |||
| private fb: FormBuilder, | |||
| private fb: UntypedFormBuilder, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update constructor parameter to use typed FormBuilder
The constructor parameter has been changed to use UntypedFormBuilder. This change corresponds to the import statement modification and is part of the Angular upgrade process.
If you decide to migrate to typed forms as suggested earlier, update this line to:
private fb: FormBuilder,This change, along with updating the import statement and form definitions, will restore type safety to your forms while maintaining compatibility with Angular 16.
| @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import { AuthState } from '../stores/auth.state'; | |||
| @Injectable({ | |||
| providedIn: 'root', | |||
| }) | |||
| export class NoAuthGuard implements CanActivate { | |||
| export class NoAuthGuard { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
NoAuthGuard Should Implement CanActivate Interface
By removing implements CanActivate from the NoAuthGuard class, the Angular Router may not recognize this guard as a valid CanActivate guard. This could result in the guard not being invoked when expected, leading to potential security issues.
Apply this diff to restore implements CanActivate:
-export class NoAuthGuard {
+export class NoAuthGuard implements CanActivate {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export class NoAuthGuard { | |
| export class NoAuthGuard implements CanActivate { |
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| import { Injectable } from '@angular/core'; | |||
| import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, CanActivate, RouterStateSnapshot } from '@angular/router'; | |||
| import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouterStateSnapshot } from '@angular/router'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing Import for CanActivate Interface
Since NoAuthGuard should implement the CanActivate interface, you need to import CanActivate from @angular/router.
Apply this diff to restore the import:
import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';
-import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouterStateSnapshot } from '@angular/router';
+import { CanActivate, ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouterStateSnapshot } from '@angular/router';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouterStateSnapshot } from '@angular/router'; | |
| import { Injectable } from '@angular/core'; | |
| import { CanActivate, ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouterStateSnapshot } from '@angular/router'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
webapp/src/styles.scss (2)
11-17: Improved readability of font-family declarationThe restructuring of the font-family declaration for the universal selector (*) enhances code readability. Breaking the long list of font families into multiple lines is a good practice for maintaining clean and easily scannable CSS/SCSS code.
Consider adding a trailing comma after 'sans-serif' for consistency with modern CSS practices and to make future additions easier.
61-67: Consistent improvement in font-family declaration readabilityThe restructuring of the font-family declaration for the .font-serif class mirrors the changes made to the universal selector, maintaining consistency throughout the stylesheet. This change enhances code readability without altering functionality.
As with the previous comment, consider adding a trailing comma after 'sans-serif' for consistency with modern CSS practices and to facilitate future additions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- webapp/angular.json (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/guards/auth.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/auth/guards/no-auth.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/shared/components/app-bar/app-bar.component.css (1 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/shared/components/search/search.component.css (1 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/shared/components/select-label/select-label.component.css (1 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/shared/components/select-locale/select-locale.component.css (1 hunks)
- webapp/src/app/shared/guards/can.guard.ts (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/custom_bootstrap.scss (1 hunks)
- webapp/src/styles.scss (2 hunks)
- webapp/src/test.ts (1 hunks)
- webapp/src/tsconfig.app.json (1 hunks)
- webapp/src/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
- webapp/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- webapp/src/app/shared/components/app-bar/app-bar.component.css
- webapp/src/app/shared/components/search/search.component.css
- webapp/src/app/shared/components/select-label/select-label.component.css
- webapp/src/app/shared/components/select-locale/select-locale.component.css
- webapp/src/tsconfig.app.json
- webapp/src/tsconfig.spec.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- webapp/angular.json
- webapp/src/app/auth/guards/auth.guard.ts
- webapp/src/app/shared/guards/can.guard.ts
- webapp/src/custom_bootstrap.scss
- webapp/src/test.ts
- webapp/tsconfig.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
webapp/src/app/auth/guards/no-auth.guard.ts (2)
2-2:⚠️ Potential issueRestore the
CanActivateimport to maintain guard functionality.The removal of the
CanActivateimport, combined with the changes in the class declaration, may affect how Angular recognizes and uses this guard. To ensure proper functionality and type checking, it's recommended to keep theCanActivateimport.Apply this diff to restore the import:
-import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouterStateSnapshot } from '@angular/router'; +import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouterStateSnapshot, CanActivate } from '@angular/router';
12-12:⚠️ Potential issueRestore
implements CanActivateto ensure proper guard functionality.Removing
implements CanActivatefrom the class declaration may affect how Angular recognizes and uses this guard in the routing configuration. Although thecanActivatemethod is still present, without explicitly implementing the interface, there's no guarantee that it follows the correct signature, which could lead to runtime errors.Apply this diff to restore the interface implementation:
-export class NoAuthGuard { +export class NoAuthGuard implements CanActivate {This change, combined with restoring the
CanActivateimport, will ensure that the guard is properly recognized by Angular and maintains type safety.webapp/src/styles.scss (1)
Line range hint
1-167: Overall assessment: Improved code formatting without functional changesThe changes in this file are focused on improving the readability of font-family declarations. These modifications:
- Enhance code maintainability by making long declarations more readable.
- Maintain consistency across different selectors.
- Do not introduce any functional changes or potential issues.
These changes align with best practices for CSS/SCSS formatting and contribute to a more maintainable codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
webapp/package.json (1)
61-64: Approve dev dependency updates and additions.The updates to Angular dev tools, rimraf, ts-node, and typescript, as well as the additions of @types/popper.js and cross-env, are appropriate and align with the project's needs.
Consider updating the start script to use cross-env for consistency:
- "start": "yarn ng serve --open", + "start": "cross-env NODE_OPTIONS=--openssl-legacy-provider yarn ng serve --open",This ensures consistent behavior across different platforms.
Also applies to: 71-71, 73-73, 82-83, 85-85
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- docs-website/package.json (1 hunks)
- webapp/package.json (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docs-website/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
webapp/package.json (5)
2-2: Approve package name change to scoped format.The change from "ever-traduora-webapp" to "@ever-traduora/webapp" aligns with modern npm package naming conventions. This scoped package format improves organization and reduces naming conflicts.
55-55: Approve updates to rxjs, tslib, and zone.js.The updates to rxjs (7.8.1), tslib (2.6.3), and zone.js (0.13.3) are consistent with the Angular upgrade. These changes should improve performance and ensure compatibility with the new Angular version.
Also applies to: 57-58
88-88: Approve Node.js version requirement.Setting the required Node.js version to ">=18.0.0" is appropriate given the major upgrades in the project dependencies. This ensures compatibility with the latest LTS version of Node.js and aligns with best practices for maintaining up-to-date development environments.
31-39: Verify Angular migration steps for major version upgrade.The upgrade from Angular 12.2.5 to 16.2.12 is a significant change that likely includes important improvements and features. However, such a major upgrade often requires following specific migration steps.
Please ensure that all necessary migration steps have been followed. You can verify this by running:
40-43: Verify compatibility with updated ng-bootstrap and NGXS versions.The updates to ng-bootstrap (10.0.0 to 15.1.2) and NGXS packages (to 3.8.2) are significant. These changes may introduce breaking changes or require code adjustments.
Please review the changelogs for these packages and ensure that any necessary code changes have been made. You can check for potential issues by running:
|
Report too large to display inline |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- docs-website/package.json (2 hunks)
- webapp/package.json (4 hunks)
- webapp/src/custom_bootstrap.scss (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- docs-website/package.json
- webapp/src/custom_bootstrap.scss
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
webapp/package.json (6)
2-2: LGTM: Package name updated to use scoped format.The change to "@ever-traduora/webapp" aligns with modern npm package naming conventions and improves package organization.
21-21: Verify the need for --openssl-legacy-provider.The addition of cross-env improves cross-platform compatibility. However, the use of --openssl-legacy-provider suggests potential compatibility issues with newer Node.js versions.
Please confirm if this flag is necessary for your current Node.js version and consider planning for updates to remove reliance on legacy crypto providers in the future.
40-43: LGTM: Dependencies updated for Angular 16 compatibility.The updates to @ng-bootstrap, @ngxs packages, rxjs, tslib, and zone.js are likely necessary for compatibility with Angular 16.
Please ensure that these updated packages are compatible with your application by running your test suite and manually testing key functionalities.
Also applies to: 55-55, 57-58
61-64: LGTM: DevDependencies updated appropriately.The updates to Angular CLI and related packages, as well as the addition of @types/popper.js and cross-env, align well with the main dependency changes. The updates to rimraf, ts-node, and typescript keep the development tools current.
Also applies to: 71-71, 73-73, 82-83, 85-85
88-88: LGTM: Node.js version requirement updated.Updating the required Node.js version to ">=18.0.0" aligns well with the Angular upgrade and ensures compatibility with modern features.
31-39: LGTM: Angular packages updated to v16.2.12.The consistent update of all Angular packages to version 16.2.12 is good. This major version upgrade likely includes significant improvements and changes.
Ensure that you've followed the Angular upgrade guide and thoroughly tested the application after this major version upgrade. Run the following command to check for any remaining deprecations or breaking changes:
Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following
Contributor license agreement
For us it's important to have the agreement of our contributors to use their work, whether it be code or documentation. Therefore, we are asking all contributors to sign a contributor license agreement (CLA) as commonly accepted in most open source projects. Just open the pull request and our CLA bot will prompt you briefly.
Please check our contribution guidelines for some help in the process.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
.gitignoreto include Angular cache directory.Refactor
FormBuildertoUntypedFormBuilderacross multiple components for improved flexibility.Chores