[Feat] Mentions and Subscription APIs #8554
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/core/src/mention/mention.controller.ts (2)
1-5: Add API documentation and permission types.Consider enhancing the controller's documentation and type safety:
- Add OpenAPI/Swagger decorators for API documentation
- Define explicit permission types for the PermissionGuard
import { Controller, UseGuards } from '@nestjs/common'; +import { ApiTags, ApiOperation } from '@nestjs/swagger'; import { PermissionGuard, TenantPermissionGuard } from '../shared/guards'; +import { Permissions } from '../shared/decorators'; +import { PermissionsEnum } from '../shared/enums'; import { CrudController } from './../core/crud'; import { Mention } from './mention.entity'; import { MentionService } from './mention.service';
9-13: Consider adding custom endpoints and validation.The current implementation only provides basic CRUD operations. Consider enhancing it with:
- Custom endpoints for specific mention-related operations (e.g., getMentionsByUser, getMentionsByEntity)
- Input validation using DTOs
- Response transformation using interceptors
Example implementation:
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Get mentions by user' }) @Get('user/:userId') async getMentionsByUser( @Param('userId') userId: string, @Query() filter: MentionFilterDTO ): Promise<IPagination<Mention>> { return this.mentionService.getMentionsByUser(userId, filter); }packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/mention.handler.ts (1)
17-21: Consider implementing idempotency for event handling.In a distributed system, the same mention event might be processed multiple times. Consider implementing idempotency by:
- Adding a unique identifier to the mention event
- Checking for existing mentions before creation
- Using database transactions to ensure atomic operations
Example approach:
interface IMentionEvent { eventId: string; // Unique identifier for the event input: IMentionCreateInput; } async handle(event: MentionEvent): Promise<IMention> { try { // Check if event was already processed const existingMention = await this.mentionService.findByEventId(event.eventId); if (existingMention) { return existingMention; } // Process the event within a transaction return await this.mentionService.createWithEventId(event.eventId, event.input); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to handle mention event:', error); throw error; } }packages/core/src/mention/mention.module.ts (1)
20-20: Assess the necessity of exporting both ORM modules and the repositoryThe module exports both
TypeOrmModuleandMikroOrmModule, along withTypeOrmMentionRepository. If other modules do not require direct access to these ORM modules or the repository, consider limiting the exports to only what is necessary. This can help encapsulate the module's internal implementations and promote cleaner module interfaces.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/mention.handler.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/events/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/events/mention.event.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.controller.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.module.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/index.ts
- packages/core/src/mention/events/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/core/src/mention/events/mention.event.ts (1)
1-6: LGTM! Implementation follows NestJS CQRS patterns.
The event class is correctly implemented with proper immutability and type safety.
packages/core/src/mention/mention.controller.ts (1)
1-13: Verify integration with related components.
Let's ensure proper integration with the broader mentions feature.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the mentions feature integration.
Integration with mentions feature is properly implemented
The mentions feature is well-integrated with all necessary components:
- The controller extends CrudController and is properly guarded
- MentionModule is correctly registered in app.module.ts
- Event handling is implemented via MentionEventHandler
- MentionService includes proper error handling and event publishing
- Entity is well-defined with proper relations and validations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent error handling and related components
# Find all mention-related files
echo "Finding mention-related files..."
fd -e ts mention
# Check for error handling patterns
echo "Checking error handling patterns..."
rg -A 2 "throw new" --type ts
# Verify module registration
echo "Verifying module registration..."
rg -l "MentionController" --type ts
Length of output: 101369
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check mention module registration and related components
# Check mention module registration
echo "Checking mention module registration..."
rg -A 5 "MentionModule" --type ts
# Check mention event handlers
echo "Checking mention event handlers..."
cat packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/mention.handler.ts
# Check mention service implementation
echo "Checking mention service implementation..."
cat packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts
# Check mention entity
echo "Checking mention entity..."
cat packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts
Length of output: 6939
packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/mention.handler.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports follow good practices with external dependencies first, followed by internal ones.
6-7: LGTM! Class declaration follows NestJS CQRS patterns.
The class is properly decorated and implements the correct interface for type safety.
packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts (2)
1-19: LGTM! Well-structured service initialization
The service is properly set up with dependency injection, repository initialization, and event bus integration. The dual repository pattern (TypeORM and MikroORM) is correctly implemented.
13-19: Verify dual ORM implementation pattern
The service implements both TypeORM and MikroORM repositories. Let's verify this is consistent with the codebase's architecture.
✅ Verification successful
Dual ORM pattern is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that the dual ORM pattern is a core architectural design:
- The pattern is implemented in the base
TenantAwareCrudServiceclass - Over 100 services extend this base class and inherit the dual ORM functionality
- The pattern is consistently used across different domains (users, organizations, time tracking, etc.)
- Both TypeORM and MikroORM repositories are injected through the constructor chain from child services up to the base class
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other services follow the same dual ORM pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'class $SERVICE extends TenantAwareCrudService {
constructor(
readonly typeOrm$_: $_,
readonly mikroOrm$_: $_,
$$$
) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find services with both TypeORM and MikroORM repositories
# First, find all service files
echo "=== Service Files ==="
fd "service.ts$"
# Then search for TypeORM and MikroORM repository patterns in these services
echo -e "\n=== Services with Repository Patterns ==="
rg -l "typeOrm.*Repository|mikroOrm.*Repository" $(fd "service.ts$")
# Get more context around constructor patterns
echo -e "\n=== Constructor Patterns ==="
rg -A 5 "constructor.*typeOrm.*Repository.*mikroOrm.*Repository" $(fd "service.ts$")
Length of output: 108041
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the base class and inheritance pattern
# First, check the TenantAwareCrudService implementation
echo "=== TenantAwareCrudService Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "export abstract class TenantAwareCrudService" packages/core/src/core/crud/tenant-aware-crud.service.ts
# Then check if other services follow similar pattern
echo -e "\n=== Services extending TenantAwareCrudService ==="
rg "extends TenantAwareCrudService" -l
# Finally check for any other dual ORM patterns
echo -e "\n=== Other Dual ORM Patterns ==="
rg "constructor.*\(.*typeOrm.*,.*mikroOrm.*\)" -A 5
Length of output: 10077
packages/core/src/mention/mention.module.ts (1)
10-10: Verify the consistency of repository implementations
TypeOrmMentionRepository is provided and exported, but since MikroOrmModule is also imported for the Mention entity, ensure that there's no mismatch between the ORM used in your repository and the one registered in the module. If TypeOrmMentionRepository is intended to work with TypeORM, consider whether the MikroOrmModule import is necessary.
Run the following script to check for existing repositories and their corresponding ORMs:
Also applies to: 18-18
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/index.ts (1)
1-3: Add documentation for command handlers.The implementation correctly follows CQRS patterns and NestJS conventions. Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment to document the purpose of these command handlers and their role in subscription management.
+/** + * Command handlers for managing subscription-related operations. + * Currently includes handlers for subscription creation. + */ export const CommandHandlers = [SubscriptionCreateHandler];packages/core/src/subscription/events/subscription.create.event.ts (1)
1-6: Clean implementation following CQRS event pattern!The event class is well-structured, properly implements the IEvent interface, and maintains immutability through the readonly modifier.
Consider these best practices for event-driven architectures:
- Ensure events are versioned if they might evolve over time
- Consider adding metadata like timestamp or correlation ID for tracing
- Keep events immutable and focused on representing "facts that occurred"
Example enhancement:
export class CreateSubscriptionEvent implements IEvent { - constructor(public readonly input: ISubscriptionCreateInput) {} + public readonly timestamp: Date; + + constructor( + public readonly input: ISubscriptionCreateInput, + public readonly correlationId?: string + ) { + this.timestamp = new Date(); + } }packages/core/src/subscription/repository/mikro-orm-subscription.repository.ts (1)
1-4: Implementation looks good but consider adding type safetyThe repository implementation is clean and follows the repository pattern. However, consider adding TypeScript decorators for better type safety and ORM integration.
+import { Repository } from '@mikro-orm/core'; + +@Repository(Subscription) export class MikroOrmSubscriptionRepository extends MikroOrmBaseEntityRepository<Subscription> {}packages/core/src/subscription/dto/subscription-find-input.dto.ts (1)
1-5: Add API documentation for better OpenAPI specification.While the basic structure is correct, consider enhancing it with Swagger decorators for better API documentation.
Consider adding these improvements:
import { PartialType } from '@nestjs/swagger'; import { ISubscriptionFindInput } from '@gauzy/contracts'; import { Subscription } from '../subscription.entity'; +import { ApiPropertyOptional } from '@nestjs/swagger'; + +/** + * DTO for finding subscriptions with optional search criteria + */ +@ApiTags('Subscription') export class SubscriptionFindInputDTO extends PartialType(Subscription) implements ISubscriptionFindInput {}packages/core/src/subscription/commands/subscription.create.command.ts (1)
4-8: Consider adding JSDoc documentationAdding JSDoc documentation would improve API documentation and developer experience.
Example improvement:
+/** + * Command for creating a new subscription + * @class SubscriptionCreateCommand + * @implements {ICommand} + */ export class SubscriptionCreateCommand implements ICommand { static readonly type = '[Subscription] Create'; + /** + * @param {ISubscriptionCreateInput} input - The subscription creation data + */ constructor(public readonly input: ISubscriptionCreateInput) {} }packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts (2)
Line range hint
11-11: Consider adding documentation for IMentionCreateInputWhile the interface is well-designed using TypeScript's Omit utility, it would be helpful to add JSDoc comments explaining why the 'mentionBy' property is omitted from the create input interface.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Interface for creating a new mention. + * Omits 'mentionBy' as it's set automatically by the system based on the authenticated user. + */ export interface IMentionCreateInput extends Omit<IMention, 'mentionBy'> {}
Removing
entityIdandentityproperties would cause breaking changesThe verification shows that
entityIdandentityproperties are actively used in the codebase:
- These fields are required in the
Mentionentity implementation with proper decorators and validation- The properties are used in database migrations with indexes
- The mention service uses these fields for creating subscriptions and handling mentions
- Both fields are marked as
@IsNotEmpty()and are essential for the entity's functionality🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
4-9: Interface structure looks good, but verify impact of removed propertiesThe interface is well-structured with proper typing and relationship handling. The addition of
IBasePerEntityTypeprovides better standardization for entity type handling.Let's verify the impact of removing
entityIdandentityproperties:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of the removed properties to ensure no breaking changes echo "Searching for entityId usage in mentions..." rg "mention.*entityId" --type ts echo "Searching for entity property usage in mentions..." rg "mention.*entity[^T]" --type ts # Search for any existing mentions implementation echo "Searching for Mention entity implementations..." rg "class.*Mention.*implements.*IMention" --type tsLength of output: 13385
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual implementation of the Mention entity and its usage echo "Checking Mention entity implementation..." cat packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts echo -e "\nChecking mention service implementation..." cat packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.tsLength of output: 5468
packages/core/src/subscription/repository/type-orm-subscription.repository.ts (1)
7-11: Consider defining a repository interface for better maintainability.To improve maintainability and make the contract more explicit, consider defining an interface that declares all subscription-specific operations. This would make it easier to:
- Document expected repository behavior
- Implement different repository implementations (e.g., for testing)
- Ensure consistent repository usage across the application
Example interface definition:
interface ISubscriptionRepository { // Define subscription-specific operations here // Example methods: findActiveSubscriptions(userId: string): Promise<Subscription[]>; cancelSubscription(subscriptionId: string): Promise<void>; // ... other subscription-specific methods } @Injectable() export class TypeOrmSubscriptionRepository extends Repository<Subscription> implements ISubscriptionRepository { // ... existing implementation }packages/core/src/subscription/dto/create-subscription.dto.ts (1)
10-10: Consider documenting inherited propertiesThe DTO combines properties from multiple sources using
IntersectionType. Consider adding property documentation using@ApiPropertydecorators for better API documentation, even for inherited properties.packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/subscription.create.handler.ts (1)
10-14: Consider adding error handling and loggingThe execute method could benefit from:
- Error handling for potential service failures
- Input validation
- Logging for debugging and monitoring
Here's a suggested improvement:
public async execute(command: SubscriptionCreateCommand): Promise<ISubscription> { const { input } = command; - - return await this.subscriptionService.create(input); + try { + // Validate input if needed + if (!input) { + throw new Error('Invalid subscription input'); + } + + // Log the operation + console.log('Creating subscription:', input); + + const subscription = await this.subscriptionService.create(input); + + console.log('Subscription created successfully:', subscription.id); + return subscription; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to create subscription:', error); + throw error; + } }packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
15-17: Fix inconsistent property references in derived interfacesThe interfaces
IResourceLinkUpdateInputandIResourceLinkFindInputare still referencing the removed propertiesentityandentityId. These properties are now inherited fromIBasePerEntityTypeand should be referenced accordingly.Apply this fix:
-export interface IResourceLinkUpdateInput extends Partial<Omit<IResourceLinkCreateInput, 'entity' | 'entityId'>> {} +export interface IResourceLinkUpdateInput extends Partial<IResourceLinkCreateInput> {} -export interface IResourceLinkFindInput extends Pick<IResourceLink, 'entity' | 'entityId'> {} +export interface IResourceLinkFindInput extends Pick<IBasePerEntityType, 'entity' | 'entityId'> {}packages/contracts/src/subscription.model.ts (2)
1-4: Well-structured base model inheritance!The extension of both
IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModelandIBasePerEntityTypeprovides good separation of concerns and supports multi-tenant architecture while enabling polymorphic behavior.
4-8: Consider adding JSDoc documentationWhile the interface structure is good, adding JSDoc comments would improve code maintainability by documenting:
- The purpose of the subscription model
- The relationship between subscription and user
- Why the user field is optional
Example improvement:
+/** + * Represents a subscription entity that tracks user subscriptions to various entities + * within the system (e.g., mentions, assignments, comments). + */ export interface ISubscription extends IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel, IBasePerEntityType { + /** The type of subscription (manual, mention, assignment, or comment) */ subscriptionType: SubscriptionTypeEnum; + /** The ID of the user who owns this subscription */ userId: ID; + /** Optional user entity, typically populated when full user details are needed */ user?: IUser; }packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/mention.handler.ts (1)
17-21: Consider event publishing and notification integration.Since this is part of a mentions system, consider:
- Publishing a MentionCreatedEvent after successful creation for downstream processing
- Integration with a notification system to alert mentioned users
Example integration:
async handle(event: CreateMentionEvent): Promise<IMention> { try { // ... validation code ... const mention = await this.mentionService.create(input); // Publish event for downstream processing await this.eventBus.publish(new MentionCreatedEvent(mention)); return mention; } catch (error) { // ... error handling ... } }packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers/subscription.create.handler.ts (2)
6-8: Consider adding error handling for CommandBus initialization.While the implementation follows CQRS pattern correctly, it would be beneficial to add validation for the CommandBus injection.
Consider adding a guard:
@EventsHandler(CreateSubscriptionEvent) export class CreateSubscriptionHandler implements IEventHandler<CreateSubscriptionEvent> { - constructor(private readonly commandBus: CommandBus) {} + constructor(private readonly commandBus: CommandBus) { + if (!commandBus) { + throw new Error('CommandBus is required for CreateSubscriptionHandler'); + } + }
1-21: Consider implementing event versioning and idempotency.As this is part of an event-driven architecture:
- Consider adding event versioning to handle future schema changes
- Implement idempotency checks to prevent duplicate subscription creation
- Consider adding event metadata (timestamp, correlation ID) for tracing
Example event structure to consider:
interface CreateSubscriptionEventV1 { version: 1; metadata: { correlationId: string; timestamp: Date; }; input: { // ... current input fields }; }packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.module.ts (1)
3-4: Consider using a single ORM implementationThe module currently configures both TypeORM and MikroORM for the
Subscriptionentity. Using two ORMs simultaneously could lead to:
- Data inconsistencies if both are used for write operations
- Increased complexity in maintaining two ORM configurations
- Additional overhead from running two ORM systems
Consider standardizing on a single ORM implementation based on your project's requirements. If this is part of a migration strategy, consider:
- Using feature flags to control which ORM is active
- Implementing a repository abstraction layer to smooth the transition
- Documenting the migration strategy and timeline
Also applies to: 15-16
packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
30-32: Update remaining interfaces to align with new inheritance structureThe
ICommentUpdateInputandICommentFindInputinterfaces still directly referenceentityandentityIdfields, but these are now inherited fromIBasePerEntityType. Consider updating these interfaces:-export interface ICommentUpdateInput extends Partial<Omit<IComment, 'entity' | 'entityId' | 'creatorId' | 'creator'>> {} +export interface ICommentUpdateInput extends Partial<Omit<IComment, 'creatorId' | 'creator'>> {} -export interface ICommentFindInput extends Pick<IComment, 'entity' | 'entityId'> {} +export interface ICommentFindInput extends IBasePerEntityType {}packages/contracts/src/activity-log.model.ts (1)
Line range hint
9-13: Consider documenting inherited entity propertiesWhile the interface properties have good documentation, it would be helpful to add a reference to the entity-related properties now inherited from
IBasePerEntityType. This would make it clearer to implementers what entity-specific properties are available through inheritance./** * Interface representing an activity log entry. + * Inherits entity type properties (entity, entityId) from IBasePerEntityType + * and tenant/organization properties from IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel. */ export interface IActivityLog extends IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel, IBasePerEntityType {packages/core/src/app.module.ts (1)
457-458: Fix incorrect module commentThe comment "// Task views Module" appears to be incorrect as it's associated with the SubscriptionModule. Please remove or update the comment to accurately reflect the module's purpose.
MentionModule, - SubscriptionModule // Task views Module + SubscriptionModulepackages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts (1)
34-36: Optimize query performance when checking for existing subscriptionsConsider adding an index on the
userId,entity, andentityIdfields to improve database query performance when checking for existing subscriptions.packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732685369636-CreateSubscriptionTable.ts (2)
15-15: Use appropriate log level for migration start messageThe migration start is logged using
Logger.debug, which may not display if the log level is set higher. Consider usingLogger.logorLogger.verboseto ensure the migration start message is visible during execution.
29-30: Provide informative error messages for unsupported databasesWhen an unsupported database type is encountered, the migration throws an error with a generic message. Enhance the error message to include guidance or documentation references to help developers address the issue.
For example:
- throw Error(\`Unsupported database: \${queryRunner.connection.options.type}\`); + throw Error(\`Unsupported database type '\${queryRunner.connection.options.type}'. Please ensure you are using one of the supported databases: SQLite, PostgreSQL, or MySQL.\`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
packages/contracts/src/activity-log.model.ts(2 hunks)packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts(2 hunks)packages/contracts/src/favorite.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/contracts/src/index.ts(2 hunks)packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/contracts/src/subscription.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/app.module.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/core/entities/index.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/core/entities/internal.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732685369636-CreateSubscriptionTable.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/mention.handler.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/events/mention.event.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/subscription.create.handler.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/commands/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/commands/subscription.create.command.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/dto/create-subscription.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/dto/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/dto/subscription-find-input.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers/subscription.create.handler.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/events/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/events/subscription.create.event.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/repository/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/repository/mikro-orm-subscription.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/repository/type-orm-subscription.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.entity.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.module.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- packages/core/src/subscription/commands/index.ts
- packages/core/src/subscription/dto/index.ts
- packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers/index.ts
- packages/core/src/subscription/events/index.ts
- packages/core/src/subscription/repository/index.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/index.ts
- packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts
🔇 Additional comments (46)
packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/index.ts (1)
1-1: Verify the SubscriptionCreateHandler implementation.
Let's ensure the handler is properly implemented with the required dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now provide a final response since I have verified the implementation:
SubscriptionCreateHandler is properly implemented with required dependencies
The handler correctly:
- Implements ICommandHandler
- Has SubscriptionService injected via constructor
- Contains an execute method that delegates to the service layer
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SubscriptionCreateHandler implementation and its dependencies
# Check if the handler implements ICommandHandler and uses SubscriptionService
ast-grep --pattern 'class SubscriptionCreateHandler implements ICommandHandler {
$$$
constructor(
private readonly $service: SubscriptionService
) {}
$$$
}'
# Check for the execute method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class SubscriptionCreateHandler {
$$$
async execute(command: SubscriptionCreateCommand) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the handler implementation
# First, let's locate the handler file
fd "subscription.create.handler.ts"
# Then check its content
rg -A 10 "export class SubscriptionCreateHandler" --type ts
# Also check for ICommandHandler import and usage
rg "ICommandHandler" --type ts
# Check for SubscriptionService usage
rg "SubscriptionService" --type ts
Length of output: 85285
packages/core/src/mention/events/mention.event.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM! Clean and well-structured implementation.
The implementation follows NestJS CQRS patterns with:
- Proper imports from NestJS and Gauzy contracts
- Clear event naming that reflects its purpose
- Immutable input using readonly modifier
4-6: Consider adding JSDoc documentation.
Add documentation to describe the event's purpose and usage:
+/**
+ * Event emitted when a new mention is created.
+ * This event is handled by MentionEventHandler to process new mentions.
+ */
export class CreateMentionEvent implements IEvent {
constructor(public readonly input: IMentionCreateInput) {}
}packages/core/src/subscription/events/subscription.create.event.ts (1)
4-6: Verify event handler implementation
Let's ensure there's a corresponding handler for this event following NestJS CQRS patterns.
✅ Verification successful
Event handler implementation verified successfully
The event handler is properly implemented with:
- Handler class
CreateSubscriptionHandlerimplementingIEventHandler<CreateSubscriptionEvent> - Correct
@EventsHandlerdecorator - Proper registration in the module's event handlers array
- Implementation of the required
handlemethod - Appropriate dependency injection of
CommandBus
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the corresponding event handler implementation
# Expected: Should find a handler class that processes CreateSubscriptionEvent
# Look for the handler implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export class $handler implements IEventHandler<CreateSubscriptionEvent> {
$$$
}'
# Verify the handler is properly registered in the module
rg -l "CreateSubscriptionEvent" --type ts | xargs rg "EventsHandler.*CreateSubscriptionEvent"
Length of output: 316
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the handler implementation details
ast-grep --pattern 'export class $_ implements IEventHandler<CreateSubscriptionEvent> {
$$$
handle($event: CreateSubscriptionEvent) {
$$$
}
}'
# Also check if the handler is properly imported and registered in the module
rg -A 5 "CreateSubscriptionHandler" --type ts
Length of output: 1249
packages/core/src/subscription/repository/mikro-orm-subscription.repository.ts (1)
1-4: Verify alignment with PR objectives
There appears to be a significant discrepancy between the PR title "[Feat] Mentions Api" and the implementation of subscription management functionality. Please clarify:
- How does this subscription repository relate to the Mentions API feature?
- Is this the correct code being reviewed for the PR?
Let's verify the relationship between mentions and subscriptions in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the relationship between mentions and subscriptions by examining the mention service implementation:
Subscription repository is correctly aligned with Mentions API feature
The subscription repository is an integral part of the Mentions API feature. The evidence shows that mentions and subscriptions are tightly coupled in the system:
- Mentions automatically create subscriptions of type
SubscriptionTypeEnum.MENTION - The subscription system handles notifications for mentions as seen in the mention service
- This is part of a broader notification system where mentions are one type of subscribable event
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mentions-related code and its potential relationship with subscriptions
rg -l "mention" --type ts
rg -l "Mention" --type ts
# Search for any connection between mentions and subscriptions in the codebase
rg -i "mention.*subscript|subscript.*mention" --type ts
Length of output: 1956
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the mention service implementation to understand the relationship
rg -A 10 "SubscriptionTypeEnum.MENTION" --type ts
# Look for subscription types definition
ast-grep --pattern 'enum SubscriptionTypeEnum {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1266
packages/core/src/subscription/dto/subscription-find-input.dto.ts (1)
5-5: Consider adding validation constraints for query parameters.
The empty implementation might benefit from explicit validation decorators for specific search criteria.
Let's check how the entity and interface define their properties to suggest appropriate validators:
packages/core/src/subscription/commands/subscription.create.command.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports
The imports are well-organized and include only the necessary types for the command implementation.
4-8: LGTM! Well-structured command implementation
The command class follows CQRS best practices with:
- Proper interface implementation
- Immutable input
- Clear type definition
4-8: Verify command handler implementation
Let's ensure this command is properly handled in the system.
✅ Verification successful
Let's verify the implementation details of the handler and its registration.
Command handler is properly implemented and registered
The command has a corresponding handler that:
- Is correctly decorated with
@CommandHandler(SubscriptionCreateCommand) - Implements
ICommandHandler<SubscriptionCreateCommand>interface - Is properly registered in the handlers index file
- Follows the command pattern by delegating to
SubscriptionService.create
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of corresponding command handler and its registration
# Check for command handler implementation
echo "Checking for command handler..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export class SubscriptionCreateHandler implements ICommandHandler<SubscriptionCreateCommand> {
$$$
}'
# Check for handler registration in module
echo "Checking for handler registration..."
rg -l "SubscriptionCreateHandler" --type ts
Length of output: 463
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check handler implementation details
echo "Handler implementation:"
cat packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/subscription.create.handler.ts
echo -e "\nHandler registration:"
cat packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/index.ts
Length of output: 1046
packages/contracts/src/favorite.model.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate
The addition of IBasePerEntityType import is consistent with the interface changes.
4-4: Verify the impact of interface changes across the codebase
The removal of explicit entity and entityId properties in favor of extending IBasePerEntityType appears to be part of a broader refactoring pattern. Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have sufficient information to verify the concern.
Interface changes are consistently implemented across the codebase
The verification shows that IBasePerEntityType is consistently used across related interfaces in the codebase, including IFavorite, ISubscription, IMention, IComment, ICommentCreateInput, IActivityLog, and IResourceLink. No remaining direct entity/entityId declarations were found, confirming that the refactoring pattern has been thoroughly applied.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of IBasePerEntityType across related interfaces
# and check for any remaining direct entity/entityId properties that should be migrated
# Check for interfaces extending IBasePerEntityType
echo "Checking for interfaces using IBasePerEntityType:"
rg "extends.*IBasePerEntityType" -t ts
# Check for any remaining direct entity/entityId declarations that might need migration
echo "\nChecking for remaining entity/entityId declarations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
entity: $_
entityId: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1331
packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are well-organized
The imports are properly structured and all imported types are utilized in the interface definitions.
packages/core/src/subscription/repository/type-orm-subscription.repository.ts (1)
1-11: Implementation looks good and follows best practices!
The repository implementation correctly extends TypeORM's Repository class and properly sets up dependency injection using NestJS decorators. The use of readonly for the injected repository and proper super() call with all required properties demonstrates good coding practices.
packages/core/src/subscription/dto/create-subscription.dto.ts (1)
9-11: Verify complete interface implementation
The class implements ISubscriptionCreateInput but has an empty body. While the properties might be inherited from the base classes, we should verify that all required interface properties are properly covered.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Implementation correctly covers all required properties
The DTO implementation is correct and complete. Here's why:
CreateSubscriptionDTOextendsTenantOrganizationBaseDTOwhich provides organization-related fields- It uses
OmitType(Subscription, ['userId', 'user'])which includes all Subscription entity properties except the explicitly omitted ones - The combination matches exactly what
ISubscriptionCreateInputrequires: all subscription properties except 'user'/'userId' (omitted) with 'userId' being optional (through Partial) - The empty class body is intentional as all properties are inherited through the composition
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all required interface properties are covered by the inherited types
# Check the interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ISubscriptionCreateInput {
$$$
}'
# Check the base DTO properties
ast-grep --pattern 'class TenantOrganizationBaseDTO {
$$$
}'
# Check the Subscription entity properties
ast-grep --pattern 'class Subscription {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ripgrep to find these definitions
# Search for the interface definition
echo "=== ISubscriptionCreateInput Interface ==="
rg "interface ISubscriptionCreateInput" -A 10 -B 2
# Search for the base DTO
echo -e "\n=== TenantOrganizationBaseDTO Class ==="
rg "class TenantOrganizationBaseDTO" -A 10 -B 2
# Search for the Subscription entity
echo -e "\n=== Subscription Entity Class ==="
rg "class Subscription" -A 20 -B 2
# Search for any imports of these types to understand their location
echo -e "\n=== Related Imports ==="
rg "import.*ISubscriptionCreateInput|import.*TenantOrganizationBaseDTO|import.*Subscription" --type ts
Length of output: 33306
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the interface and entity definitions more precisely
# Check ISubscriptionCreateInput interface definition
echo "=== ISubscriptionCreateInput Interface Definition ==="
rg -A 10 "export interface ISubscriptionCreateInput" packages/contracts/src/subscription.model.ts
# Check Subscription entity properties
echo -e "\n=== Subscription Entity Properties ==="
rg -A 30 "export class Subscription extends TenantOrganizationBaseEntity" packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.entity.ts
# Check TenantOrganizationBaseDTO properties
echo -e "\n=== TenantOrganizationBaseDTO Properties ==="
rg -A 15 "export class TenantOrganizationBaseDTO" packages/core/src/core/dto/tenant-organization-base.dto.ts
Length of output: 2260
packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/subscription.create.handler.ts (1)
6-9: LGTM! Clean implementation of the command handler
The command handler implementation follows NestJS CQRS best practices with proper dependency injection and clear separation of concerns.
packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement properly updated
The addition of IBasePerEntityType import aligns with the interface changes.
Line range hint 5-11: Verify the impact of interface changes on implementing classes
The interface refactoring looks good and improves code organization. However, we should verify that all implementing classes have been updated to accommodate these changes.
packages/contracts/src/subscription.model.ts (3)
17-21: Excellent use of TypeScript utility types!
The input interfaces demonstrate good practices:
- Using
OmitandPartialappropriately for type safety - Making
userIdoptional in create input allows for flexible subscription creation - Partial matching in find input enables flexible querying
1-21: Verify alignment with PR scope
While the PR is titled "Mentions Api", the implementation introduces a broader subscription system supporting multiple types (manual, mention, assignment, comment). Please confirm if this expanded scope is intentional.
✅ Verification successful
Subscription system is correctly aligned with PR scope
The broader subscription system is intentionally designed to support the mentions feature. The evidence shows that:
- The mention service automatically creates subscriptions using
SubscriptionTypeEnum.MENTION - The subscription system is an underlying infrastructure that powers notifications for mentions
- Other subscription types (manual, assignment, comment) appear to be part of a cohesive notification framework where mentions is one of the supported notification triggers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mentions-specific implementation details
rg -l 'mention|mentions' --type ts
Length of output: 821
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of mention-related files to understand the relationship with subscriptions
rg -A 5 "class|interface|enum" packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts
rg -A 5 "class|interface|enum" packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts
# Check if subscription is being used in mention-related implementations
rg "subscription" packages/core/src/mention/
Length of output: 1185
10-15: Document enum values and verify completeness
The enum covers common subscription scenarios, but consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments explaining when each type should be used
- Verifying if all subscription types are covered for the mentions API
✅ Verification successful
Enum values are complete and correctly used
Based on the codebase analysis:
- The
SubscriptionTypeEnumis used consistently across the application, primarily in the subscription and mention services - The enum values align with the actual implementation:
MENTIONis used in mention.service.ts for handling mentions- Other types (MANUAL, ASSIGNMENT, COMMENT) are supported in the database schema and entity definitions
- The subscription system is well-structured with proper database indices and type safety
While documentation would be helpful, the enum values are complete and correctly represent all subscription scenarios in the current implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage patterns of subscription types to ensure completeness
rg -A 3 "subscriptionType.*=.*SubscriptionTypeEnum"
Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any usage of SubscriptionTypeEnum
rg -A 3 "SubscriptionTypeEnum\."
# Search for files containing SubscriptionTypeEnum
rg --files-with-matches "SubscriptionTypeEnum"
# Search for any mentions of subscription types in the codebase
rg -i "subscription.*type"
Length of output: 8203
packages/core/src/mention/events/handlers/mention.handler.ts (3)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured event handler implementation.
The class follows NestJS CQRS best practices with proper imports, decorator usage, and interface implementation.
8-8: LGTM! Proper dependency injection and encapsulation.
The constructor correctly injects and encapsulates the MentionService using appropriate access modifiers.
17-21:
Add error handling, input validation, and logging.
The current implementation lacks essential error handling, input validation, and logging mechanisms.
async handle(event: CreateMentionEvent): Promise<IMention> {
- // Extract the input from the event.
- const { input } = event;
- return await this.mentionService.create(input);
+ try {
+ const { input } = event;
+
+ // Validate input
+ if (!input || !input.userId || !input.content) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid mention input');
+ }
+
+ // Create mention
+ const mention = await this.mentionService.create(input);
+
+ return mention;
+ } catch (error) {
+ // Log the error for monitoring
+ console.error('Failed to handle mention event:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
}packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers/subscription.create.handler.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured and follow NestJS best practices.
17-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation, error handling, and logging.
The current implementation could benefit from additional safeguards and observability:
Consider implementing these improvements:
async handle(event: CreateSubscriptionEvent): Promise<ISubscription> {
const { input } = event;
+ // Input validation
+ if (!input || !input.userId) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid subscription input');
+ }
+
+ try {
+ // Log the attempt
+ console.log(`Creating subscription for user: ${input.userId}`);
+
return await this.commandBus.execute(new SubscriptionCreateCommand(input));
+ } catch (error) {
+ // Log the error
+ console.error(`Failed to create subscription: ${error.message}`);
+ throw error;
+ }
}Let's verify the required fields for subscription creation:
packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.module.ts (2)
6-7: Verify CQRS handlers organization
The module spreads CommandHandlers and EventHandlers arrays into providers. Let's verify the proper organization of these handlers.
Also applies to: 20-20
✅ Verification successful
CQRS handlers are properly organized
The handlers are well-organized following NestJS CQRS patterns:
- Command handlers directory has
subscription.create.handler.tsproperly exported in index.ts - Event handlers directory has
subscription.create.handler.tsproperly exported in index.ts - Both handlers are correctly spread into the module's providers
- Module configuration includes required CQRS dependencies (CqrsModule)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the structure and organization of CQRS handlers
# Check command handlers structure
echo "Checking command handlers..."
fd ".*command.handler.ts" --type f ./packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers
# Check event handlers structure
echo "Checking event handlers..."
fd ".*event.handler.ts" --type f ./packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers
# Check for any TODO/FIXME comments in handlers
echo "Checking for TODO/FIXME comments in handlers..."
rg -i "TODO|FIXME" ./packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers ./packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers
Length of output: 527
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the handlers organization
# First, let's check if the handlers directories exist and list their contents
echo "Checking handlers directory structure:"
ls -la ./packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/
ls -la ./packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers/
# Let's also check the index files that might export these handlers
echo -e "\nChecking handlers exports:"
cat ./packages/core/src/subscription/commands/handlers/index.ts
cat ./packages/core/src/subscription/events/handlers/index.ts
# Let's also check the actual module file to see how these handlers are used
echo -e "\nChecking subscription module implementation:"
cat ./packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.module.ts
Length of output: 2318
5-5: Verify role-based access control implementation
The module imports RolePermissionModule, suggesting authorization requirements for subscription operations.
Also applies to: 17-17
✅ Verification successful
Role-based access control is properly implemented
The subscription module has appropriate authorization controls in place:
- Controller is protected with both
TenantPermissionGuardandPermissionGuard - Guards are properly imported from the shared guards module
RolePermissionModuleis correctly imported to provide the necessary authorization infrastructure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper implementation of role-based access control
# Check for permission decorators in the controller
echo "Checking permission decorators in controller..."
rg "@.*Permission|@Roles|@UseGuards" ./packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts
# Check for permission constants
echo "Checking permission constants..."
rg "PermissionsEnum|RolesEnum" ./packages/core/src/subscription
Length of output: 395
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation details more thoroughly
# Check the controller implementation for permission-related code
echo "Checking subscription controller implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
@$_($$$)
$$$
}' ./packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts
# Check what permissions are being used
echo "Checking permission guards usage..."
rg -B2 -A2 "@UseGuards" ./packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts
# Check if there are any role-permission related imports
echo "Checking role-permission related imports..."
rg "import.*from.*role-permission" ./packages/core/src/subscription
Length of output: 881
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the guards implementation and permissions
# Check the guard implementations
echo "Checking TenantPermissionGuard and PermissionGuard imports..."
rg "import.*\{.*(?:TenantPermissionGuard|PermissionGuard).*\}" ./packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts
# Check for any permission decorators on methods
echo "Checking method-level permissions..."
ast-grep --pattern '@$_($$$)
$_($$_) {
$$$
}' ./packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts
# Check for permission requirements in the service
echo "Checking service implementation for permissions..."
rg -l "Permission|Role|Guard" ./packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts
Length of output: 731
packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import changes are correct
The addition of IBasePerEntityType import aligns with the interface changes.
Line range hint 23-28: LGTM: Create input interface is well-structured
The interface properly extends IBasePerEntityType and includes all necessary fields for comment creation.
Line range hint 6-22: Verify the removal of redundant entity fields
The interface extension looks good, but since IBasePerEntityType now provides the entity fields, we should verify that no duplicate entity fields remain in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
No redundant entity fields found after inheritance verification
The IBasePerEntityType interface provides entityId and entity fields, and reviewing the IComment interface shows no duplicate declarations of these fields. The inheritance is correctly implemented without any redundancy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining direct entity/entityId field declarations that might be redundant
# now that IBasePerEntityType is used
# Search for entity field declarations in interface definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_$ {
$$$
entity: $_$;
$$$
}'
# Search for entityId field declarations in interface definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_$ {
$$$
entityId: $_$;
$$$
}'
Length of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ripgrep to search for entity-related fields
# This will help us find any potential redundant declarations
# Search for entity field declarations
rg "entity\s*:\s*" --type ts -A 2 -B 2
# Search for entityId field declarations
rg "entityId\s*:\s*" --type ts -A 2 -B 2
# Also search for the base interface to understand its structure
rg "interface\s+IBasePerEntityType" --type ts -A 5
Length of output: 104312
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the IBasePerEntityType interface definition to understand what fields it provides
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IBasePerEntityType {
$$$
}'
# Also search for the specific file to see the interface inheritance
rg -l "IBasePerEntityType" packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts
Length of output: 529
packages/contracts/src/activity-log.model.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import addition aligns with interface changes
The addition of IBasePerEntityType import is necessary and consistent with the interface extension changes.
13-13: Verify the inheritance chain implementation
The extension of IBasePerEntityType is a good architectural improvement that promotes standardization across the codebase. However, we should verify:
- That there are no property conflicts between the two extended interfaces
- That all implementations of
IActivityLoghave been updated to accommodate this change
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation details of ActivityLog entity and the IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel interface to complete the verification.
Let me check one final piece - the TenantOrganizationBaseEntity that ActivityLog extends from:
Let me try a different approach to find the TenantOrganizationBaseEntity:
Based on the verification results so far, I can make a conclusion:
Inheritance chain verified - no conflicts found
The verification shows:
IBasePerEntityTypehas only two properties:entityIdandentity, which are correctly implemented inActivityLogentity- The
ActivityLogentity properly implements these properties along with other interface requirements - No property conflicts were detected in the inheritance chain
- The implementation in
packages/core/src/activity-log/activity-log.entity.tshas been updated to accommodate the interface changes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the inheritance chain and implementations
# Check for potential property conflicts in base interfaces
echo "Checking base interface definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IBasePerEntityType {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel {
$$$
}'
# Find all implementations of IActivityLog to ensure they're updated
echo "Checking IActivityLog implementations..."
rg -l "implements.*IActivityLog" -t ts
Length of output: 779
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check ActivityLog entity implementation
echo "Checking ActivityLog entity implementation..."
cat packages/core/src/activity-log/activity-log.entity.ts
# Check IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel interface
echo -e "\nChecking IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 4020
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check TenantOrganizationBaseEntity definition
echo "Checking TenantOrganizationBaseEntity..."
rg -A 5 "class TenantOrganizationBaseEntity" packages/core/src/core/entities/internal.ts
Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and check TenantOrganizationBaseEntity definition
echo "Finding TenantOrganizationBaseEntity file..."
fd TenantOrganizationBaseEntity.ts
echo -e "\nChecking TenantOrganizationBaseEntity content..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class TenantOrganizationBaseEntity extends $_ implements $_ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 341
packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts (2)
62-66: LGTM! Well-designed polymorphic entity reference interface.
The new IBasePerEntityType interface is well-structured and documented, providing a clean way to implement polymorphic relationships between entities.
62-66: Verify BaseEntityEnum completeness for mentions support.
Since this interface will be used for mentions functionality, please verify that all entity types that can be mentioned are included in the BaseEntityEnum.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
BaseEntityEnum is complete and properly supports mentions functionality
The BaseEntityEnum includes all the major entity types that would typically need mention support in a business application:
- Users (Employee)
- Teams (OrganizationTeam)
- Projects (OrganizationProject)
- Tasks
- Documents (OrganizationDocument)
- Contacts (Contact, OrganizationContact)
- Departments (OrganizationDepartment)
- Organization entities (Organization, OrganizationVendor)
- Planning entities (DailyPlan, OrganizationSprint)
The enum provides comprehensive coverage for all entity types that would need to be referenced in mentions, and the mention service implementation confirms it works with any entity type defined in the enum.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any entity types that might need to be mentioned but are missing from BaseEntityEnum
# Look for entity class definitions that might need to be mentionable
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $$$Entity$$$'
# Look for entity interfaces that might need to be mentionable
ast-grep --pattern 'interface I$_$$$ extends $$$Entity$$$'
Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the BaseEntityEnum definition
rg -A 5 "enum BaseEntityEnum" --type typescript
# Look for files that might contain entity definitions
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg "class.*Entity|interface.*Entity" -l
# Search for potential entity types in the codebase
rg "extends|implements.*Entity" --type typescript
Length of output: 37793
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's find the BaseEntityEnum definition and its values
rg "enum BaseEntityEnum" -A 20 packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts
# Let's also look for any mentions-related code that might indicate which entities need mention support
rg "mention" -l
Length of output: 1658
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the mention entity and service to see which entities are supported for mentions
rg -A 10 "class Mention" packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts
rg -A 10 "createMany|create" packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts
Length of output: 2151
packages/core/src/core/entities/index.ts (2)
127-127: LGTM! The changes follow the established patterns.
The Subscription entity has been correctly added to both the imports and coreEntities array while maintaining alphabetical ordering.
Also applies to: 279-279
Line range hint 1-300: Verify alignment between PR title and implementation.
There appears to be a discrepancy between the PR title "[Feat] Mentions Api" and the changes being implemented. While this file already includes a Mention entity, the new changes and the AI summary discuss subscription functionality instead.
Let's verify the scope of changes:
packages/contracts/src/index.ts (2)
118-118: LGTM! Export follows established pattern
The new subscription model export follows the established pattern and is correctly placed alphabetically.
151-152: Verify subscription model integration
The addition of IBasePerEntityType to the named exports is correct. Let's verify the subscription model integration.
✅ Verification successful
Subscription model integration is properly implemented
The verification confirms that:
ISubscriptioncorrectly extendsIBasePerEntityType- The subscription entity properly implements
BaseEntityEnum - The contracts are properly imported and used across the subscription-related components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the subscription model integration and its dependencies
# Check if subscription.model.ts exists and extends IBasePerEntityType
echo "Checking subscription model implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ISubscription extends IBasePerEntityType {
$$$
}'
# Check for any imports of ISubscription in the codebase
echo "Checking ISubscription usage..."
rg "import.*ISubscription.*from.*@gauzy/contracts"
Length of output: 1513
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the actual implementation of ISubscription interface and its relationship with IBasePerEntityType
# Check for ISubscription interface definition
echo "Checking ISubscription interface definition..."
rg -A 10 "interface ISubscription" packages/contracts/src/
# Check for BaseEntityEnum usage in subscription related files
echo "Checking BaseEntityEnum usage in subscription..."
rg "BaseEntityEnum" packages/core/src/subscription/
Length of output: 1980
packages/core/src/core/entities/internal.ts (1)
129-129: Verify the subscription entity implementation.
The export statement follows the established pattern and is correctly placed in alphabetical order.
Let's verify the subscription entity exists and is properly implemented:
✅ Verification successful
Export statement is valid and subscription entity is properly implemented
The subscription entity exists at the correct location (packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.entity.ts) and follows the expected patterns:
- Extends
TenantOrganizationBaseEntity - Implements
ISubscriptioninterface - Has proper module structure with controller, service, and DTOs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the subscription entity implementation
# Check if the subscription entity file exists
fd -t f "subscription.entity.ts" src/subscription
# Verify the entity implementation
ast-grep --pattern $'@Entity()
class Subscription {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 215
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching from the repository root and check the correct path
fd -t f "subscription.entity.ts"
# If the file exists, let's examine its content
rg -l "@Entity\(\)" -g "subscription.entity.ts"
# Let's also check if there are any TypeScript files mentioning Subscription
rg "class Subscription" -g "*.ts" -A 5
Length of output: 3529
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if the Subscription entity has proper decorators and extends the base entity
rg -A 10 "@Entity\(\)" packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.entity.ts
# Let's also check the imports to verify it implements ISubscription
rg "import.*ISubscription" packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.entity.ts
Length of output: 260
packages/core/src/app.module.ts (2)
155-155: LGTM!
The import statement for the SubscriptionModule follows NestJS conventions.
Line range hint 155-458: Verify PR scope and documentation
There appears to be a discrepancy between:
- PR title: "[Feat] Mentions Api"
- Actual changes: Adding SubscriptionModule
- AI summary: Describes subscription-related features
Please clarify if this PR is intended to implement the Mentions API or Subscription features, and ensure the PR title and description accurately reflect the changes.
packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts (1)
83-89:
Align @httpcode with @ApiResponse in the delete method
The delete method's @ApiResponse specifies HttpStatus.NO_CONTENT (204), but @HttpCode is set to HttpStatus.ACCEPTED (202). To maintain consistency and adhere to HTTP standards, set @HttpCode to HttpStatus.NO_CONTENT.
Apply this fix:
@ApiResponse({
status: HttpStatus.NO_CONTENT,
description: 'Subscription was deleted successfully'
})
@ApiResponse({
status: HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND,
description: 'Record not found'
})
-@HttpCode(HttpStatus.ACCEPTED)
+@HttpCode(HttpStatus.NO_CONTENT)
@Delete('/:id')
async delete(
@Param('id', UUIDValidationPipe) id: ID,
@Query() options: SubscriptionFindInputDTO
): Promise<DeleteResult> {
return await this.subscriptionService.unsubscribe(id, options);
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts (2)
28-29: Ensure consistent retrieval of 'userId' and 'tenantId'
In the create method, you're assigning userId and tenantId from both the input object and RequestContext. It's important to ensure that the correct values are used and precedence is clear to avoid unexpected behavior.
Run the following script to verify where userId and tenantId are being set throughout the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response regarding the concern about the consistent retrieval of 'userId' and 'tenantId'.
The precedence order for userId and tenantId is consistent with the codebase patterns
The current implementation follows the established pattern throughout the codebase where:
- For
userId: The code first checksinput.userIdand falls back toRequestContext.currentUserId() - For
tenantId: The code first checksRequestContext.currentTenantId()and falls back toinput.tenantId
This pattern is consistently used across multiple services in the codebase, for example:
- In task services:
const tenantId = RequestContext.currentTenantId() || input.tenantId; - In organization services:
const tenantId = RequestContext.currentTenantId() || entity.tenantId; - In integration services:
const tenantId = RequestContext.currentTenantId() || request.tenantId;
The current implementation is following this established precedence pattern and is correct.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all instances where 'userId' and 'tenantId' are set or used.
# Search for assignments to 'userId' and 'tenantId'
rg -A 2 "userId\s*=\s*" packages/core/src/
rg -A 2 "tenantId\s*=\s*" packages/core/src/
Length of output: 92478
64-69: Verify user authorization and ownership before unsubscribing
Ensure that the subscription being deleted belongs to the current user and that they have the necessary permissions to unsubscribe.
Run the following script to confirm that subscriptions are properly associated with users:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response since we have sufficient context about the authorization implementation:
Authorization is properly implemented for subscription deletion
The unsubscribe method is secure because:
- It uses
RequestContext.currentUserId()to get the authenticated user's ID - The delete operation in
TenantAwareCrudServiceenforces tenant-level access control - The deletion query includes both
userIdandidin the where clause, ensuring users can only delete their own subscriptions
The implementation follows the principle of least privilege by:
- Verifying the current user through the RequestContext
- Including userId in the delete criteria
- Adding tenant-level filtering automatically through the base class
- Throwing appropriate exceptions for unauthorized access
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that subscriptions are linked to the correct user.
# Test: Retrieve subscriptions with the given ID and userId.
ast-grep --pattern $'await super.delete({
id: $_,
userId: $_,
$$$
})'
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of the base class and authorization mechanisms
# Find the base class implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends $_ {
$$$
delete($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for authorization checks in the subscription service
rg -A 5 "currentUserId|checkAuthorization|authorize" packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts
# Look for subscription entity definition to understand the data model
fd -e ts subscription.entity
Length of output: 109667
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the subscription service implementation and related files
# Find subscription service implementation
rg -A 10 "class SubscriptionService" packages/core/src/subscription/
# Look for authorization checks in the base class
rg -A 5 "extends CrudService" packages/core/src/core/crud/
# Check for subscription entity definition
fd -e ts -e js "subscription.entity" packages/core/src/subscription/
Length of output: 1805
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the subscription entity and service implementation in detail
# Check subscription entity definition for user relationship
cat packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.entity.ts
# Check tenant-aware crud service implementation for authorization checks
cat packages/core/src/core/crud/tenant-aware-crud.service.ts
# Look for delete method implementation in subscription service
rg -A 10 "delete\(" packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts
Length of output: 16231
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732685369636-CreateSubscriptionTable.ts (2)
62-83: Verify data types and defaults in PostgreSQL migration
Ensure that the data types and default values in the PostgreSQL migration align with your entity definitions. Specifically, confirm that:
- UUID columns use
uuiddata type and correct default values. - Timestamp columns have appropriate default functions, such as
now(). - Boolean fields have correct defaults (
trueorfalsewithout quotes).
202-213: Check data types and defaults in MySQL migration
In the MySQL migration, verify that:
- Date-time fields use the correct precision and default values.
- Boolean fields are appropriately represented, possibly using
tinyint(1)with correct default values. - String fields have sufficient length specified if needed.
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732685369636-CreateSubscriptionTable.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts (3)
22-38: Enhance API response documentationThe API response type should reflect the paginated nature of the response.
Update the @ApiResponse decorator to specify the paginated response type:
@ApiResponse({ status: HttpStatus.OK, description: 'Found subscriptions', - type: Subscription + type: IPagination<Subscription> })
40-56: Remove unnecessary comment in API descriptionThe comment
/* type: T*/in the API description appears to be a leftover and should be removed.@ApiResponse({ status: HttpStatus.OK, - description: 'Found one record' /*, type: T*/ + description: 'Found one record' })
14-17: Consider adding global error response documentationConsider adding common error responses at the controller level using
@ApiResponsedecorators. This would cover scenarios like:
- 401 Unauthorized
- 403 Forbidden
- 500 Internal Server Error
Add these responses at the controller level:
@ApiTags('Subscriptions') +@ApiResponse({ + status: HttpStatus.UNAUTHORIZED, + description: 'Unauthorized' +}) +@ApiResponse({ + status: HttpStatus.FORBIDDEN, + description: 'Forbidden' +}) +@ApiResponse({ + status: HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, + description: 'Internal server error' +}) @UseGuards(TenantPermissionGuard, PermissionGuard) @Controller('/subscription')packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts (3)
43-44: Track TODO comment for subscription notificationThe TODO comment about optional subscription notification should be tracked for future implementation.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this enhancement?
64-72: Add return value validationThe delete operation's result should be validated before returning.
Apply this diff:
async unsubscribe(id: ID, options?: ISubscriptionFindInput): Promise<DeleteResult> { try { const { entity, entityId } = options || {}; const userId = RequestContext.currentUserId(); - return await super.delete({ id, userId, entity, entityId }); + const result = await super.delete({ id, userId, entity, entityId }); + if (!result.affected) { + throw new BadRequestException('Subscription not found or already deleted'); + } + return result; } catch (error) { throw new BadRequestException('Failed to unsubscribe from entity'); } }
12-17: Consider future ORM migration strategyThe dual repository pattern suggests a transition between ORMs. Consider:
- Documenting the migration strategy
- Adding deprecation notices for the ORM being phased out
- Planning for complete migration to reduce maintenance overhead
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.controller.ts (2)
1-20: LGTM! Well-structured controller setup
The controller implementation follows NestJS best practices with proper guard configuration and dependency injection.
58-72: LGTM! Well-implemented CQRS pattern
The create endpoint correctly implements the command pattern with proper validation and consistent HTTP status codes.
packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts (3)
1-18: LGTM! Well-structured class setup with proper dependency injection
The class is properly set up with:
- Appropriate imports
- Correct decorator usage
- Clean dual repository pattern implementation
48-49: Replace console.log and improve error handling
The error handling needs improvement:
- Replace console.log with proper logging
- Avoid exposing error details in the exception
70-70: Improve error handling in unsubscribe method
Avoid exposing internal error details in the exception.
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit f6d5d77. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 1 targetSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
[Fix] Improve Mention and Subscription APIs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (19)
packages/core/src/mention/dto/mentioned-user-ids.dto.ts (3)
6-6: Enhance API documentation for better type clarity.The @ApiPropertyOptional decorator could be more specific about the array elements being IDs.
-@ApiPropertyOptional({ type: () => Array }) +@ApiPropertyOptional({ type: () => Array, items: { type: () => String }, description: 'Array of user IDs to mention' })
7-9: Consider adding validation for array elements and size.While the current validation ensures the input is an array, consider adding:
- Validation for array elements to ensure they are valid IDs
- Array length constraints to prevent potential abuse
@IsOptional() @IsArray() +@ArrayNotEmpty() +@ArrayMaxSize(100) // Adjust the limit based on your requirements +@IsString({ each: true }) +@IsUUID('4', { each: true }) // If using UUID format mentionIds?: ID[];
5-10: Consider rate limiting and notification strategy for mentions.While the DTO implementation is solid, consider these architectural aspects:
- Implement rate limiting for mentions to prevent spam
- Consider using a queue for processing mentions if notifications are involved
- Think about pagination/batching if dealing with large numbers of mentions
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these architectural improvements?
packages/core/src/comment/dto/create-comment.dto.ts (1)
11-14: Consider implementing robust error handling for invalid mentionsSince this DTO now handles mention IDs, ensure that the service layer implements proper error handling for:
- Non-existent user IDs in mentionIds
- Duplicate mentions
- Permission checks for mentioning users
This will help maintain data integrity and provide better user feedback.
packages/core/src/tasks/dto/create-task.dto.ts (1)
10-15: Consider adding documentation for the mentions feature integration.The integration of mentions into tasks is a significant architectural change. Consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments explaining the mention functionality and usage
- Updating the API documentation to reflect the new mention capabilities
- Creating usage examples for other developers
Example documentation to add above the class:
/** * Create task validation request DTO + * + * @remarks + * This DTO supports user mentions in tasks through the MentionedUserIdsDTO. + * Example usage: + * ```typescript + * { + * title: "Task title", + * description: "Task with @user mention", + * mentionedUserIds: ["userId1", "userId2"] + * } + * ``` */packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts (2)
1-1: Good architectural improvement!Extending
IBasePerEntityTypeinstead of declaring entity properties directly promotes code reuse and maintains consistency with the base entity pattern.Also applies to: 4-4
9-10: Consider enforcing property relationshipWhile the parent entity properties are well-documented, their optional nature could lead to inconsistent states where one is set without the other. Consider using a union type to enforce their relationship:
export interface IMention extends IBasePerTenantAndOrganizationEntityModel, IBasePerEntityType { // ... other properties parent?: { entityId: ID; entityType: BaseEntityEnum; } }packages/core/src/mention/mention.module.ts (1)
15-24: Consider breaking down the module's responsibilitiesThe module has multiple responsibilities:
- Mention entity management (via two ORMs)
- Event handling (via CqrsModule)
- Role permissions
- Subscriptions
This violates the Single Responsibility Principle and could make the module harder to maintain.
Consider:
- Creating separate modules for different concerns
- Using a facade pattern to coordinate between modules
- Documenting the relationships between these components
Would you like assistance in designing a more modular architecture?
packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts (2)
24-30: Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentationThe interface structure looks good with the addition of mention support. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of each field, especially for the newly added mention functionality.
+/** + * Interface for creating a new comment + * @property comment - The content of the comment + * @property parentId - Optional ID of the parent comment for replies + * @property members - Optional array of employees to be assigned + * @property teams - Optional array of teams to be assigned + * @property mentionIds - Array of user IDs that are mentioned in the comment + */ export interface ICommentCreateInput extends IBasePerEntityType, IMentionedUserIds {
Base interface changes require updates to Comment entity implementation
The verification reveals that while
ICommentnow extendsIBasePerEntityType, the actual implementation inpackages/core/src/comment/comment.entity.tsstill has directentityandentityIdproperties instead of inheriting them through the base interface. This needs to be addressed for consistency.
packages/core/src/comment/comment.entity.ts: Update the Comment class to properly implementIBasePerEntityTypeinterface instead of declaring direct properties- The rest of the codebase (services, controllers) is already using these properties correctly
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
7-23: Verify the impact of base interface changesThe interface now extends
IBasePerEntityTypeinstead of having directentityandentityIdproperties. While this is a good refactor, we should verify that all implementations and usages have been updated accordingly.
Let me gather more information about the implementation details to verify the impact of base interface changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any direct usage of entity/entityId properties that might need updates # Search for direct property access that might need updating rg -t ts "comment\.(entity|entityId)[^A-Za-z]" --glob '!*.test.ts' --glob '!*.spec.ts' # Look for potential implementations of IComment that might need updates ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $$$IComment$$$'Length of output: 914
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of Comment entity and its properties ast-grep --pattern 'class Comment { $$$ entity$_?: $_ $$$ }' # Check for any remaining references to entity/entityId in comment-related files rg -t ts "(entity|entityId).*:" packages/core/src/comment/ # Check the base interfaces to understand the inheritance rg -t ts "interface IBasePerEntityType" -A 5Length of output: 1165
packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts (2)
28-38: Well-documented addition with clear purposeThe
parentEntityIdproperty is well-implemented with proper documentation explaining its purpose for subscription and notification handling. The implementation follows best practices with proper validation decorators and database indexing.Consider implementing an event-driven subscription system that:
- Listens for mention events
- Uses the parentEntityId to create appropriate subscriptions
- Implements a notification aggregation strategy to prevent notification spam when multiple mentions occur in the same parent entity
Line range hint
1-93: Solid entity design for hierarchical mention trackingThe overall implementation provides a robust foundation for tracking mentions in a hierarchical context. The combination of
entityId,parentEntityId, andparentEntityTypeenables flexible mention tracking across different entity types while maintaining referential integrity.Consider implementing the following patterns to maximize the effectiveness of this design:
- Use composite indexes on (parentEntityId, parentEntityType) for efficient querying
- Implement a caching strategy for frequently accessed mention hierarchies
- Consider adding a denormalized
pathcolumn if you need to query entire mention chains efficientlypackages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts (1)
62-66: Consider enhancing documentation with JSDoc.The interface implementation looks good, but could benefit from more detailed JSDoc documentation to improve IDE integration and developer experience.
Consider adding this documentation:
+/** + * Represents a base structure for generic entities, linking their unique ID with their type. + * @interface IBasePerEntityType + * @property {ID} entityId - Unique identifier of the referenced entity + * @property {BaseEntityEnum} entity - Type of the referenced entity + */ export interface IBasePerEntityType { entityId: ID; entity: BaseEntityEnum; }packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts (1)
92-144: Consider breaking down the complex logic into smaller functionsThe updateEntityMentions method handles multiple responsibilities. Consider extracting the mention synchronization logic into separate methods for better maintainability.
Consider refactoring like this:
private async getExistingMentions(entity: BaseEntityEnum, entityId: ID): Promise<Set<ID>> { const mentions = await this.find({ where: { entity, entityId }, select: ['mentionedUserId'] }); return new Set(mentions.map((mention) => mention.mentionedUserId)); } private async addNewMentions( mentionsToAdd: ID[], entity: BaseEntityEnum, entityId: ID, actorId: ID, parentEntityId?: ID, parentEntityType?: BaseEntityEnum ): Promise<void> { if (mentionsToAdd.length === 0) return; await Promise.all( mentionsToAdd.map((mentionedUserId) => this.publishMention({ entity, entityId, mentionedUserId, mentionById: actorId, parentEntityId, parentEntityType }) ) ); } private async removeOldMentions( mentionsToRemove: ID[], entity: BaseEntityEnum, entityId: ID ): Promise<void> { if (mentionsToRemove.length === 0) return; await this.delete({ mentionedUserId: In(mentionsToRemove), entity, entityId }); }packages/core/src/tasks/task.service.ts (2)
111-114: Consider adding validation and error handling for mentionsWhile the mention synchronization logic is good, consider these improvements:
- Validate mentionIds before processing
- Add specific error handling for mention sync failures
- Consider if mentions should be synced in other scenarios besides description changes
// Synchronize mentions if (data.description) { + // Validate mentionIds + if (mentionIds && !Array.isArray(mentionIds)) { + throw new BadRequestException('mentionIds must be an array'); + } + try { await this.mentionService.updateEntityMentions(BaseEntityEnum.Task, id, mentionIds); + } catch (error) { + throw new HttpException( + { message: 'Failed to sync mentions', error }, + HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR + ); + } }
116-117: TODO: Implement assignee subscription logicThere are two TODO comments related to assignee subscriptions. This appears to be part of a larger feature for managing task subscriptions.
Would you like me to help implement the subscription logic for assignees? I can:
- Create a TaskSubscriptionService
- Implement subscribe/unsubscribe methods
- Open a GitHub issue to track this enhancement
Also applies to: 629-630
packages/core/src/comment/comment.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
65-68: Replace 'console.log' with Proper Logging and Avoid Exposing Raw ErrorsIn the
catchblock of thecreatemethod, usingconsole.log(error)is not recommended for production code. It's better to use a proper logging service, such as NestJS's built-inLogger. Additionally, including the rawerrorobject in theBadRequestExceptionmay expose sensitive information to the client.Apply this diff to improve error handling:
} catch (error) { - console.log(error); // Debug Logging - throw new BadRequestException('Comment post failed', error); + this.logger.error('Comment post failed', { error }); + throw new BadRequestException('Comment post failed'); }packages/core/src/tasks/commands/handlers/task-create.handler.ts (2)
1-1: Clarify the naming of EventBus instances to avoid confusionThe code imports two EventBus instances: one from
'@nestjs/cqrs'asCqrsEventBus, and another from'../../../event-bus'asEventBus. In the constructor, they are injected as_cqrsEventBusand_eventBusrespectively. This could cause confusion due to similar naming. Consider renaming the variables or adding comments to differentiate between the two event buses.Also applies to: 9-9, 22-22
106-106: Offer assistance in completing the TODO: Subscribe assigneesThere's a TODO comment indicating that assignees should also be subscribed to the task. Would you like assistance in implementing this functionality? I can help generate the required code to subscribe assignees to the task.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts(2 hunks)packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts(2 hunks)packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/contracts/src/subscription.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/contracts/src/task.model.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/comment/comment.service.ts(5 hunks)packages/core/src/comment/dto/create-comment.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/comment/dto/update-comment.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732775571004-AtlerMentionTableAddParentEntityFields.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/dto/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/dto/mentioned-user-ids.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.module.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/tasks/commands/handlers/task-create.handler.ts(5 hunks)packages/core/src/tasks/dto/create-task.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/tasks/task.service.ts(6 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/core/src/comment/dto/update-comment.dto.ts
- packages/core/src/mention/dto/index.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/contracts/src/subscription.model.ts
- packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.service.ts
🔇 Additional comments (31)
packages/core/src/mention/dto/mentioned-user-ids.dto.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Well-structured imports with proper validation and documentation.
The imports demonstrate good practices by including:
- API documentation support via Swagger
- Input validation via class-validator
- Type safety through proper interface implementation
packages/core/src/comment/dto/create-comment.dto.ts (2)
3-4: LGTM! Imports are properly structured.
The imports are correctly organized and the new MentionedUserIdsDTO import aligns with the mention functionality requirements.
11-14: Well-structured DTO composition using IntersectionType!
The nested IntersectionType approach effectively combines the base DTO, Comment entity fields, and mention functionality while maintaining proper separation of concerns.
Let's verify the validation setup and impact on existing flows:
✅ Verification successful
Validation and usage patterns are properly implemented
The verification shows:
- MentionedUserIdsDTO has proper validation decorators (@IsOptional, @isarray) for the mentionIds field
- CreateCommentDTO is correctly used in:
- Comment controller's create endpoint via CommentCreateCommand
- As a base for UpdateCommentDTO with appropriate field omissions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for validation decorators in MentionedUserIdsDTO
echo "Checking MentionedUserIdsDTO validation:"
rg -A 5 "class MentionedUserIdsDTO"
# Verify existing comment creation usage
echo "Checking existing comment creation flows:"
rg -A 10 "CreateCommentDTO" --type ts
Length of output: 3729
packages/core/src/tasks/dto/create-task.dto.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.
The imports are clean and properly structured, with the new MentionedUserIdsDTO import supporting the mentions feature integration.
10-15: Verify the impact of MentionedUserIdsDTO integration.
The type composition looks correct, but let's verify:
- That all required mention-related fields are properly inherited
- The impact on existing task creation flows
Let's check the implementation details and usage:
✅ Verification successful
MentionedUserIdsDTO integration is properly implemented and safe to use
The verification shows that:
- MentionedUserIdsDTO is correctly implemented with an optional
mentionIdsarray property - It's properly imported in both task and comment DTOs
- The task creation flows in various services handle the task creation without any specific mention-related issues
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check MentionedUserIdsDTO implementation
echo "Checking MentionedUserIdsDTO implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class MentionedUserIdsDTO {
$$$
}'
# Check existing task creation usage
echo "\nChecking task creation endpoints:"
ast-grep --pattern 'async createTask($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check if there are any existing tests that need updating
echo "\nChecking related test files:"
fd "task.*spec.ts$" | xargs rg "createTask"
Length of output: 408
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find MentionedUserIdsDTO
echo "Searching for MentionedUserIdsDTO definition:"
rg "class MentionedUserIdsDTO" -A 5
# Find imports of MentionedUserIdsDTO
echo "\nChecking imports of MentionedUserIdsDTO:"
rg "import.*MentionedUserIdsDTO"
# Find task creation controller/service methods
echo "\nChecking task creation implementations:"
rg "createTask.*\{" -A 10
# Find task creation tests
echo "\nChecking task creation tests:"
rg "describe.*Task" -A 5 ".*spec.ts$"
Length of output: 11582
packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts (2)
4-4: Verify migration from direct properties to IBasePerEntityType
The removal of direct entityId and entity properties in favor of extending IBasePerEntityType needs verification across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate one more verification script to check the entity implementation since the previous search didn't show the actual Mention entity implementation.
Migration from direct properties to IBasePerEntityType is correctly implemented
The verification shows that the entityId and entity properties are still directly implemented in the Mention entity class, and they match the properties defined in IBasePerEntityType. The implementation is correct and maintains backward compatibility while extending the interface.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of removed properties
rg "mention.*entityId|mention.*entity[^T]" -A 5
# Search for Mention entity implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements IMention {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 27394
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Mention entity implementation
cat packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts
Length of output: 2972
15-17: Clarify interface purpose and improve type safety
The IMentionedUserIds interface could benefit from:
- Documentation explaining its purpose and usage context
- Renaming for clarity (property name suggests mention IDs but interface name suggests user IDs)
- Consider making the array non-optional with an empty array default
packages/core/src/mention/mention.module.ts (1)
16-17:
Consider consolidating ORM usage for the Mention entity
Using both ORMs for the same entity might lead to conflicts or inconsistent data handling.
Choose one ORM and remove the other:
imports: [
TypeOrmModule.forFeature([Mention]),
- MikroOrmModule.forFeature([Mention]),
CqrsModule,
RolePermissionModule,
SubscriptionModule
],Also update the exports accordingly:
exports: [
TypeOrmModule,
- MikroOrmModule,
MentionService,
TypeOrmMentionRepository
]packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM! Clean import organization
The addition of IMentionedUserIds import supports the new mention functionality while maintaining clean import organization.
31-33: Verify mention handling during updates
The interface structure looks good. The extension of IMentionedUserIds and use of Partial and Omit utility types is appropriate for update operations.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the comment update implementation in packages/core/src/comment/comment.service.ts properly handles mentions during updates. The service:
- Accepts
mentionIdsfrom the update input - Creates an updated comment with the new data
- Synchronizes mentions after the update using the comment's entity and entityId
The interface structure aligns with this implementation, making it safe for handling mentions during updates.
Mention handling during updates is properly implemented
The interface correctly extends IMentionedUserIds and the comment service implementation shows proper synchronization of mentions after updates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of comment updates with mentions
# Look for the update implementation to ensure proper mention handling
rg -t ts "updateComment|update.*Comment" -A 5
# Check for any mention-related event handling in updates
ast-grep --pattern 'async update$_($$$) {
$$$
mention
$$$
}'
Length of output: 49967
packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts (2)
19-19: LGTM! Type change improves type safety
The change from string to ID type for entityId is a good improvement that ensures better type safety and consistency across the codebase.
40-45: LGTM! Proper enum typing for parent entity type
The parentEntityType property is well-implemented using BaseEntityEnum with proper validation decorators. This complements the parentEntityId to create a type-safe parent entity reference.
Let's verify that the BaseEntityEnum includes all necessary entity types for parent references:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! BaseEntityEnum covers all necessary parent entity types
The implementation is verified and correct. The BaseEntityEnum includes a comprehensive set of entity types (Candidate, Contact, Task, Organization, etc.) that can serve as parent entities. The usage pattern in the codebase confirms proper implementation:
- Used in mention creation through
MentionService - Properly integrated with comments system for parent entity tracking
- Well-documented in the contracts with clear purpose (e.g., for subscription and notifications)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check BaseEntityEnum values to ensure all potential parent entity types are covered
# Search for BaseEntityEnum definition
rg -A 20 "export enum BaseEntityEnum"
# Search for actual usage of parent entity types in the codebase
rg "parentEntityType.*=.*BaseEntityEnum\."
Length of output: 1705
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for actual usage of mentions with parent entities to understand the implementation patterns
# Search for mentions with parent entities in the codebase
rg -B 2 -A 2 "parentEntityType.*[:|=].*"
# Search for any tests or documentation related to mentions with parent entities
rg -l "mention.*parent.*entity"
# Search for any service/repository usage of parent entity type in mentions
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
parentEntityType
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2090
packages/contracts/src/task.model.ts (2)
18-18: Verify the mention model interface
The import statement looks correct. Let's verify the existence and interface of the mention model.
✅ Verification successful
Import statement is valid and correctly references the interface
The verification confirms that:
- The
mention.model.tsfile exists in the same directory - The
IMentionedUserIdsinterface is properly defined with an optionalmentionIdsproperty of typeID[] - The import statement follows TypeScript conventions and references a valid interface
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the mention model file and interface
# Check if the mention model exists and contains the IMentionedUserIds interface
fd "mention.model.ts" --type f --exec ast-grep --pattern 'interface IMentionedUserIds {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 284
79-79: Interface extension looks good, verify task creation implementations
The change from type alias to interface and extending both ITask and IMentionedUserIds follows TypeScript best practices. This modification properly integrates mention functionality into task creation.
✅ Verification successful
Interface extension is safe to use
The verification shows that the ITaskCreateInput interface is properly implemented across the codebase:
- The DTO in
packages/core/src/tasks/dto/create-task.dto.tscorrectly implementsITaskCreateInput - All task creation implementations in services (
tasks.service.ts,tasks-store.service.ts, etc.) useITaskwhich is compatible with the extended interface - The interface is imported and used correctly in command handlers and event bus
- No breaking changes are introduced as the extension only adds the mention functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify task creation implementations to ensure they handle the new interface
# Look for task creation implementations that need to be updated
rg -t typescript "implements.*ITaskCreateInput|extends.*ITaskCreateInput|new.*ITaskCreateInput|createTask.*Task" -A 5
Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for task creation implementations using different file extensions
rg "implements.*ITaskCreateInput|extends.*ITaskCreateInput|new.*ITaskCreateInput|createTask.*Task" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 5
# Search for files that import ITaskCreateInput
rg "import.*ITaskCreateInput" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"
# Search for task creation method implementations
rg "createTask" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 5
Length of output: 19406
packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts (1)
97-98: Verify enum usage in switch statements.
The addition of Comment to BaseEntityEnum looks good, but we should verify its impact on existing code.
Let's check for switch statements that might need updating:
✅ Verification successful
No switch statements or exhaustive checks affected by the enum change
Based on the comprehensive search results, the BaseEntityEnum is primarily used in:
- Property decorators for type validation (
@IsEnum(BaseEntityEnum)) - Type definitions in entity classes
- Service decorators for favorites
- Interface definitions
There are no switch statements or exhaustive type checks that would be impacted by the addition of the Comment enum value. The enum is used in a type-safe manner through decorators and type definitions, which TypeScript's compiler will handle automatically.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for switch statements using BaseEntityEnum
rg -t typescript "switch.*BaseEntityEnum" -B 2 -A 10
# Search for type guards or exhaustive checks
rg -t typescript "BaseEntityEnum.*type\s+in" -B 2 -A 10
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for switch statements using BaseEntityEnum without file type restriction
rg "switch.*BaseEntityEnum" -B 2 -A 10
# Search for type guards or exhaustive checks
rg "BaseEntityEnum.*type\s+in" -B 2 -A 10
# Search for any usage of BaseEntityEnum
rg "BaseEntityEnum\." -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 13198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for switch statements or type checks using BaseEntityEnum with more context
rg "switch.*\{.*BaseEntityEnum|type.*BaseEntityEnum" -B 5 -A 15
# Search for any exhaustive type checks or enums
ast-grep --pattern 'enum BaseEntityEnum {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 14160
packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts (6)
1-21: LGTM! Clean class setup with proper dependency injection
The class declaration and constructor implementation follow best practices with proper dependency injection and inheritance.
57-59: Critical functionality marked as TODO
The TODO comments indicate missing essential features for email notifications and internal system notifications. These are critical for the proper functioning of a mention system.
31-43: Add input validation
The create method should validate the input entity before processing. Consider adding validation for required fields and data formats.
64-66: Improve error handling implementation
Replace console.log with proper logging service and don't expose the error object in BadRequestException.
75-77: Add error handling and validation to event publishing
The event publishing method should include error handling and input validation to ensure robust operation.
142-143:
Improve error handling in updateEntityMentions
The method currently swallows errors with a console.log, which could hide critical issues.
Apply this diff:
- console.log(error);
+ this.logger.error('Failed to update entity mentions', error);
+ throw new BadRequestException('Failed to update entity mentions');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/core/src/tasks/task.service.ts (3)
34-34: LGTM: Clean dependency injection
The addition of MentionService follows proper dependency injection patterns and is correctly imported.
Also applies to: 50-50
67-67: LGTM: Clean task update logic
The task update logic is well-structured, properly handling the data object and organizationSprintId.
Also applies to: 74-74, 93-93, 98-98
34-34: Verify MentionService integration
Let's verify that the MentionService is properly integrated and all necessary dependencies are in place.
Also applies to: 50-50, 111-114
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can generate the final response as the integration appears to be properly set up:
MentionService integration is properly configured
The service is correctly integrated across the codebase with:
- Properly exported from
mention.module.tsandmention.service.ts - Correctly imported and injected in dependent services:
- TaskService
- TaskCreateHandler
- CommentService
- Required interfaces (IMention, IMentionedUserIds) are defined and used in relevant models
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify MentionService integration
# Check if MentionService is properly exported and available
rg -l "export.*MentionService"
# Check for other usages of MentionService
rg "MentionService" -A 3
# Check for mention-related interfaces
rg "interface.*Mention" -A 5
Length of output: 7099
packages/core/src/comment/comment.service.ts (6)
17-18: Dependency Injection Implemented Correctly
The injection of UserService and MentionService into the constructor is properly implemented, facilitating the use of these services within the CommentService.
33-60: Proper Handling of Mentions in 'create' Method
The create method correctly extracts mentionIds from the input and processes mentions appropriately. The use of Promise.all with mentionIds.map ensures that all mentions are published asynchronously and efficiently.
72-74: Documentation Comments Updated Appropriately
The JSDoc comments for the update method have been updated to clarify the parameters and return types, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
79-80: Extraction of 'mentionIds' from Input in 'update' Method
The update method correctly extracts mentionIds from the input, preparing for mention synchronization. This ensures that any changes to mentions are handled appropriately during an update.
99-105: Mention Synchronization Implemented Correctly in 'update' Method
The update method properly calls this.mentionService.updateEntityMentions to synchronize mentions after updating a comment. The parameters passed ensure that mentions are accurately updated in relation to the comment entity.
98-106:
Ensure Proper Error Handling and Logging in 'update' Method
Similar to the create method, the update method uses console.log(error) in the catch block. Replace this with a proper logging mechanism and avoid including the raw error object in the exception to prevent sensitive information leaks.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
} catch (error) {
- console.log(error); // Debug Logging
- throw new BadRequestException('Comment update failed', error);
+ this.logger.error('Comment update failed', { error });
+ throw new BadRequestException('Comment update failed');
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732775571004-AtlerMentionTableAddParentEntityFields.ts (1)
85-111: Ensure data integrity during SQLite migration
When modifying the mention table in SQLite, the temporary table approach must accurately transfer all existing data, including the new columns. Verify that the new columns parentEntityId and parentEntityType are correctly added and that data migration preserves all records.
Run the following script to confirm that the new columns exist and data is intact:
Replace your_database.sqlite with the path to your SQLite database file.
✅ Verification successful
Migration correctly handles data integrity for new parent entity fields
The migration implementation is correct and maintains data integrity for the following reasons:
- The temporary table approach correctly includes both new columns (
parentEntityIdandparentEntityType) with proper constraints. - The entity definition in
packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.tsshows these fields are optional (?), which aligns with the service implementation where they can be undefined. - The migration handles both SQLite (using temporary table) and MySQL (using direct ALTER TABLE) appropriately.
- The INSERT statement preserves all existing data while the new columns will be populated by the application logic as shown in
mention.service.ts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure and data of the "mention" table after migration.
# Check table schema for new columns
sqlite3 your_database.sqlite "PRAGMA table_info('mention');"
# Verify data count before and after migration
echo "Record count before migration:"
sqlite3 your_database.sqlite "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM temporary_mention;"
echo "Record count after migration:"
sqlite3 your_database.sqlite "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM mention;"
Length of output: 639
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the migration file and related entity definitions to verify the data integrity
# First, let's check if there are any other migration files that might affect the mention table
fd -e ts migration packages/core/src/database/migrations
# Then, let's examine the mention entity definition
fd -g "*mention*.entity.ts" -t f
# Look for any references to parentEntityId and parentEntityType in the codebase
rg "parentEntityId|parentEntityType" -t ts
Length of output: 5767
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732775571004-AtlerMentionTableAddParentEntityFields.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732775571004-AtlerMentionTableAddParentEntityFields.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732775571004-AtlerMentionTableAddParentEntityFields.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
GloireMutaliko21
changed the title
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732775571004-AtlerMentionTableAddParentEntityFields.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732775571004-AtlerMentionTableAddParentEntityFields.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732685369636-CreateSubscriptionTable.ts (3)
14-31: Consider adding try-catch blocks for database-specific operations.While the implementation is correct, adding error handling would make the migration more robust and provide better error messages.
public async up(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> { Logger.debug(yellow(this.name + ' start running!'), 'Migration'); + try { switch (queryRunner.connection.options.type) { case DatabaseTypeEnum.sqlite: case DatabaseTypeEnum.betterSqlite3: await this.sqliteUpQueryRunner(queryRunner); break; case DatabaseTypeEnum.postgres: await this.postgresUpQueryRunner(queryRunner); break; case DatabaseTypeEnum.mysql: await this.mysqlUpQueryRunner(queryRunner); break; default: throw Error(`Unsupported database: ${queryRunner.connection.options.type}`); } + } catch (error) { + Logger.error(`Failed to run migration: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } }
38-53: Maintain consistency with up migration method.Add logging and error handling to match the up migration implementation for consistency.
public async down(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> { + Logger.debug(yellow(this.name + ' start reverting!'), 'Migration'); + try { switch (queryRunner.connection.options.type) { case DatabaseTypeEnum.sqlite: case DatabaseTypeEnum.betterSqlite3: await this.sqliteDownQueryRunner(queryRunner); break; case DatabaseTypeEnum.postgres: await this.postgresDownQueryRunner(queryRunner); break; case DatabaseTypeEnum.mysql: await this.mysqlDownQueryRunner(queryRunner); break; default: throw Error(`Unsupported database: ${queryRunner.connection.options.type}`); } + } catch (error) { + Logger.error(`Failed to revert migration: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } }
193-205: Consider optimizing varchar column lengths.The current implementation uses
varchar(255)for all string columns. Consider using more appropriate lengths based on the expected data:
entityId,entity, andtypemight not need 255 characters- This optimization can improve performance and reduce storage requirements
-\`entityId\` varchar(255) NOT NULL, -\`entity\` varchar(255) NOT NULL, -\`type\` varchar(255) NOT NULL, +\`entityId\` varchar(100) NOT NULL, +\`entity\` varchar(50) NOT NULL, +\`type\` varchar(50) NOT NULL,packages/core/src/comment/comment.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
130-133: Improve error loggingReplace console.log with a proper logging service for better error tracking and debugging in production.
- console.log(error); // Debug Logging + this.logger.error('Comment update failed', { + error: error.message, + stack: error.stack, + commentId: id + });packages/core/src/tasks/commands/handlers/task-create.handler.ts (1)
94-107: Consider implementing assignee subscriptionsThe TODO comment indicates that assignee subscriptions are not yet implemented. This could lead to assignees missing important task updates.
Would you like me to help implement the assignee subscription functionality or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts (1)
56-60: Implement notification functionalityThe TODO comment indicates missing critical functionality for email and system notifications.
Would you like me to help implement the notification system or create GitHub issues to track these tasks:
- Email notification implementation
- Internal system notification implementation
packages/core/src/tasks/task.service.ts (1)
116-117: Implement subscription handling for tasksThere are two pending TODOs for subscription functionality:
- Subscribe assignees to tasks
- Unsubscribe employees from tasks
This functionality is important for proper task management and notifications.
Would you like me to help implement the subscription handling logic? I can provide a complete implementation that:
- Subscribes assignees when they are added to a task
- Unsubscribes users when they are removed from a task
- Handles team-based subscriptions
Also applies to: 629-630
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts(2 hunks)packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/contracts/src/subscription.model.ts(1 hunks)packages/contracts/src/task.model.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/comment/comment.service.ts(5 hunks)packages/core/src/comment/dto/create-comment.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732537145609-CreateMentionTable.ts(10 hunks)packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732685369636-CreateSubscriptionTable.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/dto/mentioned-user-ids.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.controller.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts(2 hunks)packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.entity.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/tasks/commands/handlers/task-create.handler.ts(5 hunks)packages/core/src/tasks/dto/create-task.dto.ts(1 hunks)packages/core/src/tasks/task.service.ts(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- packages/core/src/mention/mention.controller.ts
- packages/core/src/comment/dto/create-comment.dto.ts
- packages/core/src/tasks/dto/create-task.dto.ts
- packages/contracts/src/task.model.ts
- packages/core/src/subscription/subscription.entity.ts
- packages/core/src/mention/dto/mentioned-user-ids.dto.ts
- packages/contracts/src/subscription.model.ts
- packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts
🔇 Additional comments (13)
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732685369636-CreateSubscriptionTable.ts (3)
1-8: LGTM: Class structure and imports are well-organized.
The migration class follows TypeORM conventions and includes all necessary imports.
108-144: Simplify SQLite migration implementation.
The current implementation is unnecessarily complex with temporary tables and index recreation.
60-80: Verify CASCADE delete behavior for all foreign key relationships.
The current implementation uses CASCADE delete for all foreign key relationships. Please verify if this is the intended behavior, especially for the tenant relationship.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the CASCADE delete behavior for tenant relationships is consistently used across multiple tables in the codebase, including changelog, candidate, contact, organization_sprint, mention, employee, subscription, task_status, resource_link, and api_call_log tables. All these tables have foreign key constraints to the tenant table with ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE NO ACTION.
The CASCADE delete behavior for tenant relationships is consistent with the codebase patterns.
The implementation follows the established pattern where:
- All tenant relationships use
ON DELETE CASCADE - All tenant relationships use
ON UPDATE NO ACTION
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if CASCADE delete is consistently used across the codebase for tenant relationships
rg --type ts "FOREIGN KEY.*tenantId.*ON DELETE CASCADE" -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 65604
packages/contracts/src/mention.model.ts (2)
4-11: LGTM! Well-structured parent-child relationship tracking
The addition of parentEntityId and parentEntityType with clear documentation improves the model's ability to track hierarchical relationships between entities. This is particularly useful for subscription and notification purposes.
15-17: Consider a more descriptive interface name
The interface name IMentionUserIds could be more specific to better reflect its purpose, such as IMentionedUsers or IMentionUserList.
packages/core/src/mention/mention.entity.ts (2)
28-38: LGTM! Well-documented parent entity relationship
The implementation includes proper validation decorators and clear documentation explaining the purpose of the parent entity relationship.
40-45: Consider adding nullable flag to parentEntityType
While parentEntityId is properly marked as nullable, ensure consistency by also marking parentEntityType as nullable in the database schema since they form a pair.
packages/core/src/comment/comment.service.ts (1)
115-119:
Fix incorrect use of super.create in update method
Using super.create for updating a comment is incorrect and could lead to unexpected behavior.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- const updatedComment = await super.create({
- ...input,
- id
- });
+ const updatedComment = await super.update(id, input);packages/core/src/tasks/commands/handlers/task-create.handler.ts (1)
80-92: Verify the property name for creator ID
The property task.creatorId might need to be updated if the Task entity uses a different property name (e.g., createdById).
packages/core/src/mention/mention.service.ts (2)
64-65:
Replace console.log with proper logger
Use the NestJS Logger service instead of console.log for proper error logging.
Apply this diff:
-console.log('Error while creating mention:', error);
-throw new BadRequestException('Error while creating mention', error);
+this.logger.error('Error while creating mention', error);
+throw new BadRequestException('Error while creating mention');Likely invalid or redundant comment.
75-77:
Add error handling to event publishing
The event publishing lacks error handling which could lead to silent failures.
Apply this diff:
publishMention(input: IMentionCreateInput) {
+ try {
this._eventBus.publish(new CreateMentionEvent(input));
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Failed to publish mention event', error);
+ throw new BadRequestException('Failed to publish mention event');
+ }
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732537145609-CreateMentionTable.ts (1)
70-71: Verify index name consistency across database types
Ensure that the index names for parent entity columns are consistent across PostgreSQL, SQLite, and MySQL migrations.
Also applies to: 126-127, 154-155
✅ Verification successful
Index names are consistent across database types
After examining the migration file, I can confirm that the index names for parent entity columns (IDX_5b95805861f9de5cf7760a964a for parentEntityId and IDX_4f9397b277ec0791c5f9e2fd62 for parentEntityType) are consistently used across all database types:
- PostgreSQL: Uses the same index names in
postgresUpQueryRunner - SQLite/BetterSQLite3: Uses identical index names in
sqliteUpQueryRunner - MySQL: Uses the same index names in the CREATE TABLE statement within
mysqlUpQueryRunner
The migration properly handles index creation with consistent naming across all supported database types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check index name consistency across database migrations
# Extract and compare index names
echo "PostgreSQL indexes:"
rg -A 1 'CREATE INDEX' | grep 'IDX_.*parent'
echo "\nSQLite indexes:"
rg -A 1 'CREATE INDEX.*parent' | grep 'IDX_.*parent'
echo "\nMySQL indexes:"
rg -A 1 '\`IDX_.*parent' | grep 'IDX_.*parent'
Length of output: 26952
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check index consistency across database types
# by looking at the migration file content more specifically
echo "Checking index creation in CreateMentionTable migration:"
rg -A 2 'CREATE INDEX.*parent.*mention' packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732537145609-CreateMentionTable.ts
echo -e "\nChecking if there are any database-specific conditions:"
rg "if.*getConnection|case.*getConnection" packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732537145609-CreateMentionTable.ts
Length of output: 484
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the entire migration file content to understand the index creation
echo "Examining CreateMentionTable migration file:"
cat packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732537145609-CreateMentionTable.ts
echo -e "\nChecking for any TypeORM database-specific decorators or configurations:"
rg -l "@Index|@Entity" packages/core/src/database/migrations/1732537145609-CreateMentionTable.ts
Length of output: 19176
packages/core/src/tasks/task.service.ts (1)
34-34: LGTM: Clean dependency injection
The MentionService is properly injected following NestJS best practices.
Also applies to: 50-50
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Subscriptionentity and related services.MentionControllerandSubscriptionControllerfor managing mentions and subscriptions via API endpoints.Mentionentity with new properties for better relationship management.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
Database Migrations
mentionandsubscriptiontables, accommodating new properties for better relational management.