[Fix] View and Resource Links Activity Logs #8409
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces extensive changes across multiple files, focusing on renaming the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts (1)
84-86: Summary: New entity types added with potential codebase-wide impactThe addition of
ResourceLinkandTaskViewto theEntityEnumsuggests that these are new entity types being introduced to the system. While the changes here are minimal, they likely have broader implications:
- New or modified database schemas may be required to support these entities.
- Services, repositories, and controllers might need to be created or updated to handle these new entity types.
- Existing code that works with entity types may need to be updated to account for these new options.
Consider the following to ensure smooth integration of these new entity types:
- Update any switch statements or if-else chains that exhaustively handle entity types.
- Ensure proper error handling and validation are in place for these new entity types throughout the codebase.
- Update documentation and API specifications to reflect these new entity types.
- If there's a database migration system in place, create the necessary migration scripts.
Would you like assistance in identifying areas of the codebase that might need updates based on these new entity types?
packages/core/src/organization-sprint/organization-sprint.service.ts (1)
203-206: LGTM: Improved activity logging implementation.The use of
activityLogUpdatedFieldsAndValuessimplifies the code and standardizes the way changes are tracked and logged. This is a positive change that improves maintainability and consistency.Consider using object destructuring for clarity:
const { updatedFields, previousValues, updatedValues } = activityLogUpdatedFieldsAndValues( updatedSprint, input );This makes it clear that we're extracting specific properties from the result of
activityLogUpdatedFieldsAndValues.packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts (1)
79-79: Correct the formatting of the author's name in the JSDoc commentThe static analysis tool reports unknown words "Gloire" and "Mutaliko" on line 79. It appears there's no space between the first and last name in the
@author.Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
- * @author GloireMutaliko + * @author Gloire MutalikoAlternatively, consider adding "Gloire" and "Mutaliko" to the spell checker's dictionary if appropriate.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Cspell
[warning] 79-79:
Unknown word (Gloire)
[warning] 79-79:
Unknown word (Mutaliko)packages/core/src/resource-link/resource-link.service.ts (1)
79-79: Use a proper logging service instead ofconsole.logfor error handlingUsing
console.logfor error logging is not recommended in production environments. Consider injecting a logging service to handle errors more effectively.Apply this change:
- console.log(error); // Debug Logging + // Use a logging service to log errors + this.logger.error('Resource Link creation failed', error);Ensure that you have a logging service (e.g.,
LoggerService) injected into your class:import { Logger } from '@nestjs/common'; @Injectable() export class ResourceLinkService extends TenantAwareCrudService<ResourceLink> { constructor( // existing injections private readonly logger: Logger, // ... ) { super(typeOrmResourceLinkRepository, mikroOrmResourceLinkRepository); } // ... }Also applies to: 136-136
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/core/src/organization-sprint/organization-sprint.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/resource-link/resource-link.service.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/core/src/tasks/views/commands/handlers/task-view-update.handler.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Cspell
packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts
[warning] 79-79:
Unknown word (Gloire)
[warning] 79-79:
Unknown word (Mutaliko)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/core/src/tasks/views/commands/handlers/task-view-update.handler.ts (1)
13-13: LGTM! Verify TaskViewService.update method signature.The change from
createtoupdatealigns the handler's functionality with its nameTaskViewUpdateHandler. This ensures that existing task views are updated rather than new ones being created, which is likely the intended behavior.Please verify that the
updatemethod inTaskViewServiceaccepts two separate parameters (idandinput) as used here. Run the following script to check theTaskViewServiceimplementation:packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts (1)
84-86: LGTM: New entity types added toEntityEnumThe additions of
ResourceLinkandTaskViewto theEntityEnumare correct and consistent with the existing naming convention. These new entity types will likely be used in other parts of the codebase for type checking and identification purposes.To ensure these new entity types are being used correctly in the codebase, let's run a quick check:
This will help us verify that the new enum values are being utilized appropriately in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
EntityEnumAdditions ConfirmedThe additions of
ResourceLinkandTaskViewto theEntityEnumare correctly implemented and actively used within the codebase as evidenced by their presence in the respective service files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new EntityEnum values # Check for ResourceLink usage echo "Checking for ResourceLink usage:" rg --type typescript "EntityEnum\.ResourceLink" -A 3 # Check for TaskView usage echo "Checking for TaskView usage:" rg --type typescript "EntityEnum\.TaskView" -A 3Length of output: 317
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new EntityEnum values without using unsupported type flag # Check for ResourceLink usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Checking for ResourceLink usage in TypeScript files:" rg "EntityEnum\.ResourceLink" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" -A 3 # Check for TaskView usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Checking for TaskView usage in TypeScript files:" rg "EntityEnum\.TaskView" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" -A 3Length of output: 2999
packages/core/src/organization-sprint/organization-sprint.service.ts (1)
22-22: LGTM: Improved activity logging import.The addition of
activityLogUpdatedFieldsAndValuesandgenerateActivityLogDescriptionimports from the activity log helper suggests a positive refactoring to centralize and standardize activity logging functionality. This change should improve code maintainability and consistency across the application.packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts (2)
35-35: Dependency Injection of EventBus is correctly implementedThe
EventBusis properly injected into the constructor asprivate readonly _eventBus: EventBus, allowing for event-driven capabilities within the service.
47-75: Create method is correctly implemented with event publishing and error handlingThe
createmethod effectively handles the creation of a task view, including:
- Retrieving the tenant ID.
- Creating the task view using
super.create.- Generating an activity log description.
- Publishing an
ActivityLogEventto the event bus.- Proper error handling with
HttpException.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts (2)
40-75: LGTM with suggestion: Enhance error handling increatemethodThe
createmethod is well-implemented with proper activity logging and event publishing. However, there's room for improvement in error handling.Consider not exposing the full error message in the
HttpException. Instead, log the full error internally and return a generic message to the client. For example:- throw new HttpException(`Failed to create view : ${error.message}`, HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST); + console.error('Failed to create view:', error); + throw new HttpException('Failed to create view. Please try again later.', HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST);This approach prevents potentially sensitive information from being exposed to the client while still allowing for detailed server-side logging.
Line range hint
1-131: Summary: Good improvements with some issues to addressOverall, the changes to
TaskViewServiceare positive, adding robust error handling, activity logging, and event publishing. However, there are a few key points to address:
The critical issue in the
updatemethod usingsuper.createinstead ofsuper.updatemust be fixed to ensure correct functionality.Error handling in both
createandupdatemethods should be improved to avoid exposing potentially sensitive information in error messages.Consider adding unit tests for the new
createandupdatemethods to ensure they behave as expected, especially after fixing theupdatemethod.To further improve the service:
Consider extracting the activity logging and event publishing logic into a separate method or service to reduce duplication between
createandupdatemethods.Implement input validation to ensure that all required fields are present and valid before attempting to create or update a task view.
Add appropriate authorization checks to ensure that only users with the correct permissions can create or update task views.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts (3)
1-21: LGTM: New imports support enhanced functionalityThe added imports are appropriate for the new features implemented in the service, including event publishing, error handling, and activity logging.
35-35: LGTM: Constructor updated for event publishingThe addition of the
EventBusparameter in the constructor is appropriate for the new event publishing functionality implemented in the service.
77-131:⚠️ Potential issueCritical: Use
super.updateinstead ofsuper.createin theupdatemethodThe
updatemethod is well-structured with proper activity logging and event publishing. However, there are two important issues to address:
- Incorrect use of
super.create:As noted in a previous review,
super.createis being used instead ofsuper.update. This could lead to unintended behavior, such as creating a new task view instead of updating the existing one. Please apply the following fix:- const updatedTaskView = await super.create({ + const updatedTaskView = await super.update(id, { ...input, tenantId, - id });
- Error handling improvement:
Similar to the
createmethod, consider not exposing the full error message in theHttpException. Instead, log the full error internally and return a generic message to the client:- throw new HttpException(`Failed to update view: ${error.message}`, HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST); + console.error('Failed to update view:', error); + throw new HttpException('Failed to update view. Please try again later.', HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST);This approach prevents potentially sensitive information from being exposed to the client while still allowing for detailed server-side logging.
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit ab2c22d. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 6 targetsSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/contracts/src/activity-log.model.ts (1)
1-14: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this file are focused and consistent:
- Updated import statement to use
BaseEntityEnuminstead ofEntityEnum.- Modified the
entityproperty type in theIActivityLoginterface to useBaseEntityEnum.These changes align with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary, which mentioned renaming
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. The modifications don't introduce new logic or alter existing behavior, but they do improve naming consistency.Consider the following recommendations:
- Ensure that all files importing
EntityEnumare updated to useBaseEntityEnum.- Update any documentation or comments that reference
EntityEnumto reflect the new name.- If this is part of a public API, consider adding a deprecation notice for
EntityEnumto maintain backward compatibility, if necessary.- Review and update any unit tests that may be affected by this change.
These steps will help maintain consistency across the codebase and minimize potential issues caused by the renaming.
packages/core/src/resource-link/resource-link.entity.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Summary: Consistent replacement of EntityEnum with BaseEntityEnumThe changes in this file are part of a larger refactoring effort to replace
EntityEnumwithBaseEntityEnum. The modifications are consistent and focused, affecting the import statement, API decorators, and theentityproperty type. These changes may have broader implications:
- API Documentation: The
@ApiPropertydecorator changes may affect the generated API documentation.- Request Validation: The
@IsEnumdecorator update may impact request validation.- Type Safety: The
entityproperty type change ensures type safety with the newBaseEntityEnum.To ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that all occurrences of
EntityEnumhave been replaced throughout the codebase.- Update any API clients that may be affected by these changes.
- Review and update unit tests that involve the
ResourceLinkentity orEntityEnum.- Check for any breaking changes in the
BaseEntityEnumcompared to the oldEntityEnum.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale behind the switch from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum, which could help other developers understand the architectural decision.packages/core/src/tasks/commands/handlers/task-create.handler.ts (2)
98-98: LGTM: Consistent usage of BaseEntityEnum in logging.The change to use
BaseEntityEnum.Taskin the console log statement is correct and maintains consistency with the other changes.Consider using a template literal for better readability:
- console.log( - `Task created with ID: ${task.id} with activity log: ${JSON.stringify({ - entity: BaseEntityEnum.Task, - entityId: task.id, - action: ActionTypeEnum.Created, - actorType: ActorTypeEnum.User, - description, - data: task, - organizationId, - tenantId - })}` - ); + console.log(`Task created with ID: ${task.id} with activity log:`, { + entity: BaseEntityEnum.Task, + entityId: task.id, + action: ActionTypeEnum.Created, + actorType: ActorTypeEnum.User, + description, + data: task, + organizationId, + tenantId + });This change improves readability and allows for better formatting of the logged object in the console.
Line range hint
1-115: Overall assessment: Changes are well-implemented and consistent.The modifications in this file successfully replace
EntityEnumwithBaseEntityEnum, aligning with the reported refactoring effort. The changes are consistent throughout the file and maintain the intended functionality. Good job on implementing these updates!To further improve the codebase:
- Consider adding unit tests to verify the behavior of the
TaskCreateHandler, especially focusing on the usage ofBaseEntityEnum.- Review and update any documentation or comments that might still reference
EntityEnumto ensure complete consistency across the project.packages/core/src/organization-team/organization-team.service.ts (1)
21-21: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this file are limited to:
- Updating the import from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum.- Updating the
@FavoriteServicedecorator to useBaseEntityEnum.OrganizationTeam.These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to rename
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. While the impact on this specific file is minimal, it's crucial to ensure that:
- This refactoring has been consistently applied across the entire codebase.
- The values within
BaseEntityEnumremain consistent with the previousEntityEnum.- Any external dependencies or libraries that might have used
EntityEnumhave been updated accordingly.Consider the following to ensure a smooth transition:
- Update all documentation references from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum.- Review and update any configuration files or build scripts that might reference
EntityEnum.- If this is a published package, consider the impact on dependent projects and plan for a major version bump if the change is breaking.
Also applies to: 44-44
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
- packages/contracts/src/activity-log.model.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/contracts/src/favorite.model.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/core/src/activity-log/activity-log.entity.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/activity-log/activity-log.helper.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/activity-log/activity-log.subscriber.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/activity-log/dto/get-activity-logs.dto.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/comment/comment.entity.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/core/decorators/is-favoritable.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/core/src/favorite/favorite.entity.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/favorite/favorite.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/favorite/global-favorite-service.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/core/src/organization-project/organization-project.service.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/core/src/organization-sprint/organization-sprint.service.ts (5 hunks)
- packages/core/src/organization-team/organization-team.service.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/resource-link/resource-link.entity.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/core/src/resource-link/resource-link.service.ts (4 hunks)
- packages/core/src/tasks/commands/handlers/task-create.handler.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/core/src/tasks/task.service.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/contracts/src/base-entity.model.ts
- packages/core/src/organization-sprint/organization-sprint.service.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (62)
packages/contracts/src/favorite.model.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to include
BaseEntityEnum, which is consistent with the changes made in the interface.
5-5: Verify the impact of changingEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum.The type of the
entityproperty in theIFavoriteinterface has been updated fromEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. This change appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort.Let's verify if this change is consistent across the codebase and if there are any potential issues:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
EntityEnumhas been fully replaced withBaseEntityEnumacross the codebase.All references to
EntityEnumhave been successfully updated toBaseEntityEnum, and no relatedTODOorFIXMEcomments were found. The remaining usage ofReactionEntityEnumappears to be intentional and unrelated to this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of BaseEntityEnum usage and potential issues # Test 1: Check if there are any remaining references to EntityEnum echo "Checking for remaining EntityEnum references:" rg --type typescript "EntityEnum" # Test 2: Verify BaseEntityEnum is used consistently echo "Verifying BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg --type typescript "BaseEntityEnum" # Test 3: Check for any TODO or FIXME comments related to this change echo "Checking for related TODO or FIXME comments:" rg --type typescript -e "TODO.*EntityEnum" -e "FIXME.*EntityEnum" -e "TODO.*BaseEntityEnum" -e "FIXME.*BaseEntityEnum" # Test 4: Look for potential type errors or incompatibilities echo "Checking for potential type errors or incompatibilities:" rg --type typescript "entity:.*EntityEnum"Length of output: 773
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of BaseEntityEnum usage and potential issues # Test 1: Check if there are any remaining references to EntityEnum echo "Checking for remaining EntityEnum references:" rg --type ts --type tsx "EntityEnum" # Test 2: Verify BaseEntityEnum is used consistently echo "Verifying BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx "BaseEntityEnum" # Test 3: Check for any TODO or FIXME comments related to this change echo "Checking for related TODO or FIXME comments:" rg --type ts --type tsx -e "TODO.*EntityEnum" -e "FIXME.*EntityEnum" -e "TODO.*BaseEntityEnum" -e "FIXME.*BaseEntityEnum" # Test 4: Look for potential type errors or incompatibilities echo "Checking for potential type errors or incompatibilities:" rg --type ts --type tsx "entity:.*EntityEnum"Length of output: 757
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of BaseEntityEnum usage and potential issues # Test 1: Check if there are any remaining references to EntityEnum echo "Checking for remaining EntityEnum references:" rg "EntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test 2: Verify BaseEntityEnum is used consistently echo "Verifying BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg "BaseEntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test 3: Check for any TODO or FIXME comments related to this change echo "Checking for related TODO or FIXME comments:" rg -e "TODO.*EntityEnum" -e "FIXME.*EntityEnum" -e "TODO.*BaseEntityEnum" -e "FIXME.*BaseEntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test 4: Look for potential type errors or incompatibilities echo "Checking for potential type errors or incompatibilities:" rg "entity:.*EntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 19126
packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM! Verify the impact on the codebase.The change from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumfor theentityproperty is consistent with the import statement update and maintains the structure of the interface.Let's verify the impact of this change on the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of IResourceLink and its entity property # Test 1: Search for IResourceLink usage echo "IResourceLink usage:" rg --type typescript '\bIResourceLink\b' -g '!packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.ts' # Test 2: Search for specific usage of the entity property echo "\nUsage of entity property:" rg --type typescript 'IResourceLink.*entity' -g '!packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.ts'
2-2: LGTM! Verify the usage ofID.The change from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumis consistent with the PR objectives. The addition ofIDto the import statement is noted.Let's verify the usage of
IDin this file:✅ Verification successful
Usage of
IDVerifiedThe
IDtype is correctly used in theentityIdandcreatorIdproperties.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of ID in the file # Test: Search for ID usage rg --type typescript '\bID\b' packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.tsLength of output: 379
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of ID in the file # Test: Search for ID usage without specifying file type rg '\bID\b' packages/contracts/src/resource-link.model.tsLength of output: 191
packages/core/src/activity-log/activity-log.helper.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-20: Overall assessment: Changes look good and align with the refactoring objectives.The modifications in this file are part of a larger effort to standardize entity enums by replacing
EntityEnumwithBaseEntityEnum. The changes are consistent and don't introduce any logical alterations to the existing functionality. Good job on maintaining the code's integrity while refactoring!
16-20: LGTM! Verify the function usage across the codebase.The function signature has been correctly updated to use
BaseEntityEnuminstead ofEntityEnumfor theentityparameter. This change is consistent with the import statement update and maintains the function's behavior.To ensure that all calls to this function have been updated accordingly, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all calls to generateActivityLogDescription use BaseEntityEnum # Test: Check for function calls to generateActivityLogDescription echo "Checking calls to generateActivityLogDescription:" rg --type typescript "generateActivityLogDescription\s*\(" -A 3Please review the output to ensure that all calls to
generateActivityLogDescriptionare using the correct enum type for theentityparameter.packages/core/src/favorite/favorite.entity.ts (4)
15-15: LGTM. Verify Swagger documentation generation.The
@ApiPropertydecorator has been correctly updated to useBaseEntityEnum. This change is consistent with the overall modification.To ensure that the Swagger documentation is generated correctly with this change, please verify the following:
- Rebuild the API documentation.
- Check that the
entityproperty in theFavoriteentity is correctly documented with theBaseEntityEnumoptions in the Swagger UI.If you need assistance with this verification, please let me know, and I can provide a script to automate part of this process.
Line range hint
1-58: Overall LGTM. Verify broader impact of EntityEnum to BaseEntityEnum refactoring.The changes in this file are consistent and correctly implement the replacement of
EntityEnumwithBaseEntityEnum. This appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort.To ensure the consistency and correctness of this refactoring across the entire codebase, consider the following steps:
- Run a global search for any remaining instances of
EntityEnumto ensure complete replacement.- Verify that all files importing from
@gauzy/contractshave been updated to useBaseEntityEnumwhere necessary.- Run the entire test suite to catch any potential breaking changes introduced by this refactoring.
- Review the API documentation to ensure it reflects the changes accurately.
If you need assistance in creating scripts or workflows to automate these verification steps, please let me know.
5-5: LGTM. Verify consistency of import across the codebase.The import statement has been correctly updated to include
BaseEntityEnum. This change aligns with the replacement ofEntityEnumwithBaseEntityEnum.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Import Consistency Verified
All imports of
EntityEnumhave been successfully replaced withBaseEntityEnum. No remaining imports ofEntityEnumwere found across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of BaseEntityEnum import across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of EntityEnum echo "Checking for any remaining imports of EntityEnum:" rg --type typescript "import.*EntityEnum.*from.*@gauzy/contracts" # Test 2: Verify the correct import of BaseEntityEnum echo "Verifying the correct import of BaseEntityEnum:" rg --type typescript "import.*BaseEntityEnum.*from.*@gauzy/contracts"Length of output: 423
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of BaseEntityEnum import across the codebase with correct file type matching # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of EntityEnum echo "Checking for any remaining imports of EntityEnum:" rg "import.*EntityEnum.*from.*@gauzy/contracts" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test 2: Verify the correct import of BaseEntityEnum echo "Verifying the correct import of BaseEntityEnum:" rg "import.*BaseEntityEnum.*from.*@gauzy/contracts" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 3310
17-20: LGTM. Verify impact on existing code.The
@IsEnumdecorator and theentityproperty type have been correctly updated to useBaseEntityEnum. These changes are consistent with the overall modification.To ensure that these changes don't break any existing functionality or type checks, run the following script:
Please review the results of this script and address any issues found. If you need assistance interpreting the results or fixing any problems, please let me know.
packages/contracts/src/activity-log.model.ts (1)
14-14: LGTM! Verify implementations ofIActivityLoginterface.The
entityproperty in theIActivityLoginterface has been updated to useBaseEntityEnuminstead ofEntityEnum. This change is consistent with the import statement modification and ensures type consistency throughout the codebase.To ensure this change doesn't break any existing implementations of the
IActivityLoginterface, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for implementations of IActivityLog interface and verify entity property usage # Test 1: Find implementations of IActivityLog echo "Searching for implementations of IActivityLog:" rg --type typescript "implements\s+IActivityLog" # Test 2: Check entity property usage in these implementations echo "Checking entity property usage in IActivityLog implementations:" rg --type typescript "entity\s*:\s*BaseEntityEnum" -C 5This script will help identify implementations of the
IActivityLoginterface and verify that they are using theBaseEntityEnumfor theentityproperty.packages/core/src/activity-log/dto/get-activity-logs.dto.ts (4)
21-21: LGTM. API documentation updated correctly.The
@ApiPropertyOptionaldecorator has been properly updated to useBaseEntityEnum, ensuring consistency with the import change and maintaining accurate API documentation.
Line range hint
3-24: Overall assessment: Changes are consistent and well-implemented.The modifications in this file are part of a larger refactoring effort to rename
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. All changes have been implemented consistently and correctly, maintaining type safety and proper validation. The updates to imports, decorators, and property types are in line with the reported modifications in the AI summary.To ensure a smooth transition, it's recommended to:
- Verify that all occurrences of
EntityEnumhave been replaced withBaseEntityEnumacross the entire codebase.- Update any related documentation or comments that might still reference
EntityEnum.- Ensure that any external dependencies or integrations that might rely on the
EntityEnumare also updated accordingly.
3-3: LGTM. Verify the import change across the codebase.The import statement has been correctly updated to use
BaseEntityEnuminstead ofEntityEnum. This change is consistent with the reported modifications.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script to check for any remaining
EntityEnumimports:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining EntityEnum imports that might need updating # Test: Search for EntityEnum imports rg --type typescript 'import.*EntityEnum.*from.*@gauzy/contracts'
23-24: LGTM. Verify enum usage across the codebase.The
@IsEnumdecorator andentityproperty type have been correctly updated to useBaseEntityEnum. These changes maintain consistency with the import modification and ensure proper type checking and validation.To ensure all usages of the enum have been updated, run the following script:
packages/core/src/favorite/global-favorite-service.service.ts (5)
9-9: Approve serviceMap type update.The change in the
serviceMaptype fromMap<EntityEnum, any>toMap<BaseEntityEnum, any>is consistent with the import modification and maintains type consistency within the class.
47-47: Approve method signature updates for getService and callMethod.The changes in the
typeparameter fromEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumin bothgetServiceandcallMethodmethods are consistent with the previous modifications and maintain type consistency across the class methods.Also applies to: 51-51
Line range hint
1-62: Summary of changes: Consistent refactoring from EntityEnum to BaseEntityEnum.The changes in this file represent a consistent refactoring from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. This includes updates to:
- Import statement
serviceMaptypeextractTypeFromProvidermethod return typegetServiceandcallMethodmethod parameter typesThese modifications maintain type consistency throughout the
GlobalFavoriteDiscoveryServiceclass without altering its logic or functionality. The refactoring appears to be part of a larger effort to update the entity type representation across the application.To ensure the changes have been applied consistently across the codebase, consider running a comprehensive search for any remaining instances of
EntityEnumand update them if necessary.
42-42: Approve method signature update and verify metadata type.The change in the return type of
extractTypeFromProviderfromEntityEnum | nulltoBaseEntityEnum | nullis consistent with the previous modifications and maintains type consistency.To ensure the
FAVORITABLE_TYPEmetadata is now of typeBaseEntityEnum, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of FAVORITABLE_TYPE decorator # Search for FAVORITABLE_TYPE decorator usage rg --type typescript 'FAVORITABLE_TYPE' -C 5Review the results to confirm that the
FAVORITABLE_TYPEdecorator is now being used withBaseEntityEnumvalues.
4-4: Approve import change and verify its impact.The change from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumis consistent with the overall modifications. This update likely reflects a more appropriate or updated naming convention.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining usages of
EntityEnum:If the script returns any results, those occurrences may need to be updated to use
BaseEntityEnumas well.✅ Verification successful
Import change verified successfully.
All instances of
EntityEnumhave been replaced withBaseEntityEnum, and no remaining usages ofEntityEnumwere found in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of EntityEnum in the codebase # Search for EntityEnum in all TypeScript files rg --type typescript 'EntityEnum'Length of output: 173
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of EntityEnum in the codebase # Search for EntityEnum in all TypeScript files rg --type ts 'EntityEnum'Length of output: 8445
packages/core/src/resource-link/resource-link.entity.ts (2)
20-20: LGTM. Verify property usage across the codebase.The
entityproperty type has been correctly updated fromEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. This change is consistent with the previous modifications in the file.To ensure consistent usage of the
entityproperty with its new type across the codebase, run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the entity property with BaseEntityEnum type # Test 1: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum for entity properties echo "Checking for any remaining EntityEnum usage for entity properties:" rg --type typescript "entity:.*EntityEnum" || echo "No EntityEnum usage found for entity properties." # Test 2: Verify the correct usage of BaseEntityEnum for entity properties echo "Verifying correct usage of BaseEntityEnum for entity properties:" rg --type typescript "entity:.*BaseEntityEnum" # Test 3: Check for any usage of the entity property in other files echo "Checking usage of the entity property in other files:" rg --type typescript "\.entity\b"
15-17: LGTM. Verify API documentation and request validation.The
ApiPropertyandIsEnumdecorators have been correctly updated to useBaseEntityEnum. This ensures consistency with the import changes and updates the API documentation and request validation.To verify the impact on API documentation and request validation, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified. All usages of
EntityEnumhave been successfully replaced withBaseEntityEnumin API decorators and controllers, ensuring consistency and correctness across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of BaseEntityEnum in API decorators and controllers # Test 1: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum in API decorators echo "Checking for any remaining EntityEnum usage in API decorators:" rg --type typescript "@ApiProperty.*EntityEnum" || echo "No EntityEnum usage found in API decorators." # Test 2: Verify the correct usage of BaseEntityEnum in API decorators echo "Verifying correct usage of BaseEntityEnum in API decorators:" rg --type typescript "@ApiProperty.*BaseEntityEnum" # Test 3: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum in controllers echo "Checking for any remaining EntityEnum usage in controllers:" rg --type typescript --glob "**/*.controller.ts" "EntityEnum" || echo "No EntityEnum usage found in controllers."Length of output: 945
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of BaseEntityEnum in API decorators and controllers # Test 1: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum in API decorators echo "Checking for any remaining EntityEnum usage in API decorators:" rg "@ApiProperty.*EntityEnum" --glob "*.ts" || echo "No EntityEnum usage found in API decorators." # Test 2: Verify the correct usage of BaseEntityEnum in API decorators echo "Verifying correct usage of BaseEntityEnum in API decorators:" rg "@ApiProperty.*BaseEntityEnum" --glob "*.ts" # Test 3: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum in controllers echo "Checking for any remaining EntityEnum usage in controllers:" rg "EntityEnum" --glob "*.controller.ts" || echo "No EntityEnum usage found in controllers."Length of output: 1790
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Accurately check for any remaining usage of the old EntityEnum in API decorators and controllers # Test 1: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum in API decorators (exact match) echo "Checking for any remaining usage of EntityEnum in API decorators:" rg '@ApiProperty.*\bEntityEnum\b' --glob '*.ts' || echo "No EntityEnum usage found in API decorators." # Test 2: Verify the correct usage of BaseEntityEnum in API decorators echo "Verifying correct usage of BaseEntityEnum in API decorators:" rg '@ApiProperty.*\bBaseEntityEnum\b' --glob '*.ts' # Test 3: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum in controllers (exact match) echo "Checking for any remaining usage of EntityEnum in controllers:" rg '\bEntityEnum\b' --glob '*.controller.ts' || echo "No EntityEnum usage found in controllers."Length of output: 1277
packages/core/src/activity-log/activity-log.entity.ts (4)
15-15: LGTM! API property correctly updated.The @ApiProperty decorator has been properly updated to use
BaseEntityEnum, maintaining consistency with the import changes and ensuring accurate API documentation.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall assessment: Changes look good and maintain consistency.The refactoring from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumhas been applied correctly and consistently throughout the file. The changes maintain the integrity of theActivityLogentity and improve type consistency. No other parts of the file were affected by this change, which is a positive sign.To ensure the refactoring is complete:
- Verify that
BaseEntityEnumis correctly defined in the@gauzy/contractspackage.- Check other files in the project for any remaining usages of
EntityEnumthat might need to be updated.- Update any related documentation or comments that might reference the old enum name.
17-17: LGTM! Enum usage and property type correctly updated.The @IsEnum decorator and the
entityproperty type have been properly updated to useBaseEntityEnum. These changes maintain consistency with the import modifications and ensure correct type validation.To ensure all usages of the enum have been updated, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of EntityEnum rg --type typescript "EntityEnum" -g '!**/activity-log.entity.ts'Also applies to: 20-20
6-6: LGTM! Verify the import change across the codebase.The import statement has been correctly updated to include
BaseEntityEnuminstead ofEntityEnum. This change is consistent with the refactoring in the rest of the file.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script to check for any remaining imports of
EntityEnum:✅ Verification successful
Verified! All instances of
EntityEnumhave been successfully replaced withBaseEntityEnumacross the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports of EntityEnum rg --type typescript "import.*EntityEnum.*from '@gauzy/contracts'" -g '!**/activity-log.entity.ts'Length of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports of EntityEnum rg --type ts "import.*EntityEnum.*from '@gauzy/contracts'" -g '!**/activity-log.entity.ts'Length of output: 1464
packages/core/src/tasks/views/view.service.ts (5)
1-25: LGTM: New imports and updated decoratorThe new imports are appropriate for the added functionality, and the update to the
@FavoriteServicedecorator reflects the enum refactoring fromEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum.
28-37: LGTM: Constructor updated with EventBusThe addition of the
EventBusparameter in the constructor is appropriate for the new event publishing functionality implemented in thecreateandupdatemethods.
39-78: LGTM: Well-implemented create methodThe new
createmethod is well-structured with proper error handling, activity logging, and event publishing. The use ofRequestContextfor obtaining the tenant ID is appropriate, and the method follows good practices for creating and logging new entities.
1-134: Overall improvements with one critical issueThe changes to
TaskViewServicesignificantly enhance its functionality and maintainability:
- Improved error handling with
HttpException.- Integration of
EventBusfor activity logging.- New
createandupdatemethods with comprehensive implementation.These improvements will lead to better traceability and robustness of the service. However, please ensure to address the critical issue in the
updatemethod as mentioned in the previous comment.Great job on the overall improvements!
80-134:⚠️ Potential issueFix: Use
super.updateinstead ofsuper.createin the update methodThe implementation of the
updatemethod is generally good, with proper error handling and activity logging. However, there's a critical issue that needs to be addressed:In the
updatemethod,super.createis being called instead ofsuper.update. This could lead to unintended behavior, such as creating a new task view instead of updating the existing one.Please apply the following fix:
- const updatedTaskView = await super.create({ + const updatedTaskView = await super.update(id, { ...input, tenantId, - id });This change ensures that the existing task view is updated correctly using the
super.updatemethod.packages/core/src/resource-link/resource-link.service.ts (5)
1-16: LGTM: Import statements and enum updates look good.The new imports for
EventBus,ActivityLogEvent, and activity log helper functions are correctly added to support the new activity logging functionality. The rename ofEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumis consistent with the changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
27-28: LGTM: Constructor update for EventBus injection.The addition of
EventBusin the constructor is correct and follows dependency injection best practices. This change is necessary to support the new activity logging functionality.
52-66: LGTM: Activity logging added to create method.The implementation of activity logging in the
createmethod looks correct and consistent. The use ofgenerateActivityLogDescriptionandlogActivitymethods ensures proper logging of the creation action. The use ofBaseEntityEnum.ResourceLinkis consistent with the enum rename.
123-146: LGTM: New logActivity method looks good.The new
logActivitymethod is well-implemented and encapsulates the logic for creating and publishing activity log events. This is a good practice for code reusability and consistency across the service. The use ofEventBusto publish theActivityLogEventis correct and aligns with the event-driven architecture.
Line range hint
1-146: Overall assessment: Good improvements with one issue to address.The changes to
ResourceLinkServicesignificantly enhance its functionality by integrating event-driven logging for both resource link creation and updates. The implementation is consistent and follows good practices, including:
- Proper dependency injection of
EventBus.- Encapsulation of logging logic in the
logActivitymethod.- Detailed activity logging in both
createandupdatemethods.However, there is one issue in the
updatemethod that needs to be addressed:
- The use of
super.createinstead ofsuper.updatemay lead to unintended behavior.Once this issue is resolved, the changes will greatly improve the service's capabilities and maintainability.
packages/core/src/favorite/favorite.service.ts (3)
112-112: LGTM: Type casting updated correctly.The type casting change from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumis consistent with the import statement update. This change ensures type consistency throughout the file.
Line range hint
1-143: Overall assessment: Changes are minimal and focused.The modifications in this file are limited to updating the entity enum type from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. These changes are consistent and do not alter the overall structure or functionality of theFavoriteServiceclass. The rest of the file remains unchanged, maintaining its original logic and error handling.
3-3: Verify the impact ofBaseEntityEnumacross the codebase.The change from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumin the import statement is consistent with the refactoring mentioned in the PR summary. This change looks good, but it's important to ensure that all references toEntityEnumhave been updated throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Import statement update verified successfully.
All instances of
EntityEnumhave been replaced withBaseEntityEnum, andBaseEntityEnumis used consistently throughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EntityEnum and confirm all have been updated to BaseEntityEnum # Test 1: Search for remaining EntityEnum references echo "Searching for remaining EntityEnum references:" rg --type typescript "EntityEnum" # Test 2: Confirm BaseEntityEnum is now used consistently echo "Confirming BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg --type typescript "BaseEntityEnum" # Note: If Test 1 returns results, those files may need updating. # Test 2 should show consistent usage of BaseEntityEnum across the codebase.Length of output: 319
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EntityEnum and confirm all have been updated to BaseEntityEnum # Test 1: Search for remaining EntityEnum references in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for remaining EntityEnum references in TypeScript files:" rg "EntityEnum" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Test 2: Confirm BaseEntityEnum is now used consistently in .ts and .tsx files echo "Confirming BaseEntityEnum usage in TypeScript files:" rg "BaseEntityEnum" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Note: # - If Test 1 returns results, those files may need updating. # - Test 2 should show consistent usage of BaseEntityEnum across the codebase.Length of output: 16664
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all references to EntityEnum have been replaced with BaseEntityEnum # Test 1: Search for remaining standalone EntityEnum references in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for standalone EntityEnum references in TypeScript files:" rg "\\bEntityEnum\\b" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Test 2: Confirm BaseEntityEnum is now used consistently in .ts and .tsx files echo "Confirming BaseEntityEnum usage in TypeScript files:" rg "\\bBaseEntityEnum\\b" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Notes: # - Test 1 should return no results if all EntityEnum references have been correctly replaced. # - Test 2 should show consistent usage of BaseEntityEnum across the codebase.Length of output: 8258
packages/core/src/tasks/commands/handlers/task-create.handler.ts (1)
78-85: LGTM: Consistent usage of BaseEntityEnum.The changes in the
executemethod correctly useBaseEntityEnum.Taskinstead ofEntityEnum.Task. This maintains consistency with the updated import and preserves the intended functionality.packages/core/src/comment/comment.entity.ts (5)
6-6: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe import statement has been updated to include
BaseEntityEnuminstead ofCommentEntityEnum. This change is consistent with the refactoring effort mentioned in the PR summary.
22-22: LGTM: ApiProperty decorator updated correctlyThe ApiProperty decorator has been updated to use
BaseEntityEnum, which is consistent with the import statement change and ensures that the API documentation reflects the correct enum type.
27-27: LGTM: Entity property type updated correctlyThe
entityproperty type has been updated toBaseEntityEnum, which is consistent with the previous changes to the decorators and import statement.
Line range hint
1-180: Overall assessment: Changes look goodThe changes in this file are consistent and align with the refactoring effort to replace
CommentEntityEnumwithBaseEntityEnum. All necessary updates have been made to the import statement, decorators, and property type. The changes improve the consistency of the codebase and should not introduce any breaking changes.To ensure a smooth transition, please make sure to:
- Update any related documentation that might reference the old enum type.
- Run the verification script provided earlier to check for any remaining occurrences of
CommentEntityEnumin the codebase.- Update any unit tests that might be affected by this change.
24-24: LGTM: IsEnum decorator updated correctlyThe IsEnum decorator has been updated to use
BaseEntityEnum, which is consistent with the previous changes and ensures that the validation uses the correct enum type.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to verify that all occurrences of
CommentEntityEnumhave been replaced withBaseEntityEnum:packages/contracts/src/index.ts (1)
149-149: Approve renaming of EntityEnum to BaseEntityEnumThe renaming of
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumimproves clarity and is likely part of a larger refactoring effort. This change enhances code readability by making the enum's purpose more explicit.To ensure this change doesn't introduce breaking changes, please verify its usage across the codebase. Run the following script to check for any remaining references to
EntityEnum:This will help identify any places where the old
EntityEnummight still be in use and confirm thatBaseEntityEnumis properly imported where needed.✅ Verification successful
Renaming of EntityEnum to BaseEntityEnum Verified Successfully
All references to
EntityEnumhave been successfully replaced withBaseEntityEnum, and no instances of the oldEntityEnumremain in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EntityEnum # Test: Search for EntityEnum usage rg --type typescript 'EntityEnum' # Test: Verify BaseEntityEnum is properly imported where used rg --type typescript 'BaseEntityEnum'Length of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to EntityEnum # Test: Search for EntityEnum usage rg --type ts 'EntityEnum' # Test: Verify BaseEntityEnum is properly imported where used rg --type ts 'BaseEntityEnum'Length of output: 16368
packages/core/src/organization-project-module/organization-project-module.service.ts (4)
6-6: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to use
BaseEntityEnuminstead ofEntityEnum, which is consistent with the reported changes.
57-57: LGTM: Enum references updated correctly in thecreatemethod.The
EntityEnum.OrganizationProjectModulereferences have been correctly updated toBaseEntityEnum.OrganizationProjectModulein both thegenerateActivityLogDescriptionfunction call and theActivityLogEventconstructor. These changes maintain the intended functionality while reflecting the enum renaming.Also applies to: 64-64
116-116: LGTM: Enum references updated correctly in theupdatemethod.The
EntityEnum.OrganizationProjectModulereferences have been correctly updated toBaseEntityEnum.OrganizationProjectModulein both thegenerateActivityLogDescriptionfunction call and theActivityLogEventconstructor within theupdatemethod. These changes maintain the intended functionality while reflecting the enum renaming.Also applies to: 128-128
Line range hint
1-424: Overall assessment: Changes are consistent and correctly implemented.The renaming of
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumhas been consistently applied throughout the file. All references to the enum have been updated correctly in the import statement,createmethod, andupdatemethod. These changes maintain the existing functionality while reflecting the new enum name.No other modifications to the logic or structure of the
OrganizationProjectModuleServicewere made, which is appropriate given the scope of the change. The refactoring appears to be complete and correct for this file.packages/core/src/organization-project/organization-project.service.ts (5)
6-6: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to use
BaseEntityEnuminstead ofEntityEnum, which is consistent with the reported changes in the AI-generated summary.
39-39: LGTM: Decorator updated correctly.The
@FavoriteServicedecorator has been updated to useBaseEntityEnum.OrganizationProject, which is consistent with the renaming ofEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum.
130-130: LGTM: Method call updated correctly.The
generateActivityLogDescriptionmethod call has been updated to useBaseEntityEnum.OrganizationProject, which is consistent with the renaming ofEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum.
137-137: LGTM: Event constructor updated correctly.The
ActivityLogEventconstructor call has been updated to useBaseEntityEnum.OrganizationProjectfor theentityproperty, which is consistent with the renaming ofEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum.
Line range hint
1-638: Verify the impact of EntityEnum renaming across the application.The changes in this file consistently rename
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. While these changes look correct within the context of this file, it's important to ensure that this renaming has been applied consistently across the entire application to prevent any potential runtime errors or unexpected behavior.To verify the consistency of these changes, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining instances of
EntityEnum, verify the usage ofBaseEntityEnum, and check for potential naming conflicts. Please review the results to ensure consistency across the codebase.✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Update Search Commands to Use File Extensions
The previous script failed because the
typescriptfile type was unrecognized. To ensure the search is effective, please use the updated script below that targets.tsand.tsxfiles directly:This script targets TypeScript files by explicitly specifying the
.tsand.tsxextensions, ensuring that all relevant files are included in the search. Please execute this script and provide the output to continue the verification process.
Action Required: Correct Shell Script Syntax for Excluding Test Files
The previous script failed because the shell misinterpreted the
!character, leading to errors. To resolve this, the exclusion patterns need to be properly escaped. Please use the updated script below with corrected syntax:Notes:
- The
!in the-goption is used to exclude files matching the specified patterns. By enclosing the exclusion patterns in quotes and placing the!directly before the pattern without a space, we prevent the shell from interpreting!as a history expansion character.- Ensure that the script is executed in an environment where
rgis properly installed and configured.- After running this script, please provide the output to continue the verification process.
Action Required: Correct Shell Script to Properly Exclude Test Files
The previous script failed because the shell misinterpreted the
!character, leading to errors. To resolve this, the exclusion patterns need to be properly escaped or quoted. Please use the updated script below with corrected syntax:Notes:
- The
set +Hcommand disables history expansion, preventing the shell from misinterpreting the!character.- Ensure that the script is executed in an environment where
rgis properly installed and configured.- After running this script, please provide the output to continue the verification process.
Verification Successful: No Remaining
EntityEnumInstances FoundThe renaming of
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumhas been successfully applied across the codebase. The search did not reveal any standalone instances ofEntityEnum. The remaining enums such asReactionEntityEnumandIntegrationEntityare distinct and intentional, ensuring there are no unintended references or naming conflicts introduced by the renaming process.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of EntityEnum and verify BaseEntityEnum usage # Search for any remaining EntityEnum instances echo "Searching for remaining EntityEnum instances:" rg --type typescript "EntityEnum" -g "!*.spec.ts" # Verify BaseEntityEnum usage echo "Verifying BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg --type typescript "BaseEntityEnum" -g "!*.spec.ts" # Check for any potential naming conflicts echo "Checking for potential naming conflicts:" rg --type typescript "enum.*Entity" -g "!*.spec.ts"Length of output: 527
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of EntityEnum and verify BaseEntityEnum usage # Search for any remaining EntityEnum instances in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for remaining EntityEnum instances:" rg "EntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" ! -g "*.spec.ts" ! -g "*.spec.tsx" # Verify BaseEntityEnum usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Verifying BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg "BaseEntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" ! -g "*.spec.ts" ! -g "*.spec.tsx" # Check for any potential naming conflicts in enums within .ts and .tsx files echo "Checking for potential naming conflicts:" rg "enum.*Entity" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" ! -g "*.spec.ts" ! -g "*.spec.tsx"Length of output: 752
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of EntityEnum and verify BaseEntityEnum usage # Search for any remaining EntityEnum instances in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for remaining EntityEnum instances:" rg "EntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "!.spec.ts" -g "!.spec.tsx" # Verify BaseEntityEnum usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Verifying BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg "BaseEntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "!.spec.ts" -g "!.spec.tsx" # Check for any potential naming conflicts in enums within .ts and .tsx files echo "Checking for potential naming conflicts:" rg "enum.*Entity" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "!.spec.ts" -g "!.spec.tsx"Length of output: 18160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of EntityEnum and verify BaseEntityEnum usage # Disable history expansion to prevent '!' from being interpreted by the shell set +H # Search for any remaining EntityEnum instances in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for remaining EntityEnum instances:" rg "EntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "!*.spec.ts" -g "!*.spec.tsx" # Verify BaseEntityEnum usage in .ts and .tsx files echo "Verifying BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg "BaseEntityEnum" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "!*.spec.ts" -g "!*.spec.tsx" # Check for any potential naming conflicts in enums within .ts and .tsx files echo "Checking for potential naming conflicts:" rg "enum.*Entity" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "!*.spec.ts" -g "!*.spec.tsx"Length of output: 18175
packages/core/src/organization-team/organization-team.service.ts (2)
44-44: LGTM. VerifyBaseEntityEnum.OrganizationTeamvalue consistency.The
@FavoriteServicedecorator has been correctly updated to useBaseEntityEnum.OrganizationTeam. This change aligns with the updated import statement.To ensure that the
OrganizationTeamenum value remains consistent, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the values of EntityEnum.OrganizationTeam and BaseEntityEnum.OrganizationTeam echo "Searching for EntityEnum.OrganizationTeam definition:" rg "EntityEnum\s*=\s*{[^}]*OrganizationTeam[^}]*}" --type ts echo "\nSearching for BaseEntityEnum.OrganizationTeam definition:" rg "BaseEntityEnum\s*=\s*{[^}]*OrganizationTeam[^}]*}" --type tsThis will help confirm that the enum value for
OrganizationTeamhasn't changed during the refactoring process.
21-21: Verify consistency ofBaseEntityEnumusage across the codebase.The import statement has been updated from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. While this change appears correct for this file, it's crucial to ensure that this modification has been consistently applied throughout the entire codebase to prevent any potential runtime errors.To confirm the consistency of this change, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Correct the shell script to properly verify
BaseEntityEnumusage.The previous script encountered regex parse errors due to incorrect patterns. Please run the updated script below to check for any remaining usage of
EntityEnumand ensureBaseEntityEnumis consistently used across the codebase.
Fixing regex patterns to properly verify
BaseEntityEnumusage.The previous script encountered regex parse errors due to unescaped curly braces
{. Please run the updated script below to accurately check for any remaining usage ofEntityEnumand ensureBaseEntityEnumis consistently used across the codebase.
BaseEntityEnum usage is consistent across the codebase.
The import statement has been successfully updated from
EntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnumthroughout the codebase. No instances ofEntityEnumremain, ensuring consistency and preventing potential runtime errors.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum and compare with BaseEntityEnum usage echo "Checking for remaining EntityEnum usage:" rg "EntityEnum" --type ts echo "\nChecking BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg "BaseEntityEnum" --type ts echo "\nComparing import statements:" rg "import.*EntityEnum" --type ts rg "import.*BaseEntityEnum" --type tsLength of output: 675
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum and verify BaseEntityEnum usage echo "Checking for remaining EntityEnum usage:" rg 'EntityEnum\s*=\s*{' --type ts echo -e "\nChecking BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg 'BaseEntityEnum\s*=\s*{' --type ts echo -e "\nComparing import statements:" rg 'import\s+.*\bEntityEnum\b' --type ts rg 'import\s+.*\bBaseEntityEnum\b' --type tsLength of output: 2470
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of EntityEnum and verify BaseEntityEnum usage echo "Checking for remaining EntityEnum usage:" rg 'EntityEnum\s*=\s*\{' --type ts echo -e "\nChecking BaseEntityEnum usage:" rg 'BaseEntityEnum\s*=\s*\{' --type ts echo -e "\nComparing import statements:" rg 'import\s+.*\bEntityEnum\b' --type ts rg 'import\s+.*\bBaseEntityEnum\b' --type tsLength of output: 2264
packages/contracts/src/comment.model.ts (2)
27-27: Ensure consistency in 'entity' type within comment creation inputsThe
entityproperty in theICommentCreateInputinterface has been updated toBaseEntityEnum. Verify that all instances whereICommentCreateInputis used, especially in comment creation logic, are compatible with this change and that no references toCommentEntityEnumremain.Run the following script to locate any outdated references:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find uses of 'ICommentCreateInput' that may still reference 'CommentEntityEnum'. # Test: Search for 'ICommentCreateInput' usages. Expect: No occurrences of 'CommentEntityEnum'. rg --type typescript -A 5 'ICommentCreateInput' | rg 'CommentEntityEnum'
7-7: Verify the update of 'entity' type across the codebaseThe
entityproperty in theICommentinterface has been changed fromCommentEntityEnumtoBaseEntityEnum. Please ensure that all references toCommentEntityEnumthroughout the codebase have been updated toBaseEntityEnum. Additionally, confirm thatBaseEntityEnumincludes all the necessary entities that were previously part ofCommentEntityEnum.Run the following script to check for any remaining references to
CommentEntityEnum:packages/core/src/tasks/task.service.ts (3)
17-17: Updated import toBaseEntityEnumThe import statement now includes
BaseEntityEnum, replacing the previousEntityEnum. Ensure that all usages ofEntityEnumin the codebase have been updated toBaseEntityEnumto prevent any import or reference errors.
107-107: Updated enum usage ingenerateActivityLogDescriptionIn the call to
generateActivityLogDescription,BaseEntityEnum.Taskis now used instead ofEntityEnum.Task. Confirm thatBaseEntityEnum.Taskis the correct and intended value, and thatgenerateActivityLogDescriptionhandles it appropriately.
119-119: Updatedentityproperty inActivityLogEventThe
ActivityLogEventnow sets theentityproperty toBaseEntityEnum.Task. Verify thatActivityLogEventis designed to work withBaseEntityEnumand that this change is consistent across all event logging.
* feat: #8386 global logging API middleware * fix: #8386 save API response into DB * fix: store missing user id to the tabele * fix: favorite entity type use global entity enum * fix: #8386 api call log module middleware routes * fix: improvement suggested by CodeRabbit * fix: #8386 recursively process nested objects and arrays * fix: updated logger * feat(ActivityLog): Optimize beforeEntityCreate and beforeEntityUpdate methods - Centralized serialization logic for SQLite databases into a single method `serializeDataForSQLite`. - Refactored `beforeEntityCreate` and `beforeEntityUpdate` methods to delegate serialization logic to the new method. * fix(cspell): typo spelling :-) * fix: no need to store empty object into DB * fix(api-call-log): correct middleware configuration for time tracking routes - Replaced the unsupported regular expression pattern in route paths with the correct wildcard pattern ('/timesheet/*') in the `ApiCallLogMiddleware`. * feat: login components to handle workspace login and navigation * fix: rename `_errorHandlingService` to `errorHandlingService` and update type annotations in `NgxLoginComponent` constructor and `tap` callback. * resolves #8379 by fixing late desktop theme listener setup * fix: login components to handle workspace navigation and state * fix: #8386 updated call log middleware * fix: #8386 added http method transformer pipe * fix: ensure robust extraction of token from authorization header * fix: optimize code based on coderabbitai suggestion * fix: apply filters on logging API * refactor: time tracker component to combine conditions for retrieving remote log and handle API request * feat: add two function calls to updateTaskStatus and updateOrganizationTeamEmployee on silent restart * fix: improve ActorTypeTransformerPipe for integer storage * feat: add missing `version` property to timer objects in SequenceQueue and TimeTrackerComponent. * fix: optimize code based on coderabbitai suggestion * fix: optimize code based on coderabbitai suggestion * [Fix] View and Resource Links Activity Logs (#8409) * fix: organization sprint update activity log * feat: task view activity log * feat: resource link activity log * fix: removed unecessary js-docs * fix: use global base entity enum * fix: CodeRabbit suggestions * fix: CodeRabbit suggestions --------- Co-authored-by: Ruslan Konviser <evereq@gmail.com> * [Feat] Selector update persistence electron side (#8421) * feat: create electron selector service * feat: electronService with selectorElectronService in client-selector, note, project-selector, task-selector, and team-selector components * fix: rename 'refresh' method to 'clear' in client-selector, project-selector, task-selector, and team-selector components * feat: add conditional check for `this.useStore` in `clear()` method of ClientSelector, ProjectSelector, TaskSelector, and TeamSelector components. * [Fix] Seed process not working (#8422) * [Fix] Seed process not working * [Fix] Seed process not working * chore: windows builds --------- Co-authored-by: Rahul R. <rahulrathore576@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: GloireMutaliko21 <mufunyig@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Kifungo A <45813955+adkif@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Gloire Mutaliko (Salva) <86450367+GloireMutaliko21@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: samuel mbabhazi <111171386+samuelmbabhazi@users.noreply.github.com>
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ResourceLinkandTaskView.Bug Fixes
TaskViewUpdateHandlerto ensure it updates existing task views instead of creating new ones.Refactor
BaseEntityEnumfor improved consistency across the application.Documentation