Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

evm: ignore precompile addresses for some target access events #3366

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

g11tech
Copy link
Contributor

@g11tech g11tech commented Apr 24, 2024

address a pending change of ignoring precompiles for some target access events

if (
common.isActivatedEIP(6800) &&
runState.interpreter._evm.getPrecompile(toAddress) === undefined
) {
// TODO: add check if toAddress is not a precompile
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we remove this comment here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh yes lol

acolytec3
acolytec3 previously approved these changes Apr 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@acolytec3 acolytec3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Left one question on a seeming obsolete comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@acolytec3 acolytec3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! @holgerd77 could we admin merge this? The only test failure is browser tests which are failing for some unknown vitest related reason at the moment.

@acolytec3 acolytec3 merged commit b997dc8 into master Apr 24, 2024
33 of 34 checks passed
@holgerd77 holgerd77 deleted the ignore-precompile-accesses branch July 11, 2024 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants