-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 403
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add returndata to tx receipts #542
Open
charles-cooper
wants to merge
1
commit into
ethereum:main
Choose a base branch
from
charles-cooper:txreceipt-returndata
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the return data is usually not stored because it can retrieved by re-executing the tx again, hence it's only part of the trace responses.
if this is an option, then it's ambiguous what the client impl should do, always re-execute or always return null
but having a standard call for obtaining the returndata would be very useful, so maybe this should be a standalone function instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i left it optional exactly for this reason, clients probably do not have the returndata stored, so in the short-term they can keep doing exactly what they have been doing. it is preferred by consumers that the returndata is there, but if it is nil then they can fall back to workaround (as they currently do).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a standardized
eth_getReturnData
would also work for this purpose, although it seems inefficient since in the (very common) case that you want to inspect the returndata, you need to make two calls instead of just one.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just want to include some points offline - asking for returndata in getTxReceipt may increase latency and/or pricing for infra providers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
by the way, having two calls is pretty problematic because there are race conditions when you have to call the node twice (there could be a reorg or the node provider could switch clients and the second call returns null or a different value). the ideal state of affairs is to get the result back in one call.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
another issue in practice is that RPC providers fail all the time, so a very common case is that you get the result of
eth_getTransactionReceipt
but then the node fails, and the following call to grab the trace (or alternatives like the above proposedeth_getReturnData
) fails. it's not a showstopper, you can do a second retry loop or failover to another RPC. but it's more ideal -- just simpler and less prone to failure -- to get the returndata back in a single call.