Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIP4844: Handle barycentric evaluation at roots of unity #3214

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 17, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 5 additions & 3 deletions specs/eip4844/polynomial-commitments.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -302,11 +302,13 @@ def evaluate_polynomial_in_evaluation_form(polynomial: Polynomial,
assert width == FIELD_ELEMENTS_PER_BLOB
inverse_width = bls_modular_inverse(BLSFieldElement(width))

# Make sure we won't divide by zero during division
assert z not in ROOTS_OF_UNITY

roots_of_unity_brp = bit_reversal_permutation(ROOTS_OF_UNITY)

# If we are asked to evaluate within the domain, we already know the answer
if z in roots_of_unity_brp:
eval_index = roots_of_unity_brp.index(z)
return BLSFieldElement(polynomial[eval_index])

result = 0
for i in range(width):
a = BLSFieldElement(int(polynomial[i]) * int(roots_of_unity_brp[i]) % BLS_MODULUS)
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,9 +1,13 @@
import random

from eth2spec.test.context import (
spec_state_test,
with_eip4844_and_later,
)
from eth2spec.test.helpers.sharding import (
get_sample_blob,
get_poly_in_both_forms,
eval_poly_in_coeff_form,
)


Expand All @@ -18,3 +22,68 @@ def test_verify_kzg_proof(spec, state):

y = spec.evaluate_polynomial_in_evaluation_form(polynomial, x)
assert spec.verify_kzg_proof_impl(commitment, x, y, proof)


@with_eip4844_and_later
@spec_state_test
def test_barycentric_outside_domain(spec, state):
"""
Test barycentric formula correctness by using it to evaluate a polynomial at a bunch of points outside its domain
(the roots of unity).

Then make sure that we would get the same result if we evaluated it from coefficient form without using the
barycentric formula
"""
rng = random.Random(5566)
poly_coeff, poly_eval = get_poly_in_both_forms(spec)
roots_of_unity_brp = spec.bit_reversal_permutation(spec.ROOTS_OF_UNITY)

assert len(poly_coeff) == len(poly_eval) == len(roots_of_unity_brp)
n_samples = 12

for _ in range(n_samples):
# Get a random evaluation point and make sure it's not a root of unity
z = rng.randint(0, spec.BLS_MODULUS - 1)
while z in roots_of_unity_brp:
z = rng.randint(0, spec.BLS_MODULUS - 1)

hwwhww marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
# Get p(z) by evaluating poly in coefficient form
p_z_coeff = eval_poly_in_coeff_form(spec, poly_coeff, z)

# Get p(z) by evaluating poly in evaluation form
p_z_eval = spec.evaluate_polynomial_in_evaluation_form(poly_eval, z)

# Both evaluations should agree
assert p_z_coeff == p_z_eval


@with_eip4844_and_later
@spec_state_test
def test_barycentric_within_domain(spec, state):
"""
Test barycentric formula correctness by using it to evaluate a polynomial at all the points of its domain
(the roots of unity).

Then make sure that we would get the same result if we evaluated it from coefficient form without using the
barycentric formula
"""
poly_coeff, poly_eval = get_poly_in_both_forms(spec)
roots_of_unity_brp = spec.bit_reversal_permutation(spec.ROOTS_OF_UNITY)

assert len(poly_coeff) == len(poly_eval) == len(roots_of_unity_brp)
n = len(poly_coeff)

# Iterate over the entire domain
for i in range(n):
# Grab a root of unity and use it as the evaluation point
z = int(roots_of_unity_brp[i])

# Get p(z) by evaluating poly in coefficient form
p_z_coeff = eval_poly_in_coeff_form(spec, poly_coeff, z)

# Get p(z) by evaluating poly in evaluation form
p_z_eval = spec.evaluate_polynomial_in_evaluation_form(poly_eval, z)

# The two evaluations should be agree and p(z) should also be the i-th "coefficient" of the polynomial in
# evaluation form
assert p_z_coeff == p_z_eval == poly_eval[i]
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions tests/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/helpers/sharding.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -66,6 +66,38 @@ def get_sample_blob(spec, rng=None):
return spec.Blob(b)


def eval_poly_in_coeff_form(spec, coeffs, x):
"""
Evaluate a polynomial in coefficient form at 'x' using Horner's rule
"""
total = 0
for a in reversed(coeffs):
total = (total * x + a) % spec.BLS_MODULUS
return total % spec.BLS_MODULUS


def get_poly_in_both_forms(spec, rng=None):
"""
Generate and return a random polynomial in both coefficient form and evaluation form
"""
if rng is None:
rng = random.Random(5566)

roots_of_unity_brp = spec.bit_reversal_permutation(spec.ROOTS_OF_UNITY)

coeffs = [
rng.randint(0, spec.BLS_MODULUS - 1)
for _ in range(spec.FIELD_ELEMENTS_PER_BLOB)
]

evals = [
eval_poly_in_coeff_form(spec, coeffs, int(z))
for z in roots_of_unity_brp
]

return coeffs, evals


def get_sample_opaque_tx(spec, blob_count=1, rng=None):
blobs = []
blob_kzg_commitments = []
Expand Down