Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP implementation of Danksharding #2792

Merged
merged 69 commits into from
Jul 18, 2022
Merged

WIP implementation of Danksharding #2792

merged 69 commits into from
Jul 18, 2022

Conversation

dankrad
Copy link
Contributor

@dankrad dankrad commented Jan 7, 2022

@hwwhww hwwhww added DO NOT MERGE general:RFC Request for Comments scope:sharding Sharding and removed general:RFC Request for Comments labels Jan 7, 2022
Copy link
Member

@Nashatyrev Nashatyrev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some minor questions and cleanup suggestions

dankrad and others added 22 commits July 6, 2022 18:19
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: George Kadianakis <desnacked@riseup.net>
@dankrad dankrad marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2022 21:40
@dankrad
Copy link
Contributor Author

dankrad commented Jul 7, 2022

Now ready for merge @djrtwo

```python
def process_block(state: BeaconState, block: BeaconBlock) -> None:
def process_beacon_block(state: BeaconState, block: BeaconBlock) -> None:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renaming this is going to have large ripple effects in testing, tooling, and any rile with the function as dependency. Suggest keeping the same name and just adding the process_intermediate_block

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

process_intermediate_block

Did we settle on "builder block" (and "proposer block")?

@hwwhww
Copy link
Contributor

hwwhww commented Jul 15, 2022

Does it make sense to rebase/squash the commits a bit? Or even do "Squash and merge"?

@djrtwo
Copy link
Contributor

djrtwo commented Jul 18, 2022

I'm fine with squash and merge

@djrtwo djrtwo merged commit 02a2b71 into dev Jul 18, 2022
@djrtwo djrtwo deleted the danksharding branch July 18, 2022 17:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.