-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP implementation of Danksharding #2792
Conversation
minor Merge and forkchoice updates release
release v1.1.7
release v1.1.8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor questions and cleanup suggestions
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hsiaowei.eth@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: George Kadianakis <desnacked@riseup.net>
Now ready for merge @djrtwo |
specs/sharding/beacon-chain.md
Outdated
```python | ||
def process_block(state: BeaconState, block: BeaconBlock) -> None: | ||
def process_beacon_block(state: BeaconState, block: BeaconBlock) -> None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Renaming this is going to have large ripple effects in testing, tooling, and any rile with the function as dependency. Suggest keeping the same name and just adding the process_intermediate_block
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
process_intermediate_block
Did we settle on "builder block" (and "proposer block")?
Does it make sense to rebase/squash the commits a bit? Or even do "Squash and merge"? |
I'm fine with squash and merge |
https://notes.ethereum.org/3t5cbN7cQnG6VxjgNMKymA