-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
filter viable branches in fork choice #1495
Conversation
Release v0.9.2 to master
Co-Authored-By: Diederik Loerakker <proto@protolambda.com>
5c44117
to
dfcd6f6
Compare
Do we merge rm-signing-root first? If so, we should change the signing-roots here to hash-tree-root. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small style adjustment, avoid a full state copy.
Also verified that with the unfiltered tree the test fails. But looking forward to more integration-like fork choice tests, unit-testing looks like a poor fit for fork-choice.
Let's update with signing root changes, then merge 👍
@djrtwo I think you should change the target branch to |
yep nice catch @hwwhww ! |
Co-Authored-By: Hsiao-Wei Wang <hwwang156@gmail.com>
e87dade
to
e53a6da
Compare
Filter for branches that see latest finalized/justified info as correct on-chain before running
get_head
.more info here https://notes.ethereum.org/Fj-gVkOSTpOyUx-zkWjuwg?view