Add ERC: Social Media NFTs #782
Conversation
eip-review-bot
changed the title
ERCS/erc-7824.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| eip: 7824 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| eip: 7824 | |
| eip: 7847 |
Assigning next sequential EIP/ERC/RIP number.
Numbers are assigned by editors & associates.
Please also update the filename.
ERCS/erc-7824.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| eip: 7824 | |||
| title: Nostr and NFT Compatible Social Media Standard | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| title: Nostr and NFT Compatible Social Media Standard | |
| title: Social Media NFTs |
Standard is superfluous in an ERC title.
Is this ERC specific to Nostr protocol? If not, then suggest using a wider title.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You're right. I originally had a short title, but I thought I would start with something long and see what people thought. It's definitely not only for Nostr. It uses Nostr as a base since they did a great job figuring out how to represent social media data in the most light handed way. Otherwise it's fairly agnostic beyond a few basic required fields, which could diverge from Nostr or be mapped to Blue Sky's AT protocol. Both Nostr and AT protocol are event driven and have the same basic fields, but Nostr is more relaxed so it makes a better generic protocol. ActivityPub (Mastodon) is completely different, but it does not lend itself well to blockchain mainly because identities are domain based.
ERCS/erc-7824.md
Outdated
| status: Draft | ||
| type: Standards Track | ||
| category: ERC | ||
| discussions: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7832-nostr-and-nft-compatible-social-media-publishing-standard/22280 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| discussions: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7832-nostr-and-nft-compatible-social-media-publishing-standard/22280 | |
| discussions: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/erc-7847-nostr-and-nft-compatible-social-media-publishing/22280 |
Updated Eth Magicians title with assigned number.
Discussions topic could just include a link to this PR and the abstract. You shouldn't copy/paste the entire ERC as it will diverge through the editing process.
ERCS/erc-7824.md
Outdated
| requires: "721, 1155" | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Simple Summary |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please remove this section
eip-review-bot
changed the title
… media linking consistent, markdown and json formatting
|
The commit fd05f7d (as a parent of 284da52) contains errors. |
eip: 7824 (temp)
title: Nostr and NFT Compatible Social Media Standard
author: Nick Juntilla nick@ownerfy.com
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7832-nostr-and-nft-compatible-social-media-publishing-standard/22280
status: Draft
type: Standards Track
category: ERC
discussions: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7832-nostr-and-nft-compatible-social-media-publishing-standard/22280
created: 2024-12-18
requires: "721, 1155"
Simple Summary
This proposal defines a standardized format for representing decentralized social media posts as NFTs. The Nostr protocol has already done most of the heavy lifting for creating an open decentralized social media network. This EIP servces the purpose of adapting those standards to the most common blockchain non-fungible standards to take advantage of the reach and longevity of the blockchain. It is genericized here so that it can be easily adapted to the AT protocol, used in other event based decentralized social media, blogs, encrypted messaging, an RSS feed or miscellaneous publication. This model is flexible where the meaning and type of post (original, reply, repost, images, video, text, etc...) is derived from its metadata. Additionally there is a mechanism to edit a post to a new version.