Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move EIP assets to assets folder #977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2018
Merged

Move EIP assets to assets folder #977

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2018

Conversation

0xjac
Copy link
Contributor

@0xjac 0xjac commented Apr 6, 2018

After a brief discussion with @Arachnid I suggest the following changes to the EIPs repository to make sure that EIPS with images and other assets pass the CI checks.

  • Create assets folder
  • Move existing EIPs (1, 107, 858) assets into the assets folder
  • Update link to assets in EIPs 1, 107 and 858
  • Describe the inclusion of assets for EIPs in README.md

Note this is a change to the EIPs repository, not an EIP itself.

@eip-automerger
Copy link

Hi! I'm a bot, and I wanted to automerge your PR, but couldn't because of the following issue(s):

  • EIP 1 is in state Active, not Draft
  • File README.md is not an EIP
  • File assets/eip-1/process.png is not an EIP
  • File assets/eip-107/authorization-locked.png is not an EIP
  • File assets/eip-107/authorization-password.png is not an EIP
  • File assets/eip-107/authorization.png is not an EIP
  • File assets/eip-858/calculations.md is not an EIP
  • EIP 107 requires approval from one of (wighawag@gmail.com)
  • EIP 858 requires approval from one of (cslarson@gmail.com)

@0xjac
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xjac commented Apr 6, 2018

Note: the changes to EIP1, EIP107 and EIP858 are solely to update the links to their respective images. None of the actual content or wording has been modified!

EIPS/eip-1.md Outdated
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ EIPs can also be superseded by a different EIP, rendering the original obsolete.

The possible paths of the status of EIPs are as follows:

![EIP Process](eip-1/process.png)
![EIP Process](/assets/eip-1/process.png)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't use absolute paths - this will break for anyone running it on theirname.github.io.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok I'll fix it to ../assets/eip-1/process.png (and the other links too)

EIPS/eip-1.md Outdated
@@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ Each EIP should have the following parts:
EIP Formats and Templates
-------------------------

EIPs should be written in [markdown] format. Image files should be included in a subdirectory for that EIP.
EIPs should be written in [markdown] format.
Image files should be included in a subdirectory of the `assets` folder for that EIP as follow: `assets/eip-X` (for eip *X*).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two * for bold.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought it looked nicer italics, but I'm happy to make it bold.

- Create `assets` folder
- Move existing EIPs (1, 107, 858) assets into the `assets` folder
- Update link to assets in EIPs 1, 107 and 858
- Describe the inclusion of assets for EIPs in `README.md`
@Arachnid Arachnid merged commit 5b8055c into ethereum:master Apr 6, 2018
@0xjac 0xjac deleted the fix-folders branch April 6, 2018 12:39
Arachnid pushed a commit to Arachnid/EIPs that referenced this pull request May 2, 2018
- Create `assets` folder
- Move existing EIPs (1, 107, 858) assets into the `assets` folder
- Update link to assets in EIPs 1, 107 and 858
- Describe the inclusion of assets for EIPs in `README.md`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants