Update EIP-1: Fix Backward Compatibility Typos

[Pandapip1]

This has been bugging me for a while. Thoughts?

[eth-bot]

Hi! I'm a bot, and I wanted to automerge your PR, but couldn't because of the following issue(s):

---

(fail) eip-1.md

classification
updateEIP

• Changes to EIP 1 require at least 5 unique approvals from editors; there's currently 1 approvals; the remaining editors are @lightclient, @axic, @SamWilsn, @gcolvin

(fail) eip-template.md

classification
ambiguous

• 'eip-template.md' must be in eip-###.md format; this error will be overwritten upon relevant editor approval

[SamWilsn]

I think they're both acceptable, and prefer the option that doesn't require changing eipw 🤣

[Pandapip1]

I think they're both acceptable, and prefer the option that doesn't require changing eipw 🤣

Should we add a [sic] then?

[lightclient]

Although this is the more accepted form, both are technically correct. I think that it's best to leave as-is so that we don't need to change 5000+ EIPs and eipw.

[Pandapip1]

both are technically correct

Every spell checker I've used disagrees.

I can change the 5000+ files if need be. I think we can also just keep the old files as having the old form until they are changed. I volunteer to try to fix eipw.

[xinbenlv]

I am ok ether way. I just hope it be consistent across the board....

[Pandapip1]

Although this is the more accepted form, both are technically correct. I think that it's best to leave as-is so that we don't need to change 5000+ EIPs and eipw.

There are <1000 EIPs, and it's possible to automate this in a few minutes (see my change with the LICENSE file)

[lightclient]

@SamWilsn and I have both expressed that we do not want to pursue this change.