Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eip_validator to 0.8.2 #2161

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 2, 2019
Merged

Update eip_validator to 0.8.2 #2161

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3c64270
Update eip_validator to 0.8.2
axic Jul 1, 2019
ea5a00b
Fix Markdown formatting in EIP-1186
axic Jun 20, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion EIPS/eip-1186.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ Since this only adds a new Method there are no issues with Backwards Compatibili
## Test Cases
<!--Test cases for an implementation are mandatory for EIPs that are affecting consensus changes. Other EIPs can choose to include links to test cases if applicable.-->

<TODO>Tests still need to be implemented, but the core function creating the proof already exists inside the clients and are well tested.
TODO: Tests still need to be implemented, but the core function creating the proof already exists inside the clients and are well tested.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just broken HTML formatting.


## Implementation
<!--The implementations must be completed before any EIP is given status "Final", but it need not be completed before the EIP is accepted. While there is merit to the approach of reaching consensus on the specification and rationale before writing code, the principle of "rough consensus and running code" is still useful when it comes to resolving many discussions of API details.-->
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Gemfile
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,4 +31,4 @@ gem "wdm", "~> 0.1.0" if Gem.win_platform?

gem "html-proofer", '>=3.3.1'

gem "eip_validator", ">=0.8.0"
gem "eip_validator", ">=0.8.2"
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions Gemfile.lock
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ GEM
commonmarker (0.17.9)
ruby-enum (~> 0.5)
concurrent-ruby (1.0.5)
eip_validator (0.8.0)
eip_validator (0.8.2)
activemodel
front_matter_parser (~> 0.1.1)
ethon (0.11.0)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ PLATFORMS
ruby

DEPENDENCIES
eip_validator (>= 0.8.0)
eip_validator (>= 0.8.2)
github-pages
html-proofer (>= 3.3.1)
jekyll (~> 3.6.2)
Expand Down