Customizable editors

[Pandapip1]

Proposed Change

In eip-review-bot, currently there are predefined editor groups depending on the type and category. I propose that, as a stop-gap solution before implementing tags, that we have a slightly more customizable editor list for peer reviewers.

[SamWilsn]

What would this look like?

[xinbenlv]

Can you elaborate what is being proposed here @Pandapip1

[Pandapip1]

Basically, the config would be updated to look like this:

version: 2
editors:
    Pandapip1:
        - governance # Special category for governance
        - core
        - erc
        ...
    foobar: # Doesn't like NFTs
        - erc
        - !nft
    ...
categories:
    core:
        - category === "Core"
    erc:
        - category === "ERC"
    ...
    nft: # Example of some new features enabled by this
        - requires.split(",").some(eip => ["721", "1155"].includes(eip.trim()))
    

[xinbenlv]

Is this for peer reviewing (technical feedback) or for editing?

[Pandapip1]

Both! If you want, I can also extend it so that there are more special categories (governance, editor, reviewer)

[SamWilsn]

So !nft above removes NFT related topics from foobar's purview? Without tags, how does that work?

[Pandapip1]

The config file specifies the pseudo-tags

[Pandapip1]

Bump. Surprised the stale bot hasn't given any warnings.

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.

[Pandapip1]

Weird... why did I get notified about #6650 (comment) now?

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.

[github-actions]

This issue was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback.