Add ESP32-C6-DevkitC-1 symbol and footprint #103
Conversation
pedrominatel
added
new symbol
|
@pedrominatel In kicad 7 we can add alternative pin definitions. Should I attempt to add some of those as well? In this one I added /foo to some pins, but as a subjective judgement. Bootstrapping pins, UART0, and ADC. Is there any guideline for preference established for this repo? I don't see one in particular. |
|
Hi @nickoe, I think we can try to use this feature on this symbol and see if we change the others. Thanks |
|
Hi @nickoe, can you fix the conflict? Now we are moving to PCM approach and this new symbol and footprint will be included in the next release. |
|
@pedrominatel Yeah, I will fix it. I will also add an update with the alternate pin definitions. I am considering to remove all the pin silkscreen labels. They are a lot in the way if one decides to mount stuff under the module. I also fixed a typo for GPIO22 on pin 27. |
Based on the ESP32-S2-DevKitC-1
This is derived from the ESP32-S2-DevKitC-1 footprint to keep style and addapted as best effort in relation to the dimensional drawings and a simplified version of the dxf provided with the espressif documentation. I am not so sure about the tilde suffixes used in the S2 footprint design, I think they are meant to mean PWM capable outputs. Possibly and Arduinoism. I added them on essentially all pins and this what the espressif documentation stats as PWM capable pins,... but yet they have it on the 5V pin.
- Use GPIOx/ notation on all alternate pins - Keep strapping pin functions as defaults, plus for USB and UART0 - Fixed a typo for GPIO22 on pin 27
|
Mm, I did not intentionally close this pull request. |
|
Thanks @nickoe, I'll take a look and merge as soon as possible. |
|
Is there a 3D model ? |
|
I don't have one. I don't intend to fabricate one. Feel free to attempt that. I wonder if the other 3D models are contributor generared or of they are exports from espressiff. |
Fixes #99
The symbol and footprint are derived from the ESP32-S2-DevkitC-1, as I thought it was most similar. Please review.