Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Adding Port Term Based Connections examples #167

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 24, 2025

Conversation

srushti-patl
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Added Port 2 Port Term Based Connection
  • Added Port 2 Network Based Connection

@@ -151,6 +155,7 @@ resource "equinix_fabric_connection" "secondary_port_connection" {
}
order {
purchase_order_number = var.purchase_order_number != "" ? var.purchase_order_number : null
term_length = var.term_length != "" ? var.term_length: null
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because this is a number, is this the correct way to leave it out if it's the default value? Also, should the default value be 1? What are the implications of that?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Default value is 1 for term_length so I will update this condition.

@srushti-patl srushti-patl force-pushed the CXF-108363-Term-Based-Connection-Example branch from 460c92d to d19efde Compare February 21, 2025 01:17
Copy link
Collaborator

@thogarty thogarty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PLEASE READ Comments before merging

@thogarty thogarty merged commit 2eec22c into main Feb 24, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
@thogarty thogarty deleted the CXF-108363-Term-Based-Connection-Example branch February 24, 2025 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants