Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

made union of s_primes and concurencyLevels an empty set #14

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

yuuki-kagaku
Copy link
Contributor

removed 197 from s_primes, because 197 already presents in concurrencyLevels and this two sets should not intersect. If this two sets intersects it is possible for SingleWriterDictionary to degrade in performance.

removed 197 from s_primes, because 197 already presents in concurrencyLevels and this two sets should not intersect. If this two sets intersects it is possible for SingleWriterDictionary to degrade in performance.
made union of s_primes and concurencyLevels an empty set
@epeshk
Copy link
Owner

epeshk commented May 22, 2024

Thanks!

@epeshk epeshk merged commit ca7029d into epeshk:master May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants